Professional Documents
Culture Documents
organizations
BY: HUMA AKRAM
Outline of the chapter
Diversity
Discrimination
Biographical characteristics
Other differentiating characteristics
Ability
Implementing diversity management strategies
Diversity
Intellectual abilities
are abilities needed to perform mental activities—thinking, reasoning, and problem solving. Most societies place a
high value on intelligence, and for good reason. Smart people generally earn more money and attain higher levels of
education. They are also more likely to emerge as leaders of groups.
However, assessing and measuring intellectual ability are not always simple.
People aren’t consistently capable of correctly assessing their own cognitive ability.
IQ tests are designed to ascertain a person’s general intellectual abilities
So, too, are popular college admission tests, such as the SAT and graduate admission tests in business (GMAT), law
(LSAT),and medicine (MCAT).
Intelligence dimensions are positively correlated, so if you score high on verbal comprehension, for example, you’re
more likely to also score high on spatial visualization.
The correlations aren’t perfect, meaning people do have specific abilities that predict important work-related outcomes
when considered individually.
However, they are high enough that researchers also recognize a general factor of intelligence, general mental ability
(GMA).
General mental ability (GMA) is an overall factor of intelligence, as suggested by the positive correlations among
specific intellectual ability dimensions
Jobs differ in the demands they place on intellectual abilities. Research consistently indicates a correspondence
between cognitive ability and task performance.
Where employee tasks are highly routine and there are few or no opportunities to exercise discretion, a high IQ is not
as important to performing well.
However, that does not mean people with high IQs cannot have an impact on traditionally less complex jobs
While intelligence is a big help in performing a job well, it doesn’t make people happier or more satisfied with their
jobs. Why not? Although intelligent people perform better and tend to have more interesting jobs, they are also more
critical when evaluating their job conditions. Thus, smart people have it better, but they also expect more
Physical abilities
The capacity to do tasks that demand stamina, dexterity, strength, and similar characteristics
Though the changing nature of work suggests intellectual abilities are increasingly important for many jobs,
physical abilities have been and will remain valuable.
Research on hundreds of jobs has identified nine basic abilities needed in the performance of physical tasks.
These are described in Exhibit 2-3.
High employee performance is likely to be achieved when the extent to which a job requires each of the nine
abilities matches the abilities of employees in that job.
In sum, organizations are increasingly aware that an optimally productive workforce includes all types of people
and does not automatically exclude anyone on the basis of personal characteristics
Implementing Diversity Management
Strategies
Having discussed a variety of ways in which people differ, we now look at how a manager
can and should manage these differences.
Diversity management makes everyone more aware of and sensitive to the needs and
differences of others.
This definition highlights the fact that diversity programs include and are meant for
everyone.
Attracting, Selecting, Developing, and Retaining Diverse Employees
One method of enhancing workforce diversity is to target recruitment messages to specific demographic groups
that are underrepresented in the workforce.
This means placing advertisements in publications geared toward those groups; pairing with colleges,
universities, and other institutions with significant numbers of underrepresented minorities
Research has shown that women and minorities have greater interest in employers that make special efforts to
highlight a commitment to diversity in their recruiting materials.
Diversity advertisements that fail to show women and minorities in positions of organizational leadership send a
negative message about the diversity climate at an organization.
Of course, to show the pictures, organizations must actually have diversity in their management ranks
Some companies have been actively working toward recruiting less represented groups.
The selection process is one of the most important places to apply diversity efforts.
Managers who hire need to value fairness and objectivity in selecting employees and focus on the productive
potential of new recruits.
When managers use a well-defined protocol for assessing applicant talent and the organization clearly prioritizes
nondiscrimination policies, qualifications become far more important in determining who gets hired than
demographic characteristics.
Individuals who are demographically different from their coworkers may be more likely to feel low commitment
and to leave, but a positive diversity climate can aid retention.
Many diversity training programs are available to employers, and research efforts are focusing on identifying the
most effective initiatives.
It seems that the best programs are inclusive in both their design and implementation.
A positive diversity climate should be the goal since all workers appear to prefer an organization that values
diversity.
Diversity in groups
Most contemporary workplaces require extensive work in group settings.
When people work in groups, they need to establish a common way of looking at and accomplishing the major tasks, and
they need to communicate with one another often.
If they feel little sense of membership and cohesion in their groups, all group attributes are likely to suffer.
In some cases, diversity in traits can hurt team performance, whereas in others it can facilitate performance.
Whether diverse or homogeneous teams are more effective depends on the characteristic of interest
Demographic diversity (in gender, race, and ethnicity) does not appear to either help or hurt team performance in general,
although racial diversity in management groups may increase organizational performance in the right conditions.
Teams of individuals who are highly intelligent, conscientious, and interested in working in team settings are more
effective. Thus, diversity on these variables is likely to be a bad thing—it makes little sense to try to form teams that mix
in members who are lower in intelligence or conscientiousness, and who are uninterested in teamwork.
In other cases, diversity can be a strength.
Groups of individuals with different types of expertise and education are more effective than
homogeneous groups.
