Pengiriman Artikel ke

Jurnal Internasional

Bambang Sumintono (deceng@gmail.com & bambang@um.edu.my )

dosen di Institute of Educational Leadership – Universiti Malaya
Blog: http://deceng2.wordpress.com
ISI List of Journal
ISI List of Education: Q2
Temukan website jurnal
Registrasi account utk submit
Registrasi ke database jurnal
Mengirim artikel ke jurnal
Editorial ke jurnal: prosedural
Mengisi meta-data artikel: jenis artikel (riset empiris,
review, resensi buku), kata kunci, abstrak, daftar
pengarang, pencalonan penguji artikel (suggested
reviewers) dll.
Memuat naik artikel ke sistem basis data: file yang
terpisah: 1) File dengan identitas pengarang; 2)
Ringkasan artikel (highlights); 3) Surat pengantar;
4) Manuskrip tanpa identitas; 5) tabel-gambar-
diagram
Bukti pengiriman artikel dalam bentuk PDF
dikirimkan ke corresponding author
Editorial ke jurnal: proses
Proses Review artikel-1 : dilakukan oleh editor journal
[lama proses 1 minggu – 1 bulan; hasilnya diberi
tahukan via email: ditolak atau dilanjutkan dengan
pemeriksaan oleh reviewer]
Peer-review: double blind reviews, pemeriksa artikel
(2-3 orang pakar) dan penulis tidak tahu identitas
masing-masing. [lama proses paling cepat 2-3 bulan;
hasil via email apakah ditolak (rejected, kirim ke
journal lain), revisi besar (kirim kembali dalam waktu
3-6 bulan), revisi kecil (kirim dalam 1 bulan)
Pengalaman sebagai reviewer
 Kriteria penilaian
1. Relevansi terhadap jurnal
2. Siginificance for theory, practice, and clarity, impact and theoretical embeddedness
3. Acknowledgement of complexity in educational research and practice
4. Acknowledgement of context of research (world-wide understandable) and of author
5. Acknowledgement of the normative nature of educational practice
6. Acknowledgement of the human and relationship dimension of policy and practice
7. Clear arguments for choices of relevant methods; Systematic and transparency in use
of methods; Validities (ext., int., constructed) & reliability; Authenticity
8. Clear arguments for choices of relevant theories
9. Systematic and transparency in use of theories
10. Clear logic and structure in arguments/analysis from aim/purpose/problem to results
- does the study justify the conclusion, can the reder follow the line of
argument/analysis?
11. Presuppositions, hypothesis/research questions explicit and consistent
12. Reflexivity, of personal values and research methods
13. Style: Organization (clear structure of e.g. headings); Clarity; Elegance
14. Originality: Creativity, Imagination, Innovativeness; Ambitiousness; Ethical aspects,
Ownership, Respect; Communicability
Komentar dan penilaian
Overall while I appreciate the work of the authors in this manuscript, the
presentation of the results and implications of the work are not compelling….
The authors generalize their finding to perceptions of SBA nationally, but have
little evidence to support these assertions. Additionally, while the Q-Method is
fine to understand some of the rank-ordered perceptions of the issues on SBA in
this school, the authors over generalize on a sample of 72, performing many
different statistical analyses that go beyond the recommendations of Q-
method, which they do not have the statistical power to support. (reviewer-1)

 Theoretical Framework: this part is too direct and not giving much evidence
from research have been done in Malaysia or other countries about mathematics
teaching, teachers' perception or about school based assessment. Rather the
author(s), approach this to more general ideas about educational change; which
also not trying to make it relevant with support from literature review that
have connection with it. (reviewer-2)