You are on page 1of 37

CARLOSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

General Orientation
for SY 2022-2023

Monalisa H.Corpuz
Speaker

Commitment to Excel in Service


CRN 44 100 18 93 0045
CARLOSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
General Guidelines
on the Opening of
Classes Including
Student Uniform

Commitment to Excel in Service


CRN 44 100 18 93 0045
CARLOSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DEPED ORDER
No.65,s.2010
The wearing of a school uniform
shall not be required
in public schools.Students with
existing uniforms may continue
using these uniform,if they so
desire,to avoid incurring additional
costs for new attire.

Commitment to Excel in Service


CRN 44 100 18 93 0045
DASHBOARD
Enrollment
Project
Q1 Q2 3

K-3 95 95 95

4-6
Total
67
162
67
162
67
162
PAN-
PPA’s Di -Basa
 Project ComMot

(Communicate and Motivate)

Drop -Out Best Practice


REAH
Key Q1 2 3
Stage
K-3 0 0 0
0 0
(Reading Extension
IV-VI 0
at Home)
PPA’s
 Project Check and Connect

GOVERNAN
ACCESS QUALITY CE
Commitment to Excel in Service
ACCESS
Struggles brought by pandemic to the current education
system does not hinder Carlosa Elementary School in
providing quality education by making sure every school
activities are easily accessible to the learners and
parents’ while keeping up with the standards of DepEd’s
Oplan Balik Eskwela program.

Commitment to Excel in Service


ACCESS
ENROLMENT
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter
Grade Level
M F T M F T M F T
Kindergarten 6 15 21 6 15 21 6 15 21
Grade 1 11 18 29 11 18 29 11 18 29
Grade 2 9 8 17 9 8 17 9 8 17
Grade 3 16 12 28 16 12 28 16 12 28
KS1 42 53 95 42 53 95 42 53 95
Grade 4 12 18 30 12 18 30 12 18 30
Grade 5 8 7 15 8 7 15 8 7 15
Grade 6 11 11 22 11 11 22 11 11 22
KS2 31 36 67 31 36 67 31 36 67

TOTAL 73 89 162 73 89 162 73 89 162

The table shows that the number of enrolled learners from first quarter to third quarter is sustained.
E
Enrolment Quarter 1-3
R 180
162

O 160
140

L 120
100 95
86

L 80
60 49 46
67
76

M 40
20 15
21 18
11
29
9 8
17 16 12
28
18
12
30
8 7
15 11 11
22
37
30

6
E 0
K I II III KS 1 IV V VI KS 2 Total

N Male Female Total

Commitment to Excel in Service


 Project ComMot
(Communicate and Motivate)
Target Strategies Time Accomplishm Gaps Challenges Intervention Ways
frame ents Forward

All school age Posting of School 100% or Some areas Parents Sending All
learners should enrolment year 162 in the don’t have letters and target
receive process in round learners barangay enough Modified learners
messages , calls facebook enrolled on don’t have time to Learners were
or chat on page, time a stable enroll their Enrolment enrolled
Facebook sending mobile children and Survey to the
messenger or message phone due to Form (MLESF) school
Facebook page through signal and work load to the sitio of
about the facebook internet the barangay
enrolment Parents
messenger connection that have the
process have no
by grade least means
level. available of
cellphone
communicati
to use.
on

Commitment to Excel in Service


Project ComMot
(Communicate and Motivate)

Commitment to Excel in Service


ACCESS
ACCESS (All children of School Age in School)

Transferred Out Transferred In


Grade Level Male Female Total Grade Level Male Female Total

Kindergarten 0 0 0 Kindergarten 0 0 0
Grade 1 0 0 0 Grade 1 0 0 0
Grade 2 0 0 0 Grade 2 0 0 0
Grade 3 0 0 0 Grade 3 0 0 0
Grade 4 0 0 0 Grade 4 0 0 0
Grade 5 0 0 0 Grade 5 0 0 0
Grade 6 0 0 0 Grade 6 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0
DROP OUT
ACCESS
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
EOSY 2021-2022 BOSY 2021-2022

Male Female Total

1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter


Grade Level
M F T M F T M F T
Kindergarten 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

The table shows the zero-dropout rate from first to third quarter in all grade
levels.
 Project Check and Connect
Target Strategies Time Accomplishm Gaps Challenges Intervention Ways
frame ents Forward

100% or 162 Every end of School Zero None None None The school
learners received a the quarter year dropout rate continued
call or text from the teacher round (0%) was providing
the teachers will post an attained good
appreciating their appreciation from quarter relationship
outputs and message in 1 to quarter to parents
reminding them different 3 in all grade and
that they belong social media levels. learners.
to the group. platform.

