Notes MICROECONOMICS

MICROECONOMICS
by Robert S. Pindyck
Daniel Rubinfeld
Ninth Edition
Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Chapter 6
Production CHAPTER OUTLINE

In this chapter and the next we 6.1 Firms and Their Production
discuss the theory of the firm, Decisions
which describes how a firm
makes cost-minimizing 6.2 Production with One Variable
production decisions and how Input (Labor)
the firm’s resulting cost varies 6.3 Production with Two Variable
with its output. Inputs
6.4 Returns to Scale
LIST OF EXAMPLES
6.1 The Authors Debate a
Production Function for
Health Care 197
6.2 Malthus and the Food Crisis
The Production Decisions of a Firm
The production decisions of firms can be understood in three steps:
1. Production Technology: How inputs (such as labor, capital, and raw materials) can be
transformed into outputs.
2. Cost Constraints: How inputs (such as labor, capital, and raw materials) can be
transformed into outputs.
3. Input Choices: Just as a consumer is constrained by a limited budget, the firm is
concerned about the cost of production and the prices of labor, capital, and other
inputs.
theory of the firm Explanation of how a firm makes cost-minimizing production decisions
and how its cost varies with its output.

6.1 Firms and Their Production Decisions
(1 of 3)
Why Do Firms Exist?
Firms offer a means of coordination that is extremely important and would be sorely
missing if workers operated independently.
Firms eliminate the need for every worker to negotiate every task that he or she will
perform, and bargain over the fees that will be paid for those tasks.
Firms can avoid this kind of bargaining by having managers that direct the production of
salaried workers—they tell workers what to do and when to do it, and the workers (as well
as the managers themselves) are simply paid a weekly or monthly salary.

(2 of 3)
The Technology of Production
factors of production Inputs into the production process (e.g., labor, capital, and
materials).
We can divide inputs into the broad categories of labor, materials and capital, each of which
might include more narrow subdivisions.
Labor inputs include skilled workers (carpenters, engineers) and unskilled workers
(agricultural workers), as well as the entrepreneurial efforts of the firm’s managers.
Materials include steel, plastics, electricity, water, and any other goods that the firm buys
and transforms into final products.
Capital includes land, buildings, machinery and other equipment, as well as inventories.

(3 of 3)
The Production Function
production function Function showing the highest output that a firm can produce for every
specified combination of inputs.
q  F (K, L) (6.1)
Production functions describe what is technically feasible when the firm operates efficiently—that
is, when the firm uses each combination of inputs as effectively as possible.
The Short Run versus the Long Run
short run Period of time in which quantities of one or more production factors cannot be
changed.
fixed input Production factor that cannot be varied.
long run Amount of time needed to make all production inputs variable

6.2 Production with One Variable Input
(Labor) (1 of 7)
Average and Marginal Products
average product Output per unit of a particular input.
marginal product Additional output produced as an input is increased by one unit.
Remember that the marginal product of labor depends on the amount of capital used.
If the capital input increased from 10 to 20, the marginal product of labor most likely would
increase.
Average product of labor = Output/labor input = q/L
Marginal product of labor = Change in output/change in labor input = ∆q/ ∆ L

6.2 Production with One Variable Input (Labor)
(2 of 7)
TABLE 6.1: PRODUCTION WITH ONE VARIABLE INPUT
AVERAGE
AMOUNT OF AMOUNT OF MARGINAL
TOTAL OUTPUT (q) PRODUCT
LABOR (L) CAPITAL (K) PRODUCT (∆q/∆L)
(q/L)
0 10 0 — —
1 10 15 15 15
2 10 40 20 25
3 10 69 23 29
4 10 96 24 27
5 10 120 24 24
6 10 138 23 18
7 10 147 21 9
8 10 152 19 5
9 10 153 17 1
10 10 150 15 -3
11 10 143 13 -7
12 10 133 11.08 -10