Similarly, a group made entirely of assertive people who want to be in charge, or a group whose members
all prefer to follow the lead of others, will be less effective than a group that mixes leaders and followers.
Regardless of the composition of the group, differences can be leveraged to achieve superior performance.
The most important factor is to emphasize the similarities among members.
Managers who emphasize higher-order goals and values in their leadership style are more effective in managing
diverse teams
Effective Diversity programs
Organizations use a variety of diversity programs in recruiting and selection policies, as well as
training and development practices.
Effective, comprehensive workforce programs encouraging diversity have three distinct components.
First, they teach managers about the legal framework for equal employment opportunity and encourage
fair treatment of all people regardless of their demographic characteristics.
Second, they teach managers how a diverse workforce will be better able to serve a diverse market of
customers and clients.
Third, they foster personal development practices that bring out the skills and abilities of all workers,
acknowledging how differences in perspective can be a valuable way to improve performance for
everyone
Most negative reactions to employment discrimination are based on the idea that discriminatory treatment is unfair.
Regardless of race or gender, people are generally in favor of diversity-oriented programs, including affirmative
action programs (AAP), to increase the representation of minority groups and ensure everyone a fair opportunity to
show their skills and abilities.
Organizational leaders should examine their workforce to determine whether target groups have been underutilized.
If groups of employees are not proportionally represented in top management, managers should look for any hidden
barriers to advancement.
Managers can often improve recruiting practices, make selection systems more transparent, and provide training for
those employees who have not had adequate exposure to diversity material in the past.
The organization should also clearly communicate its policies to employees so they can understand how and why
certain practices are followed.
Communications should focus as much as possible on qualifications and job performance; emphasizing certain groups
as needing more assistance could backfire.
Learning
“Any relatively permanent change in behavior that occurs as a result of experience”
Theories of learning
Classical Conditioning
Operant Conditioning
Social learning
Classical conditioning
A type of conditioning in which an individual responds to some stimulus that would not ordinarily produce
such response
Discovered by Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov, classical conditioning is a type of unconscious or automatic
learning.
Classical conditioning can be used to explain why nursery rhymes often bring back pleasant
memories of childhood and feeling of euphoria.
In an organizational setting, we can also see the classical conditioning operating
For example: At one manufacturing plant, every time the top executives from the head office were
scheduled to make a visit, the plant management would clean up the administrative offices and wash
the windows. This went on for years. Eventually, employees would turn on their best behavior and
look prim and proper whenever the windows were cleaned-even in those occasional instances when
the cleaning was not paired with a visit from the top executives. People had learned to associate the
cleaning of windows with the visit from the head office.
Operant conditioning
Operant conditioning argues that behavior is a function of its consequences
People learn to behave to get something they want or to avoid something they don’t want
Operant behavior means voluntary or learned behavior in contrast to reflexive or unlearned behavior.
The tendency to repeat such behavior is influenced by the reinforcement or lack of reinforcement
brought about by the consequences of the behavior
Therefore reinforcement strengthens the behavior and increase the likelihood that it will be repeated
A type of conditioning in which desired voluntary behavior leads to a reward or prevents a
punishment.
Assume that your boss tells you that if you will work overtime during the next 3 week busy season
you will be compensated for it at next performance appraisal
However, when the performance appraisal time comes you find that you find that you are given no
positive reinforcement for your overtime work.
The next time your boss ask you to work overtime, what will you do?
You will probably decline!
Your behavior can be explained by operant conditioning
If the behavior fails to be positively reinforced, the probability that the behavior will be repeated
declines
Social learning
The view that we can learn from observation and direct experience is called social learning theory.
Individuals can learn by observing what happens to other people and just by being told about
something as well as through direct experiences
For example, much of what we have learned comes from watching models, parents, teachers, peers,
motion pictures, television performers, bosses and so forth
Shaping: A Managerial tool
Because learning takes place on the job as well as prior to it, managers are concerned with how they
can teach employees to behave in ways that most benefit the organization.
When we attempt to mold individuals by guiding their learning in graduated steps, we are shaping
behavior
Methods of shaping behavior
There are four methods to shape behavior through
Positive reinforcement ( Following a response with something pleasant)
Negative reinforcement (Following a response by the termination or withdrawal of something unpleasant)
Punishment (causing an unpleasant condition in an attempt to eliminate an undesirable behavior)
Extinction (When the behavior is not reinforced, it tends to be gradually extinguished)
Schedules of Reinforcement
There two major types of reinforcement schedules are continuous and intermittent
Continuous reinforcement schedule reinforces the desired behavior each and every time it is
demonstrated
With Intermittent reinforcement, not every instance of the desirable behavior is reinforced, but
reinforcement is given enough to make the behavior worth repeating
Behavior modification
Application of reinforcement concepts to individuals in the work setting is called OB mod
Typical OB mod program follows a five step problem solving model
Identify critical behaviors
Develop baseline data
Identify behavioral consequences
Develop and implement an intervention strategy
Evaluate performance improvement