180 162 162162


160 Q1 Q2 Q3
140
120
0% dropout rate 100
from Q1-Q3 in all 80
grade levels 60
40 21 21 21 29 29 29 28 28 28 30 30 30 22 22 22
17 17 17 15 15 15
20
0
K I II III IV V VI TOTAL

Commitment to Excel in Service


Best Practice on Access
Online Kumustahan

Commitment to Excel in Service


CRN 44 100 18 93 0045
QUALITY
Education must always be at its best. CES
ensures that the quality of education was not
compromised for the sake of continuing. We
provide programs and projects that are relevant
to the needs of the learners in the current
situation.

Commitment to Excel in Service


 Project PAN- Di- Basa
Time Accomplishm Ways
Target Strategies Gaps Challenges Intervention
frame ents Forward
100% or 162 Keep parents School The learners Learners Parents did Encourage Learners
learners learn updated with year received does not not the parents are
to read and the round different have supervise to supervise motivat
comprehend at performance printed motivation their the learners ed to
home of the learners reading in reading children’s in their study read
through the materials reading habits. and
use of time practice
Printed
kumustahan in their
reading
facebook basic
group materials reading
both English
messenger. skills.
and Filipino
Print reading and
materials both distributed it
in English and to the
Filipino learners.
Make reading
materials
colorful and
creative

Commitment to Excel in Service


ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
EDUKASYON SA PAGPAPAKATAO
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding
Number of
Number of
Learners at
ENROLMEN Very Fairly Learners Who
Gra Satisfactory Risk of Failing
Key Stages

T Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet


de 98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) (with 3 or
(85-89) (75-79) Expectations
Leve more failed
(Below 75)
l subjects)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3

I 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 7 17 17 17  9 6  5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 1

II 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4  10 9 10  7 5 3  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25  28 28 3  0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
74 74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 35 45 54 30 24 14 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

                                                   

IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 15  15 17 15  15 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 2

V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 4 6  6 3 1  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 16  18 13 6  4 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 39 42 34 27 30 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

l
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
MTB
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding

Number of
Number of
Gra ENROLMEN Learners at
Key Stages

Very Fairly Learners Who


de T Satisfactory Risk of Failing
Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet
Leve 98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) (with 3 or
(85-89) (75-79) Expectations
l more failed
(Below 75)
subjects)

Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3

I 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 7 11 12 18 13 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 1

II 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 8 13 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 15 16 12 10 12 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
74 74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 26 27 31 35 43 26 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

l
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
ENGLISH
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding
Number of
Number of
Learners at
Gra ENROLMENT Very Fairly Learners Who
Key Stages

Satisfactory Risk of Failing


de Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet
98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) (with 3 or
Leve (85-89) (75-79) Expectations
more failed
l (Below 75)
subjects)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3

I 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0  6   0 0  16 0  0   7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 1

II 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4  4 10 9  11 7 4  2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5  8 10 11  6 18 12 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tota
74 74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 18 20 20 33 25 16 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

                                                   
IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 10 19 18 20 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 2

V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 8 7 5 1 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11 11 15 9 9 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 25 29 41 32 30 10 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

l
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
FILIPINO
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding
Number of
Number of
Learners at
Gra ENROLMEN Very Fairly Learners Who
Key Stages

T Satisfactory Risk of
de Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet
98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) Failing (with 3
Lev (85-89) (75-79) Expectations
or more failed
el (Below 75)
subjects)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3

I 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  6  6 0  17 1 9 0  6  4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 1

II 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4  4 12 10  12 2 3  1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25  26 28 3  2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tota
74 74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 35 36 40 30 33 2 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

                                                   
IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12 17 16 14 10 8 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 2

V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 8 5 3 4 6 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 9 16 12 12 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 28 34 37 29 26 15 10 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

l
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
ARALING PANLIPUNAN
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding
Number of
Number of
Learners at
Gra ENROLMEN Very Fairly Learners Who
Key Stages

T Satisfactory Risk of Failing


de Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet
98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) (with 3 or
Leve (85-89) (75-79) Expectations
more failed
l (Below 75)
subjects)

Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3

I 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 5  13 12 18  9 10  6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 1

II 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3  3 6 10  11 7 4  3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 22 28 7  6 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
74 74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 30 47 29 35 16 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

                                                   
IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 15 17 13 12 6 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 2

V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 8 8 3 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 6 16 15 15 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 20 29 41 36 30 12 11 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

l
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
MATHEMATICS
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding
Number of
Number of
Learners at
Gra ENROLMEN Very Fairly Learners Who
Key Stages

T Satisfactory Risk of Failing


de Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet
98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) (with 3 or
Leve (85-89) (75-79) Expectations
more failed
l (Below 75)
subjects)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3

I 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 7 13 13 16  11 11 6  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 1

II 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3  5 11 13  12 6 1  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22  23 28 6  5 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
74 74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 30 35 52 32 33 17 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

                                                   
IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 12 17 18 13 8 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 2

V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 7 5 8 2 7 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 7 16 14 14 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 19 26 38 40 29 18 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

l
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
MAPEH
                                                   

Number of Learners Who Passed


Outstanding

Number of
Number of
Learners at
Gra ENROLMEN Very Fairly Learners Who
Key Stages

T Satisfactory Risk of Failing


de Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet
98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) (with 3 or
Leve (85-89) (75-79) Expectations
more failed
l (Below 75)
subjects)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3