(3 of 7)
The Slopes of the Product Curve
FIGURE 6.1 (1 OF 2)
PRODUCTION WITH ONE VARIABLE INPUT
The total output curve in (a) shows the output produced for
different amounts of labor input.
The average and marginal products in (b) can be obtained

(using the data in Table 6.1) from the total product curve.
At point A in (a), with 3 units of labor, the marginal product

is 29 because the tangent to the total product curve has a
slope of 29.
The average product of labor, however, is 23, which is the

slope of the line from the origin to point A. Also, the
marginal product of labor reaches its maximum at this
point.
At point B, with 5 units of labor, the marginal product of

labor has dropped to 24 and is equal to the average
product of labor.

(4 of 7)
The Slopes of the Product Curve
FIGURE 6.1 (2 OF 2)
PRODUCTION WITH ONE VARIABLE INPUT
Thus, in (b), the average and marginal product curves
intersect (at point D).
Note that when the marginal product curve is above the
average product, the average product is increasing.
When the labor input is greater than 5 units, the marginal
product is below the average product, so the average
product is falling. Once the labor input exceeds 9 units, the
marginal product becomes negative, so that total output
falls as more labor is added.
At C, when total output is maximized, the slope of the
tangent to the total product curve is 0, as is the marginal
product.
Beyond that point, the marginal product becomes
negative.

(5 of 7)
The Average Product of Labor Curve
In general, the average product of labor is given by the slope of the line drawn from the
origin to the corresponding point on the total product curve.
The Marginal Product of Labor Curve
In general, the marginal product of labor at a point is given by the slope of the total product
at that point.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AVERAGE AND MARGINAL PRODUCTS
In Figure 6.1, the average product is the slope of the line from the origin, 0B, and the
marginal product is the tangent to the total product curve at B (note the equality of the
average and marginal products at point D).
The slope of the tangent to the total product curve at any point between B and C is lower
than the slope of the line from the origin.

(6 of 7)
The Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
law of diminishing marginal returns Principle

that as the use of an input increases with other
inputs fixed, the resulting additions to output will
eventually decrease.
FIGURE 6.2
THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGICAL

IMPROVEMENT
Labor productivity (output per unit of labor) can

increase if there are improvements in
technology, even though any given production
process exhibits diminishing returns to labor.
As we move from point A on curve O1 to B on

curve O2 to C on curve O3 over time, labor
productivity increases.
Example 6.1 The Authors Debate a
Production Function for Health Care
Expenditures on health care have increased rapidly in
many countries. Do these increased expenditures reflect
increases in output or do they reflect inefficiencies in the
production process?
Bob argues that the primary explanation is the fact that

the production function for health care exhibits
diminishing returns. Dan argues that the production of
health care in the United States is inefficient.
FIGURE 6.3 A PRODUCTION FUNCTION FOR HEALTH

CARE
Additional expenditures on health care (inputs) increase

life expectancy (output) along the production frontier.
Points A, B, and C represent points at which inputs are

efficiently utilized, although there are diminishing returns
when moving from B to C.
Point D is a point of input inefficiency.

Example 6.2 Malthus and The Food Crisis
(1 of 2)
The law of diminishing marginal returns was central to TABLE 6.2 INDEX OF WORLD
the thinking of political economist Thomas Malthus FOOD PRODUCTION PER CAPITA
(1766–1834).
YEAR INDEX
Malthus predicted that as both the marginal and
1961–64 100
average productivity of labor fell and there were more
mouths to feed, mass hunger and starvation would 1965 101
result. 1970 105
Malthus was wrong (although he was right about the 1975 106
diminishing marginal returns to labor). 1980 109
Over the past century, technological improvements 1985 115

have dramatically altered food production in most 1990 117
countries (including developing countries, such as
1995 119
India). As a result, the average product of labor and
total food output have increased. 2000 127
2005 135
Hunger remains a severe problem in some areas, in
part because of the low productivity of labor there. 2010 146
2013 151

Example 6.2 Malthus and The Food Crisis (2 of 2)
FIGURE 6.4
CEREAL YIELDS AND THE WORLD PRICE OF FOOD
Cereal yields have increased. The average world price of food increased temporarily in the early 1970s
but has declined since.

