Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT
Module 5
Group K-W-L Chart
Before the
module:
4
LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT
INTRODUCTION TO LANGUAGE
ASSESSMENT
Session 1
In this session you will learn:
a. What is a language assessment
b. Assessment of Learning (AoL) and
Assessment for Learning (AfL)
c. What to test?
d. Characteristics of a good test
LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT
INTRODUCTION TO LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT
Activity 1
PPT 5.1.1
By the end of the activity, you will
be able to:
8
brainstorming
1. What assessment concepts do you know?
2. Which assessment types enhance learning?
Why?
3. Which types have you experienced so far?
4. Do you think assessment can improve her/his
teaching?
How can we compare assessment to a
Swiss army knife? Explain. 11
Assessment purposes
• To measure development
• To diagnose where learners are
• To measure proficiency
• To gain feedback on our teaching
• To give feedback to our learners
• To report to external bodies for evaluation, monitoring
• To certify language proficiency
• To regulate entrance to programmes (high stakes)
• To compare learners
• To maintain standards
Activating Your
Schemata
Source: labspace.open.ac.uk
Assessment Literacy
The typical teacher spends a third to half of his/her professional time (Herman and
Dorr-Bremme, 1982; Stiggins and Conklin, 1992; Cheng 2001)
Only half of teacher education programs include a course on assessment skills and the
50 percent that do include any assessment don’t cover the skills completely (Schafer
1993).
17
What does it mean to be “assessment literate”?
https://www.surveymonkey.com/user/sign-in/
18
References
• Ainslee, S. 2004. Measuring Learning. In Harnisch H. & Swanton P. (Eds.)
Adults learning languages: A CILT guide to good practice. 93-112.
• •Brown, A. 1994. Book Review Evaluation by Rea-Dickens & Germaine. In
RELC Journal (25), 137-140.
• •Dlaska, A. & Krekeler, C. 2009. Sprachtests im Fremdsprachenunterricht.
Hohengehren: Schneider.
• •Douglas, D. 2010. Understanding Language Testing. London: Hodder.
• •Lynch B. 2003. Language assessment and programme evaluation.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• •Mann, S. 2004. Evaluation. In Harnisch H. & Swanton P. (Eds.) Adults
learning languages: A CILT guide to good practice. 113-129.
• •Rea-Dickens, P. & Germaine, K. 1992. Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
URLs
• http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/
2_learntch/briefing_papers/
methods_assessment.pdf
• http://www.ealta.eu.org/guidelines.htm