Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Francis Mokogwu
Presentation Outline
2
Introduction
3
Objectives
4
Methodology
5
Optimal Location for Hybrid Power Plant
Fig. 5. Daily Load Profile of Community Fig. 6. Daily Load Profile of Commercial
10
Load Load
Schematic Design
The Hybrid System is made up of:
11
Fig. 7. Schematic of the Hybrid System
Photovoltaic Array Specification (1)
A PV panel that generates an AC output is chosen to eliminate the need for
a an inverter. The table below presents the PV panel specifications.
Properties Quantity
Panel Type Flat plate
Rated Capacity(kW) 499.95
Temperature Coefficient (oC) -0.4100
Nominal Operating Cell Temperature (oC) 45
Efficiency (%) 17.30
Manufacturer SolarMax
Ground Reflection (%) 20
De-rating Factor (%) 96
Panel Slope (degrees) 43.22o
12
Table. 1. Properties of PV Array
Photovoltaic Array Specification (2)
The capital cost increases linearly with the increase in capacity (kW). The
gradient of replacement cost decreases with the increase in capacity.
13
Fig. 8. PV Panel Cost Curve
Wind Turbine Specification (1)
The generated output of the chosen wind turbines is AC and is transmitted directly
to the common AC bus bar in the system. This is an “island” system i.e. no storage
(battery) facility.
Properties Quantity
Name Eocycle EOX M-21 [100kW]
Rated Capacity(kW) 100
Hub height (m) 32
Lifetime (years) 30
Rotor diameter (m) 21
Cut-in speed (m/s) 2.75
Cut-out speed (m/s) 20
17
Fig. 10. Optimization Simulation Result
Optimized Result Analysis (2)
Optimized Model Characteristics:
500kW PV capacity
2 pieces of 100kW wind turbine
88.3kW hydropower plant
20,000kW local grid
18
Fig. 11. Optimized Design for the Hybrid System
Optimized Result Analysis (3)
Optimized Model Characteristics: Energy Source kWh/yr %
SolarMax PV 806,983 42.8
500kW PV capacity M-21 Wind 129,558 6.87
turbine
2 pieces of 100kW wind turbine
Hydro 922,570 48.9
88.3kW hydropower plant Local grid 28,090 1.49
20,000kW local grid Total 1,887,202 100
19
Fig. 12. Monthly Average Electric Production
Optimized Result Analysis (4)
Economic Evaluation
The system total cost for 25 years lifetime is $153,529.94.
Component Capital ($) Replacement O&M ($) Fuel ($) Salvage ($) Total ($)
($)
21
References
[1] “HOMER2_2.8_HelpManual”, Accessed: Apr. 15, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://www.homerenergy.com/pdf/HOMER2_2.8_HelpManual.pdf
[2] “Hydrology Data Explorer,” Department for Environment Food & Rural
Affairs. http://environment.data.gov.uk/hydrology/station/a3e609ce-8ecf-43e1-
a1f3-c6c5cc2786b3 (accessed Apr. 15, 2022).
22
“