6.2 Production with One Variable Input
(Labor) (7 of 7)
Labor Productivity
labor productivity Average product of labor for an entire industry or for the economy as a
whole.
PRODUCTIVITY AND THE STANDARD OF LIVING
Consumers in the aggregate can increase their rate of consumption in the long run only by
increasing the total amount they produce. Understanding the causes of productivity growth
is an important area of research in economics.
We do know that one of the most important sources of growth in labor productivity is growth
in the stock of capital
stock of capital Total amount of capital available for use in production.
technological change Development of new technologies allowing factors of production to

be used more effectively.

Example 6.3 Labor Productivity and The
Standard of Living
Will the standard of living in the United States, Europe, and
Japan continue to improve, or will these economies barely keep
future generations from being worse off than they are today?
Because the real incomes of consumers in these countries
increase only as fast as productivity does, the answer depends
on the labor productivity of workers.
TABLE 6.3: LABOR PRODUCTIVITY IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES

Blank Cell UNITED STATES JAPAN FRANCE GERMANY UNITED KINGDOM
Blank Cell GDP PER HOUR GDP PER HOUR GDP PER HOUR GDP PER HOUR GDP PER HOUR
WORKED (IN 2010 WORKED (IN 2010 WORKED (IN 2010 WORKED (IN 2010 WORKED (IN 2010
U.S. DOLLARS) U.S. DOLLARS) U.S. DOLLARS) U.S. DOLLARS) U.S. DOLLARS)
Blank Cell $62.41 $39.39 $60.28 $58.92 $47.39
YEARS ANNUAL RATE OF ANNUAL RATE OF ANNUAL RATE OF ANNUAL RATE OF ANNUAL RATE OF
GROWTH OF LABOR GROWTH OF LABOR GROWTH OF LABOR GROWTH OF LABOR GROWTH OF LABOR
PRODUCTIVITY (%) PRODUCTIVITY (%) PRODUCTIVITY (%) PRODUCTIVITY (%) PRODUCTIVITY (%)
1970-1979 1.7 4.5 4.3 4.1 3.2
1980-1989 1.4 3.8 2.9 2.1 2.2
1990-1999 1.7 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.3
2000-2009 2.1 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.5
2010-2014 0.7 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.5

6.3 Production with Two Variable Inputs
(1 of 8)
Isoquants
Isoquants Curve showing all possible combinations of inputs that yield the same output.
TABLE 6.4: PRODUCTION WITH TWO VARIABLE INPUTS

LABOR INPUT
CAPITAL INPUT 1 2 3 4 5
1 20 40 55 65 75
2 40 60 75 85 90
3 55 75 90 100 105
4 65 85 100 110 115
5 75 90 105 115 120
ISOQUANT MAPS
isoquant map Graph combining a number of isoquants, used to describe a production

function.

6.3 Production with Two Variable Inputs (2 of 8)
FIGURE 6.5
PRODUCTION WITH TWO VARIABLE

INPUTS
FIGURE 6.2
A set of isoquants, or isoquant map,
describes the firm’s production function.
Output increases as we move from isoquant
q1 (at which 55 units per year are produced at
points such as A and D), to isoquant q2 (75
units per year at points such as B), and to
isoquant q3 (90 units per year at points such
as C and E).
By drawing a horizontal line at a particular level of capital—say 3, we can observe
diminishing marginal returns. Reading the levels of output from each isoquant as labor is
increased, we note that each additional unit of labor generates less and less additional
output.

