Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Types of Relationships in Workgroups Team RAWEK
Types of Relationships in Workgroups Team RAWEK
TY P
W O R K G R O U P S
MEMBERS
VANESSA ROTCEH
KARLA YUBISELA
EDWIN LOPEZ
JESUS EDUARDO
TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS IN WORKGROUPS
THE ROLES CAN BEIDENTIFIED BY YOU, OR ESTABLISHED BY THE GROUPS THEMSELVES, E.G., BY GIVING
GROUPS A LIST OF POTENTIAL ROLES AND ASKING THEM TO DECIDE ON AND
DELEGATE APPROPRIATE ROLES WITHIN THEIR GROUP.
TEAM MEMBERS CAN PLAY MORE THAN ONE ROLE, DEPENDING ON THE NEEDS OF
THE PROJECT. ROLES CAN BE FIXED OR ROTATING.
TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS IN WORKGROUPS
ONE IDEA IS TO USE (AND ADAPT AS NEEDED) THE ROLES THAT MIGHTBE INCLUDED FOR A LARGE,
COLLABORATIVE PROJECT WITHIN YOUR DISCIPLINE.
OF COURSE, IT’S NOT NECESSARY TO USE ALL OF THESE ROLES AND A STUDENT MAYPLAY MORE THAN ONE
ROLE IN A TEAM. THE ROLES YOU ASSIGN FOR SHORTER, IN CLASS ACTIVITIES MAY BE DIFFERENTTHAN
THOSE USED FOR MORE PERMANENT TEAMS. AS A RULE OF THUMB, THENSHORTER THE TASK, THE SMALLER
THE GROUPS SHOULD BE, TO MINIMIZE THE TIMESPENT ON GETTING ORGANIZED AND STARTED.
ROLES Devil’s advocate: Responsible for pointing out alternate
viewpoints andasking tough questions.
• REALITY CHECKER: RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING GROUP DECISIONS AND Explorer/Innovator: Seeks to uncover new potential in
WHETHER THEYARE REALISTIC.
situations andpeople (fellow team members but also
clients) and explore new areas of
inquiry, alternative perspectives and ideas.
ROLES
• WILDCARD: ASSUMES THE ROLE OF ANY MISSING MEMBER AND FILLS IN WHEREVER
• NEEDED.
• MATERIALS/EQUIPMENT MANAGER: RESPONSIBLE FOR DISTRIBUTING AND TRACKING
• ALL MATERIALS, NOTES, AND EQUIPMENT.
• TECHNOLOGIST: LEARNS ANY NEW TECHNOLOGIES REQUIRED, ASSISTS OTHER
• MEMBERS USING THE TECHNOLOGY, ENSURES FINAL PRODUCT IS IN CORRECT FORMAT
• AND AVAILABLE FOR SHARING.
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
• PURPOSE
• THE PURPOSE OF THIS PAPER IS THREEFOLD: FIRST, TO EXAMINE THE JOB EMBEDDEDNESS (JE)-TURNOVER INTENTIONS
RELATIONSHIP IN LARGE AND SMALL ORGANISATIONS; SECOND, TO INVESTIGATE HOW EMPLOYEE PERCEPTIONS OF EACH
DIMENSION OF JE MAY DIFFER IN LARGE AND SMALL ORGANISATIONS; AND THIRD, TO DETERMINE IF WORK GROUP
COHESION MODERATES THE JE-TURNOVER INTENTIONS RELATIONSHIP.
• DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH
• USING A SHORT FORM OF THE ORIGINAL JE QUESTIONNAIRE, DATA WERE COLLECTED FROM 549 EMPLOYEES IN
ORGANISATIONS LOCATED IN FOUR MAJOR BUSINESS CENTRES IN SOUTH AFRICA. PARTICIPANTS WERE FROM
ORGANISATIONS IN DIVERSE INDUSTRIES.
WORKGROUP ETHICS & AWARENESS