The document discusses leadership styles and roles within aircraft crews. It defines a crew as a structured group united by a common objective and organized hierarchically. Roles are defined by each member's functions and status is determined by rank. Optimal crew cohesion occurs under a synergistic leadership style where the captain makes decisions with crew input and support, coordinates activities, and develops skills. Less effective styles include autocratic where the captain imposes decisions without consultation and laissez-faire where the captain remains passive.
The document discusses leadership styles and roles within aircraft crews. It defines a crew as a structured group united by a common objective and organized hierarchically. Roles are defined by each member's functions and status is determined by rank. Optimal crew cohesion occurs under a synergistic leadership style where the captain makes decisions with crew input and support, coordinates activities, and develops skills. Less effective styles include autocratic where the captain imposes decisions without consultation and laissez-faire where the captain remains passive.
The document discusses leadership styles and roles within aircraft crews. It defines a crew as a structured group united by a common objective and organized hierarchically. Roles are defined by each member's functions and status is determined by rank. Optimal crew cohesion occurs under a synergistic leadership style where the captain makes decisions with crew input and support, coordinates activities, and develops skills. Less effective styles include autocratic where the captain imposes decisions without consultation and laissez-faire where the captain remains passive.
• The concept of group or team , comprising members united by a
common objective , accepted by all and organized into hierarchical structure. • However even in a group, each member complies his own image of world, resulting in an enormous varieties of human interaction. • To reduce this problem, companies defines a status for each member of the group and terms reference for each. • All known “who does what” • THE ROLE: roles are defined by the functions individuals fulfil and their contribution for the group. CONT… • The status: A “status” implies a hierarchical organization of positions recognized by all members in the group. Status is normally vested in a rank occupied ( captain, first officer, etc ) • Cohesion amongst the crew: cohesion can be defined as the sum of the forces which tend to bind crew member together. It saves time and energy. Group cohesion is a major advantage In case of difficulty or danger. THE AUTHORITY GRADIENT AND LEADERSHIP STYLES • There are several styles of leadership -The autocratic cockpit -The Laissez-faire Cockpit -The Synergistic Cockpit (The Ideal) The autocratic cockpit CONT… • Autocratic transmission of an order will be perceived as aggression, making the receiver tense • Authoritarianism can create opposition by a crew member and lead to a tension • Autocratic Cockpit • Decides and imposes his decisions without consultation. • Takes no account of the opinions of the other members of the crew. • Encourages a tense and non-communicative atmosphere in the cockpit • Considers forcefully made suggestions as either criticism or insubordination The cause of autocratic cockpit • The difference in seniority and technical ability between the captain and other flight crew members is too great • The captain is a very strong personality, naturally authoritarian, and the copilot has weak assertiveness • The captain lacks self-confidence The Laissez-faire Cockpit CONT… • Remains passive. • Allows other members of the crew freedom in decision-making. • Makes few suggestions. • Makes neither positive or negative judgments. • Has a primary aim to please the rest of the crew • Encourages a relaxed and laid-back atmosphere in the cockpit with communications leaning towards non-professional subjects. • The cause is -when the captain is working with competent pilots and other flight crews Self-centered Cockpit CONT… • A “self-centered” cockpit is thus created which offers the least synergy and is the most dangerous of the cockpit situations. • Each keeps himself to himself, takes no interest in what others are doing but believes all others know what he doing . • There is a high risk of ambiguity and misunderstandings in communication. • This types of situation occurs in the transient period after a conflict The Synergistic Cockpit (The Ideal) CONT… • The captain makes the decision but with the help and active participation of other crew members. • Motivates the crew. • Develops the skills of the crew. • The plan of action is defined by the complete group. • Supports team working. • Coordinates interrelated activities concerning the flight • Openly shows appreciation for work well done • Monitors the crew performance and gives constructive advice to the crew members