Input Flexibility
Isoquants show the flexibility that firms have when making production decisions: They can
usually obtain a particular output by substituting one input for another. It is important for
managers to understand the nature of this flexibility.
Diminishing Marginal Returns
Even though both labor and capital are variable in the long run, it is useful for a firm that is
choosing the optimal mix of inputs to ask what happens to output as each input is
increased, with the other input held fixed.
Because adding one factor while holding the other factor constant eventually leads to lower
and lower incremental output, the isoquant must become steeper as more capital is added
in place of labor and flatter when labor is added in place of capital.
There are also diminishing marginal returns to capital. With labor fixed, the marginal
product of capital decreases as capital is increased.

Substitution Among Inputs
marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) Amount by which the quantity of one input can be
reduced when one extra unit of another input is used, so that output remains constant.
MRTS = −Change in capital input/change in labor input
= (for a fixed level of q)
DIMINISHING MRTS
Additional output from increased use of labor =
Reduction in output from decreased use of capital =
Reduction in output from decreased use of capital =
(MPL ) (ΔL) + (MPK )(ΔK ) = 0
Now, by rearranging terms we see that

(MPL ) (MPK ) = - (ΔK/ΔL) = MRTS (6.2)

FIGURE 6.6
MARGINAL RATE OF TECHNICAL

SUBSTITUTION
FIGURE 6.2
Like indifference curves, isoquants are
downward sloping and convex. The slope of
the isoquant at any point measures the
marginal rate of technical substitution—the
ability of the firm to replace capital with labor
while maintaining the same level of output.
On isoquant q2, the MRTS falls from 2 to 1 to
2/3 to 1/3.

Production Functions—Two Special Cases
Two extreme cases of production functions show the possible range of

input substitution in the production process: the case of perfect substitutes and the fixed
proportions production function, sometimes called a Leonitief production function.
fixed-proportions production function Production function with L-shaped isoquants, so

that only one combination of labor and capital can be used to produce each level of output.
The fixed-proportions production function describes situations in which methods of

production are limited.

FIGURE 6.7
ISOQUANTS WHEN INPUTS ARE

PERFECT SUBSTITUTES
When the isoquants are straight lines, the

MRTS is constant. Thus the rate at which
capital and labor can be substituted for each
other is the same no matter what level of
inputs is being used.
Points A, B, and C represent three different

capital-labor combinations that generate the
same output q3.

FIGURE 6.8
FIXED-PROPORTIONS PRODUCTION
FUNCTION
When the isoquants are L-shaped, only one

combination of labor and capital can be used
to produce a given output (as at point A on
isoquant q1, point B on isoquant q2, and point
C on isoquant q3). Adding more labor alone
does not increase output, nor does adding
more capital alone.

Example 6.4 A Production Function for
Wheat (1 of 2)
Food grown on large farms in the United States is
usually produced with a capital-intensive technology.
However, food can also be produced using very little
capital (a hoe) and a lot of labor (several people with
the patience and stamina to work the soil).
Most farms in the United States and Canada, where

labor is relatively expensive, operate in the range of
production in which the MRTS is relatively high (with
a high capital-to-labor ratio), whereas farms in
developing countries, in which labor is cheap,
operate with a lower MRTS (and a lower capital-to-
labor ratio).
The exact labor/capital combination to use depends

on input prices, a subject that we discuss in Chapter
7.

Example 6.4 A Production Function for Wheat
(2 of 2)
FIGURE 6.9
ISOQUANT DESCRIBING THE

PRODUCTION OF WHEAT
A wheat output of 13,800 bushels per year
can be produced with different combinations
of labor and capital.
The more capital-intensive production
process is shown as point A, the more labor-
intensive process as point B.
The marginal rate of technical substitution
between A and B is 10/260 = 0.04.

6.3 Returns to Scale (1 of 3)
returns to scale Rate at which output increases as inputs are increased proportionately.
INCREASING RETURNS TO SCALE
increasing returns to scale Situation in which output more than doubles when all inputs
are doubled.
CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE
constant returns to scale Situation in which output doubles when all inputs are doubled.
DECREASING RETURNS TO SCALE
decreasing returns to scale Situation in which output less than doubles when all inputs
are doubled.

