Dependency Theories were developed in the 1950s to explain uneven global development. There are two main approaches - the North American Neo-Marxist view and the Latin American Structuralist view. The theories argue that peripheral, less developed nations are economically dependent on core nations and receive an unequal distribution of wealth. Peripheral nations primarily export raw materials and rely on manual labor, while core nations industrialize, process materials, and sell finished goods back at higher prices. This exploitative relationship prevents peripheral nation development, according to Dependency Theorists.
Dependency Theories were developed in the 1950s to explain uneven global development. There are two main approaches - the North American Neo-Marxist view and the Latin American Structuralist view. The theories argue that peripheral, less developed nations are economically dependent on core nations and receive an unequal distribution of wealth. Peripheral nations primarily export raw materials and rely on manual labor, while core nations industrialize, process materials, and sell finished goods back at higher prices. This exploitative relationship prevents peripheral nation development, according to Dependency Theorists.
Dependency Theories were developed in the 1950s to explain uneven global development. There are two main approaches - the North American Neo-Marxist view and the Latin American Structuralist view. The theories argue that peripheral, less developed nations are economically dependent on core nations and receive an unequal distribution of wealth. Peripheral nations primarily export raw materials and rely on manual labor, while core nations industrialize, process materials, and sell finished goods back at higher prices. This exploitative relationship prevents peripheral nation development, according to Dependency Theorists.
• Dependecy Theories was Developed by Hans Singer and Raul Prebish in
1950s and Has been improved since then. • They are Two main sub theories, The North American Neo-Marxist approach and the Latin American Structuralist approach
Core nations and Pheripheral Nations
• Pheripheral Nations are less developed and receive an unequal
distribution of the worlds wealth. • have very little industrialization • They typically have unstable governments, inadequate social programs, and are economically dependent on core nations for jobs and aid. Core nations • are dominant capitalist countries, technological, and urbanized • and more industrialized nations who receive the majority of the world’s Wealth.
• Dependency Theorists saw that the development of peripheral nations is
Stagnant Because of the exploitative nature of the core nations • Less Developed Periphery Countries are said to primarily serve the interests of the wealthier Countries and end up having little to no resources to put toward their own development What’s the Point of the Theory? • The Economics of periphery countries rely on manual labor and to the expert and to the export of raw materials to core nations. • Then the Core Countries Process these raw materials and sell them at a much higher price. And some of these manufactured goods back to the periphery Countries from which the raw materials came • Peripehery nations end up spending more money on the processed goods. • Some Countries were not developing around the world because the international System was Actually preventing them from doing so.