This document discusses defining a research problem and formulating hypotheses. It defines what constitutes a research problem and lists potential sources of problems such as theoretical interests, practical experiences, technology/social changes, and discussions with supervisors or colleagues. Techniques for defining a problem include understanding its origins, reviewing literature, discussions, rephrasing the problem analytically, and evaluating feasibility. A hypothesis is defined as a testable proposition about the relationship between variables. Sources of hypotheses include experiences, past research, data analysis, and social/technological changes. Hypotheses can be descriptive, relational, or causal and stated in positive, negative, null, or question form.
This document discusses defining a research problem and formulating hypotheses. It defines what constitutes a research problem and lists potential sources of problems such as theoretical interests, practical experiences, technology/social changes, and discussions with supervisors or colleagues. Techniques for defining a problem include understanding its origins, reviewing literature, discussions, rephrasing the problem analytically, and evaluating feasibility. A hypothesis is defined as a testable proposition about the relationship between variables. Sources of hypotheses include experiences, past research, data analysis, and social/technological changes. Hypotheses can be descriptive, relational, or causal and stated in positive, negative, null, or question form.
This document discusses defining a research problem and formulating hypotheses. It defines what constitutes a research problem and lists potential sources of problems such as theoretical interests, practical experiences, technology/social changes, and discussions with supervisors or colleagues. Techniques for defining a problem include understanding its origins, reviewing literature, discussions, rephrasing the problem analytically, and evaluating feasibility. A hypothesis is defined as a testable proposition about the relationship between variables. Sources of hypotheses include experiences, past research, data analysis, and social/technological changes. Hypotheses can be descriptive, relational, or causal and stated in positive, negative, null, or question form.
and Hypothesis Introduction • In research processes, the first step happens to be identifying and properly defining a research problem. • The researcher must find any social, economic, business problem and formulate it into research problem What is a Research Problem? • A research problem, in general, refers to some difficulty, which a researcher faces (experiences) in the context of both theoretical and practical situation and wants to obtain a solution. We say a research problem exist, if the following conditions are met: • There must be an individual or group or organization which has some difficulty/the problem • There must be some objectives to be attained • There must be an alternative means or actions for obtaining the objective (s) one wishes to attain. • There must remain some doubt in the mind of a researcher with regard to the selection of alternatives. • There must be some environment (s) to which the difficulty pertain Defining Research Problem
• “The problem clearly stated is a problem half
solved.” • In other words, defining a problem involves the task of laying down boundaries within which a researcher shall study the problem with a pre- determined objective(s) in view. • This statement emphasis that a research problem needs to be specified explicitly and needs to be narrowed down to the workable size. Sources of Research Problem The research problems may be selected from the following sources:- • A researcher may select a problem for investigation from a given theory in which he/she has considerable interest • Research problem can also be selected on the basis of daily experience and problems of a researcher. • From fast changing Technological and social situation. • Sometimes the researcher, while discussing his interests with the proposed supervisor, may come across a problem that can be researched by the investigator. • Reading assignments in textbooks, research reports and term papers • Academic experience: • Exposure to field situations: • Brain storming: Intensified discussions within a group of interested persons may help initiate important question • Research: research on one problem may suggest problem for further research • Intuition: Sometimes, new ideas may strike to one’s mind like a flash. Reflective mind is a spring of knowledge. Techniques involved in defining the problem • Understanding the origin and nature of the problem clearly. The best way of understanding the problem is to discus it with those who first raised it in order to find out how the problem originally came about and with what objectives in view. • Survey and examining the available literature related to the problem thoroughly. This helps to know what data and other materials, if any are available for operational purpose and to narrow the problem as well as the technique that might be used. Techniques Cont…. • Developing idea through discussions with colleagues and other experienced personalities. This quite often known as an experience survey. Discussions with such people help the researcher: • Rephrasing the research problem (reformulation of the problem) in to analytical or operational propositions. At this stage, the researcher is required to put the problem in specific terms as possible. Evaluation of the Problem • Feasibility of the problem has to be tested with regard to personal suitability of the researcher and social value of the problem. • In short, the research problem should be evaluated in terms of the following criteria: • Is the problem researchable? Some problem cannot be effectively solved through the process of research. • Is the problem new? As much as possible, the research problems need to be new. One should not target his investigation to the problem that has already been thoroughly investigated by other researchers. Evaluation Cont… • Is the problem significant? The question of significance of the problem usually relates to what a researcher hopes to