Describing Returns to Scale
Returns to scale need not be uniform across all possible levels of

output. For example, at lower levels of output, the firm could have increasing returns to
scale, but constant and eventually decreasing returns at higher levels of output.
In Figure 6.10 (a), the firm’s production function exhibits constant returns. Twice as much of
both inputs is needed to produce 20 units, and three times as much is needed to produce
30 units.
In Figure 6.10 (b), the firm’s production function exhibits increasing returns to scale. Less
than twice the amount of both inputs is needed to increase production from 10 units to 20;
substantially less than three times the inputs are needed to produce 30 units.
Returns to scale vary considerably across firms and industries. Other things being equal,
the greater the returns to scale, the larger the firms in an industry are likely to be.

FIGURE 6.10 RETURNS TO SCALE
When a firm’s production process exhibits However, when there are increasing returns
constant returns to scale as shown by a to scale as shown in (b), the isoquants move
movement along line 0A in part (a), the closer together as inputs are increased along
isoquants are equally spaced as output the line.
increases proportionally.
Example 6.5 Returns to Scale in the Carpet
Industry
Innovations have reduced costs and greatly increased carpet
production. Innovation along with competition have worked
together to reduce real carpet prices.
Carpet production is capital intensive. Over time, the major

carpet manufacturers have increased the scale of their
operations by putting larger and more efficient tufting
machines into larger plants. At the same time, the use of
labor in these plants has also increased significantly. The
result? Proportional increases in inputs have resulted in a
more than proportional increase in output for these larger
plants.
Most smaller carpet manufacturers have found that

small changes in scale have little or no effect on output.
We can therefore characterize the carpet industry as one

in which there are constant returns to scale for relatively
small plants but increasing returns to scale for larger
plants.

Notes MICROECONOMICS

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notes MICROECONOMICS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MICROECONOMICS

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Production CHAPTER OUTLINE

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

The Short Run versus the Long Run

fixed input Production factor that cannot be varied.

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

average product Output per unit of a particular input.

marginal product Additional output produced as an input is increased by one unit.

Average product of labor = Output/labor input = q/L

Marginal product of labor = Change in output/change in labor input = ∆q/ ∆ L

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

The average and marginal products in (b) can be obtained

At point A in (a), with 3 units of labor, the marginal product

The average product of labor, however, is 23, which is the

At point B, with 5 units of labor, the marginal product of

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

The Marginal Product of Labor Curve

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AVERAGE AND MARGINAL PRODUCTS

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

law of diminishing marginal returns Principle

THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGICAL

Labor productivity (output per unit of labor) can

As we move from point A on curve O1 to B on

Bob argues that the primary explanation is the fact that

FIGURE 6.3 A PRODUCTION FUNCTION FOR HEALTH

Additional expenditures on health care (inputs) increase

Points A, B, and C represent points at which inputs are

Point D is a point of input inefficiency.

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Over the past century, technological improvements 1985 115

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

CEREAL YIELDS AND THE WORLD PRICE OF FOOD

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

PRODUCTIVITY AND THE STANDARD OF LIVING

stock of capital Total amount of capital available for use in production.

technological change Development of new technologies allowing factors of production to

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

TABLE 6.3: LABOR PRODUCTIVITY IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

TABLE 6.4: PRODUCTION WITH TWO VARIABLE INPUTS

isoquant map Graph combining a number of isoquants, used to describe a production

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

PRODUCTION WITH TWO VARIABLE

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Diminishing Marginal Returns

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

MRTS = −Change in capital input/change in labor input

= (for a fixed level of q)

Additional output from increased use of labor =

Reduction in output from decreased use of capital =

Reduction in output from decreased use of capital =

(MPL ) (ΔL) + (MPK )(ΔK ) = 0

Now, by rearranging terms we see that

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

MARGINAL RATE OF TECHNICAL

Copyright © 2018 Pearson Education, Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Two extreme cases of production functions show the possible range of

fixed-proportions production function Production function with L-shaped isoquants, so

The fixed-proportions production function describes situations in which methods of