Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elect Annually
Court of Directors
24
Governor
Directors
King Commission
• First commission issued by Queen Elizabeth on
24th Jan 1601 to its Captain for the first voyage
• Company invoked the Crown’s Prerogative and
used to secure from it a commission to the
commander-in-chief of each voyage separately.
• Empowering for inflict punishment to criminal
offence using “LAW MARTIAL”
• King James I in 1615 obviate the practice of
granting separate royal commission for each
voyages by conferring on a company a
general power to issue commissions to its
captains.
• Purpose: in case of capital offences e.g. willful
murder and mutiny, a jury of 12 servants of the
company will give the verdict.
• Gregory Lellington trial in 1616 for killing
Henry Barton, an Englishmen. He was
convicted on his own confession and was
sentenced to death.
• James I in 1623 granted to the company the
power of issuing a commission to any of its
presidents in its settlements authorizing him
to punish offences committed on Land by the
British Subjects, after a trial by Jury.
Treaty: EIC and Mughal Emperor Jhangir
President and
its council
Merchants
Administrative power
controlled by
No legal Senior Factors Executive
Knowledge
Judicial Power
Factors Controlled by
Executive
Writers
English Settlement at Madras
• Reason for Settlement: Near the established textile weavers' communities. Textiles
produced in the region were internationally sought-after, and were exported to Central Asia,
• Treaty Between Local Raja and Crown 1639 to establish factory and govern Village of
Madraspatnam.
• Condition: To pay half of the customs and revenues of the port to Raja
• New Settlement was name as Fort St. George and was managed by Agent and Council.
• Whole establishment later on named as White Town and Village of Madraspatnam as Black
Town
Administration of Justice: First Phase
• Admiralty Court:
o Established in November 1684;
o St. John was appointed as Judge
o Admiralty cases, maritime cases, Civil and
Criminal cases
• King’s Bench of Common Pleas
o Vaux was appointed as judge
o Civil and Criminal Cases
Administration of Justice: Fourth Stage
• Court of Judicature
o Composition: Chief Justice, An Englishmen + 9
Judges (5 Englishmen + 4 Indians)
o 3 English Judges formed the Quorum
o Jurisdiction: Civil and Criminal Case, Maritime
cases, testamentary cases
o Presided once in a week
o Court can give any punishment except death
penalty
Rama Kamti Case
• Rama Kamti was a rich and influential person who was also
the supporter of the company.
• On a charge that he was a friend with pirate chief Angria,
Kamti was arrested.
• Trial was held before Governor Boone and his council.
• No conclusive evidence against Kamti and some of the
evidences were forged.
• Witness were tortured to give e the statement against Kamti
• Kamti was found guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment
for indefinite period.
Administration of Justice in Calcutta
• On 24 August 1690 near River Hoogly, EIC established Fort
William for its factory
• In 1698 Prince Azim-us-Shan grandson of the emperor
Aurangzeb granted Zamidari rights of three villages; Calcutta,
Sutanati and Govindpur to EIC.
• Company appointed the collector to control the administration of
three villages who was the member of the council.
• Collector started holding zamidari court for both civil and
criminal cases
• In some cases trial was conducted in Madras.
• In 1699, Calcultta after becoming the presidency appointed
Governor and Council which were given administrative and
judicial powers.
Justice in Criminal Case
• Company decided to follow Mughal system such as
Faujdari Court presided by English Collector who
was given power to decide criminal case of the
natives of Calcutta, Sutanati and Govindpur .
• Capital punishment was not awarded unless it is
confirmed by Governor and its Council.
• The court also took cognizance of petty crimes
committed by English People and for major crimes
the Governor and council was authorized to take
cognizance of the matter.
Justice in Civil Cases
• Collector presided over the court of Cutchery.
• Collector decided cases in a summary way on
the basis of the prevailing customs and the
usage of the country or according to the
natural justice and equity.
• In exceptional cases only appeals were
allowed to Governor in Council.