Texas Instruments' Materials & Controls Group was formed through mergers and acquisitions over several decades. In the 1980s, facing competition from Japan, TI implemented a Total Quality Thrust program and began tracking Cost of Quality (COQ) metrics. COQ included costs from prevention, appraisal, internal failures, and external failures. Quality Improvement Teams used COQ data to prioritize and implement improvement projects. Additionally, high-level reviews monitored progress towards quality goals. As a result, COQ as a percentage of sales declined from 10.7% to 7.8% between 1982-1987, showing the COQ system was an effective driver of quality improvements.
Texas Instruments' Materials & Controls Group was formed through mergers and acquisitions over several decades. In the 1980s, facing competition from Japan, TI implemented a Total Quality Thrust program and began tracking Cost of Quality (COQ) metrics. COQ included costs from prevention, appraisal, internal failures, and external failures. Quality Improvement Teams used COQ data to prioritize and implement improvement projects. Additionally, high-level reviews monitored progress towards quality goals. As a result, COQ as a percentage of sales declined from 10.7% to 7.8% between 1982-1987, showing the COQ system was an effective driver of quality improvements.
Texas Instruments' Materials & Controls Group was formed through mergers and acquisitions over several decades. In the 1980s, facing competition from Japan, TI implemented a Total Quality Thrust program and began tracking Cost of Quality (COQ) metrics. COQ included costs from prevention, appraisal, internal failures, and external failures. Quality Improvement Teams used COQ data to prioritize and implement improvement projects. Additionally, high-level reviews monitored progress towards quality goals. As a result, COQ as a percentage of sales declined from 10.7% to 7.8% between 1982-1987, showing the COQ system was an effective driver of quality improvements.
quality • Texas Instrument’s Materials & Controls (M&C) Group was founded in 1916 as General Plate • Company, a manufacturer of clad and solid gold alloys for the jewelry industry . • Following steady growth in the1920's ,general Plate merged in 1931 with Spenser Thermostat Company, a research and the experimental company, to form Metals and Controls Incorporated. • In 1959, serious management problems forced a merger with Texas Instruments (TI). TI added M&C’s materials and device level strengths to its existing component. system level capabilities, brought management leadership that would shape the future growth of the group. Then in 1987, the Materials & Controls Group ,was the third largest of seven major businesses within Texas Instruments. • M&C was currently the world’s leading designer • and manufacturer of industrial and thermostatic clad metals. Clad metals consisted of two or more wrought metal layers that were metallurgically bonded together to offer properties not available in conventional metals. • MC group activities centered by two primary technologies. • 1.....METALLURGICAL MATERIALS • 2...CONTROL PRODUCTS Ayesha Arshad BAFM-18-18 Organization • Product Customer Center (PCC), a building block of Il comprising its own marketing, engineering, finance and manufacturing functions • Fabrication Customer Centers (FCC) manufactured components and sub-assemblles common to all PCC. • Four staff support activities existed at the group level. 1. Research and Development 2. Finance 3. People and Asset Effectiveness (responsible for quality assurance, training, purchasing and materials management), 4. Personnel/Group Services (responsible for facilities, tool making, automation and human resources) Quality at TI
• TI values: Productivity, Teamwork and problem-
solving. • TI's important client, HP. publicized a study comparing the best American suppliers to be inferior to Japan's worst suppliers. • As a result, Tl implemented "Total Quality Thrust" in 1980. Principles of Total Quality Thrust (TQT) • Management and all organizations is responsible for Quality and Reliability issues. • Manager Performance on Quality and Reliability Outcomes of Quality and Reliability are important and manager's commitment is not. • The goal and slogan competitors in the world Constantly surpass TI's best. Eisha Iqbal Roll No: 07 Cost of Quality • Cost of quality (COQ) was one of the performance measures that had to be included in every business unit’s Quality Blue Book. COQ represented expenditures that arose because poor quality had occurred or to prevent poor quality from occurring in the future. The COQ measures was designed to highlight the cost of poor quality, the cost of doing things wrong. • Implementation of COQ system began in the fourth quarter of 1981 when the quality department undertook a quick top-down exercise to determine quality costs. • The initial list of COQ variables included 77 items, a number that had since been reduced to 19 through the elimination of semantic overlaps between divisions and the merger of insignificant categories into other cost elements. • The variables were grouped into four broad categories : 1. Prevention Costs 2. Appraisal Costs 3. Internal failure Costs 4. External failure Costs Uses of COQ Data • Reducing the cost of poor quality is one of the best ways to increase a company’s profit. • Provides manageable entity and a single overview of quality. • Aligns quality & goals. • Prioritizes problems and provides a means to measure change/improvement. • Provides a mean to correctly distribute controllable quality cost for maximum profits. • Promotes the effective use of resources. • provides incentives for doing the job right every time. KHIZRA ABBAS COQ projects • Quality Improvement Teams, consisting of department managers, their staff, and representatives of support organizations met to establish Cost of Quality improvement projects, using COQ system numbers as priority setting mechanisms COQ projects • YIELD IMPROVEMENT • UPGRADE ASSY MACHINE • REDESIGN MOLDED PART • NON-DESTRUCT TESTING • LASER CODING • FLASH REDUCTION Two organizational mechanisms that support cost of quality improvement process
• The Quality Improvement Teams (QIT)
• The People & Asset Effectiveness (P&AE) reviews Quality improvement team • The QITs, which are in place at the group, division, and department levels of the business. • Quality Improvement Team (QIT) is a team taking lead to implement quality improvement activities. • Group of multi skilled employee charged with responsibilities of improving processes or services. • The team include top and middle management members to coordinate initial planning and implementation. People & Asset Effectiveness (P&AE) reviews. • The quality (P&AE) reviews,which are held quarterly. • Which is high-level management reviews. • In which business managers review progress against their short- and long term quality goals. System results; • Between the following inception of the COQ system in 1982 and the end of 1987, Cost of Quality as a percent of net sales billed had fallen from 10.7% to 7.8%. • The COQ system has proven to be a good attention getter, has forced priority setting and has stimulated quality improvement activities.