Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part 1
By
Osama Atef Ezz El Regal
Part 1
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Intraoral Objectives
A.intra- arch (objectives & Adjustments)
a)Individual Tooth Positions
b)first order
c)Second order ,Radiographs
d)Third order
B.inter-arch (objectives & Adjustments)
a)Tooth size discrepancy
b)Midline Discrepancies
c)Excessive Overbite
d)Anterior Open Bite
Introduction
Arch wire
The next-to-last 17 × 25 beta-titanium (beta-ti) 21 × 25 martensitic nickel–
wire satisfactory titanium (m-niti) best choice
(for step bends)
The final wire 17 × 25 steel (stiffer) 21 × 25 beta-ti (stiffer)
(for torque)
Intraoral Objectives
Intra-Arch (objectives & Adjustments)
Occlusal mirror to
• identify minor rotations
• buccolingual displacement outside the
perfect arch form
Intraoral Objectives
Intra-Arch (objectives & Adjustments)
Panoramic Radiograph
Panoramic Radiograph
• Problems of second-order
angulation are commonly
found in
1. the upper lateral incisors
2. lower premolars
3. teeth adjacent to the
extraction sites.
• Problems might be related to
1. abnormal tooth morphology
2. bracketing errors
Radiographic Objectives
Periapical radiographs
• Indicated only when any significant findings is observed in the panoramic
radiograph
• to obtain a more detailed view
such as:
1. extensive root resorption
2. Evidence of periodontal bone loss
3. root parallelism between teeth adjacent to an implant site
Intraoral Objectives
Intra-Arch (objectives & Adjustments)
The torquing
auxiliary
“piggyback arch”
Intraoral Objectives
Intra-Arch (objectives & Adjustments)
A. 21 × 25 beta-Ti wires
• usually the best
• This wire’s torsional stiffness is less than that of 17 × 25 steel
• but the shorter inter-bracket distances with 22-slot twin brackets bring its
performance in torsion close to that of the smaller steel wire.
Intraoral Objectives
Intra-Arch (objectives & Adjustments)
As a general guideline
• from Bolton analysis the threshold for clinical significance of
tooth size discrepancy is 2 mm.
• So more than 2mm discrepancy will necessitate steps to deal
with it during treatment. And not be delayed at the finishing
stage
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
2- Laminate veneers
• should be delayed because bonding and debonding may damage the it’s surface
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
1. third-order bends
2. slightly tipping teeth
3. finishing the ortho. treatment with mildly excessive overbite
4. finishing the ortho. treatment with mildly excessive overjet
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
• Midlines should be coincident.
• Affect interocclusal relationships in how the posterior teeth fit together
• >2 mm discrepancy should be treated in the early phases of treatment.
• If not 1–2 mm or more discrepancy between the midlines will result in
• an improper interocclusal relationship, at least in one of the buccal
segments
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
• The midline objectives should be evaluated in the intraoral and extraoral
finishing category ( specially the upper arch ).
• it is undesirable esthetically to displace the maxillary midline, bringing it
around to meet a displaced mandibular midline.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
• Minor midline discrepancies
not a great problem
Midline Discrepancies
• This can result from
1. Improper planning or mechanics
2. Dental Cause
3. Skeletal Cause
4. Mandibular shift
5. Incisal Cant.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
Can Result from
1- Improper planning or mechanics
a) a preexisting midline discrepancy that was not
completely resolved at an earlier stage of treatment
b) asymmetric closure of spaces within the arch.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
Can result from
2- Skeletal Cause
• Skeletal asymmetry
• it may be impossible to correct it orthodontically
• the treatment should be camouflage or surgical correction
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
3- Dental Cause
• usually not severe
• caused only by lateral displacements of maxillary or
mandibular teeth
• that accompanied by a mild Class II or Class III relationship
on one side.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
3- Dentally
can be corrected by (1 - 2mm)
• the range of correction for each arch is approximately 1 mm to
each side.
• Tipping is the major type of tooth movement that can be used
to correct midlines
• Treated by anterior cross elastics.
• Or a combination of Class II elastics on one side and Class III
on the other can be used.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
Class II or Class III and anterior cross elastic
should be reserved for small discrepancies
long term use side effect occur in the vertical and transverse planes
• the vertical component of the anterior cross elastic force cause canting of the
occlusal planes
• In The Transverse plane, rotation of the dental arches around the y axis with the use
of Class II/Class III elastics may result in a crossbite tendency on one buccal segment
and a Brodie bite tendency on the other
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
CIII CII
Midline Discrepancies ELASTICS ELASTICS
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
4- Mandibular shift
• Arise easily if a slight discrepancy in the transverse position of
posterior teeth is present.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
Example 1.
• A narrow maxillary right posterior segment
• can lead to a shift of the mandible to the left on final closure,
creating the midline discrepancy.
Can be treated by
• by correcting the transverse arch relationships
• by (careful coordination of the maxillary and mandibular
archwires, reinforced by a posterior cross-elastic).
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
Example 2.
• If the entire maxillary arch is slightly displaced transversely relative
to the mandibular arch
• so the teeth are in excellent relationships in occlusion, but there is a
lateral shift to reach that position.
The treatment
• involve posterior cross-elastics but in a parallel pattern
• (i.e., from maxillary lingual to mandibular buccal on one side and the
reverse on the other side).
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Midline Discrepancies
5- Incisal Cant. can Affect midline
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Excessive Overbite
• Before correction
• why the problem exists ?
• evaluate two things:
1. The vertical relationship between the upper lip and maxillary incisors
2. Anterior face height.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Excessive Overbite
1- The vertical relationship between the upper lip and maxillary incisors
Excessive Overbite
2- Anterior face height.
With Short facial height
• elongating the posterior teeth slightly (the lower posterior teeth)
would be acceptable
With Long facial height
• intrusion of incisors would be needed.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Excessive Overbite
For example:
1. a stabilizing trans-palatal arch needed
2. cutting the rectangular finishing arch wire distal to the lateral
incisors
3. Making two segment anterior segment and buccal segment
4. install an auxiliary intrusion arch
5. That is tied to this Anterior segment in the appropriate place
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Excessive Overbite
Lingual arch or TPA
1. is to controls transverse relationships prevent excessive distal
tipping of the maxillary molars
2. The greater the vertical change in incisor position needed
3. The more important to have a stabilizing lingual arch in place and
vice versa.
4. Small corrections do not require a lingual arch or TPA.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Excessive Overbite
if slight elongation of the posterior teeth is indicated
1. step bends in a flexible arch wire would be satisfactory.
2. The arch wire before the final finishing arch wire is used for
these step bends
3. (17 × 25 TMA with the 18-slot appliance, 21 × 25 M-NiTi
with the 22-slot appliance).
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)
Excessive Overbite
or
1. An auxiliary depressing arch for
overbite correction can be effective
2. The continuous base arch wire is
should be a relatively small round wire
3. not preferred approach for a slight
overbite correction.
Intraoral Objectives
Inter-Arch Analysis (objectives & Adjustments)