accomplish in a particular study. – What his /her purpose in undertaking to solve the particular problem selected/chosen? – What new knowledge does he/she hopes to add to the sum total of what is known? – And what value is this knowledge likely to have? Evaluation Cont… • Is the problem feasible for the particular researcher? Research problem should also be examined from the point of researcher’s personal aspect. – Research competency: the problem should be in an area in which the researcher is qualified and competent. • The researcher has to make sure that he/she is familiar with the existing theories, concepts, laws and related to the problem. • He/she must also posses the necessary skills and competence that may be needed to develop, administer, and interpret the necessary data gathering tools. Is the problem feasible for the particular researcher? Cont… – Interest and enthusiasm: the researcher has to make sure that the problem really interests him/her. He/she must also be truly enthusiastic about the problem. – Financial consideration: research is an expensive endeavor, which requires a great deal of money invest. In this regard, the researcher should ascertain whether he has necessary financial resources to carry on the investigation of the selected problem. – Time requirement: research should be undertaken within a given scope of time, which was allocated, with careful analysis of the prevailing situation. Each and every of research process require time. Cont…. • Administration consideration: the researcher has to pay attention to all administrative matter that is necessary to bring his/her study to its full completion. • In this regard the researcher should consider kinds of data, equipment, specialized personnel and administrative facilities that are needed to complete study successfully. • The researcher must assure whether the pertinent data are available and accessible to him/ her. Hypothesis
• The word hypothesis is a compound of two
words, ‘hypo’ and ‘thesis’. • Hypo means, under or below and thesis means a reasoned theory or national viewpoint. • The term hypothesis is defined as a proposition that is stated in a testable form and predicts a particular relationship between two or more variables. Hypothesis: Necessary or not? • Is the formulation of useful hypotheses always necessary and possible? • Despite its importance, can hypotheses be set up in all cases? • In a mere fact-finding investigation, no problems may be raised and the need for formulating hypotheses may not arise. • Similarly, it may not be possible to set up a hypothesis in exploratory studies because the very purpose of this study may be to formulate a hypothesis. • However, in all analytical and experimental studies, hypothesis should be set up in order to give a proper direction to them. Source of Hypothesis • Professional Experience: The daily life experience or the day to day observation of the relationship (correlation) between different phenomena. • Past Research or Common beliefs: Hypothesis can also be inspired by tracing past research or by commonly held beliefs. • Through direct analysis of data or deduction from existing theory: Hypothesis may also be generated through direct analysis of data in the field or may be deducted from a formal theory. • Technological and social changes: Directly or indirectly exerts an influence in the function of an organization. All such changes bring about new problems for research. Types of Hypothesis Hypotheses are classified in to several ways: Based on their function • Descriptive hypothesis: These are propositions that describe the characteristics (such as size, form or distribution) of a variable. The variable can be an object, person, organization, situation or event • Relational hypothesis: Such hypotheses describe the relationship between two variables. The relationship can be positive or negative – in case of correlation study • Causal hypothesis: These hypotheses state that the existence or the change in one variable causes or leads to an effect on another variable. The first variable is called an independent variable while the second is a dependent variable. In this respect, the direction the relationships flow should be noted, i.e., which is cause and which is effect- in case of causal study Forms of stating hypothesis • The statement of a research hypothesis can take declarative (positive) form, negative form, the null form or the question form. Examples on Positive form • H1: The academic achievements of extroverts is significantly higher than that of introverts • H2: Students who learn in small class size will perform significantly better in mathematics test than who learn in large class size • H3: Teaching children through programmed instructional material will decrease their test anxiety. Examples on Negative form • H1: The academic achievements of extroverts is not significantly higher than that of introverts • H2: Students who learn in small class size will not perform significantly better in mathematics test than who learn in large class size • H3: Teaching children through programmed instructional material will not decrease their test anxiety. Forms of stating hypothesis…Cont Examples on Null form • H1: There is no significant difference between the academic achievements of extroverts and introverts • H2: There is no significant difference between students who learn in small class size and those who learn in large class size in performing a mathematics test. • H3: Teaching children through programmed instructional material will have no effect on their test anxiety Examples on Question form • H1: Will the academic achievements of extroverts be higher than that of introverts? • H2: Will students who learn in small class size perform better in mathematics test than who learn in large class size? • H3: Will teaching children through programmed instructional material decrease their test anxiety? Characteristics of hypothesis • Hypothesis should be; • Clear and precise. • Capable of being tested. • State relationship between variables, if it happens to be a relational hypothesis. • Limited in scope and must be specific. • Stated as far as possible in most simple terms • Consistent with most known facts Thanks !