I 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7  8 16 18  15 6 4 6  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 1

II 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3  4 5 14  13 12 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21  24 28 7  4 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
74 74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 31 36 49 39 32 18 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

                                                   
IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11 14 18 15 12 6 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 2

V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 1 5 5 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11 11 16 10 10 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 30 33 35 30 27 13 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

l
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
SCIENCE
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding
Number of
Number of
Learners at
Gra ENROLMEN Very Fairly Learners Who
Key Stages

T Satisfactory Risk of Failing


de Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet
98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) (with 3 or
Leve (85-89) (75-79) Expectations
more failed
l (Below 75)
subjects)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6  19 23  22 9 0 2  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

Tota
28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 19 28 26 23 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

                                                   
IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 11 15 18 15 12 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 2

V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 8 5 1 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 9 17 12 12 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 17 27 40 35 28 20 15 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

l
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
EPP
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding Number of
Number of
Gra ENROLMEN Learners at
Key Stages

Very Fairly Learners Who


de Satisfactory Risk of Failing
T Satisfactory Satisfactory Did Not Meet
Leve 98-100 95-97 90-94 (80-84) (with 3 or
(85-89) (75-79) Expectations
l more failed
(Below 75)
subjects)
Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3
Key Stage 2

IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 12 19 17 18 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 9 5 4 4 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13 13 11 8 8 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 31 34 35 29 30 8 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

ACHIEVEMENT RATE PER QUARTER


KINDERGARTEN

ENROLMENT Bilang ng Mag-aaral


Key Stage

Grade Level Konsistent (K) Papaunlad (P) Nagsisimula (N)

First Second Third First Second Third First Second Third First Second Third
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter

Key Stage
Kindergarten 21 21 21 0  13 18   2  5 3  19  3  0
1
ACHIEVEMENT RATE BY LEARNING AREA
FINAL RATING
                                                   
Number of Learners Who Passed
Outstanding Number of
Number of
ENROLLME Learners at
Gra Fairly Learners Who
Key Stages

NT Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Risk of


de Satisfactory Did Not Meet
98-100 95-97 90-94 (85-89) (80-84) Failing (with 3
Lev (75-79) Expectations
or more failed
el (Below 75)
subjects)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3

I 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 7  14 15  16 9 7 6  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 1

II 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 14 13 14 2 2  1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

III 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7  8 19 24  35 22 17 5  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
74 74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 15 17 33 37 52 47 42 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

                                                         
IV 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 12 17 16 16 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Key Stage 2

V 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 8  6 3  4 7 4 3  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VI 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10  10 16 11  11 1 1 1  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota
67 67 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 30 30 39 30 31 10 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 

O% failure rate in all learning areas from first to third quarter .


Number of learners who exhibited very satisfactory and outstanding performance in all
learning areas from quarter 1 to quarter 3 increases.
GOVERNAN
CE
Stakeholders are a vital part of every school activities’
success. CES ensures that every stakeholder who
contributes and give a hand are well acknowledged
while keeping and ensuring that the standard health
protocols are observed.

Commitment to Excel in Service


CRN 44 100 8 93 0045
MOOE STATUS OF ALLOCATION AND UTILIZATION
GOVERNANCE
Financial Report September 2021-April 2022
Maintenance and Other Operation Expenses

Mobile load
School/ ICT supplies
Semi-expandable
Equipment, 7% Office Supplies
Mobile data, 4% Janitorial Supplies
School
forms, 2% Teacher materials for Instruction
Medical and Health supplies
School forms
Medical and Semi expandable Equipment
School/ICT
Health sup-
Supplies,
plies, 15% Mobile load – 8,000
22%
School/ ICT supplies – 42, 565
Teacher ma- Office Office Supplies – 15, 530
terials for Supplies, Janitorial Supplies – 21, 000
instruction 8% Teacher materials for instructions –
31% Janitorial
Supplies, 60,445
11% Medical and Health supplies – 28,
500
School forms – 4, 260
Semi expandable Equipment – 13,
500
TOTAL – 193,800

Commitment to Excel in Service


MOOE SUPPLIES
GOVERNANCE

Commitment to Excel in Service


CRN 44 100 18 93 0045
 PPAs Adopt-a-School :
Project PINK (Paper and INK)
Time Accomplish
Target Strategies Gaps Challenges Intervention Ways Forward
frame ments
Encourage The school School Some None Retrieval of Sending Inadequate
both will send a year stakeholde stakeholders’ emails and modules,
internal letter of round r donates response follow-ups answer
and partnership papers were delayed were done to sheets, and
external to different and inks update the LEAP were
stakeholder stakeholders that was stakeholders. supplied
s to be a within the later on
partner in community used for
the PINK several
Project. school
projects
and
activities.

Commitment to Excel in Service


Commitment to Excel in Service
DONATIONS
ADOPT – A SCHOOL PROGRAM
( 1ST QUARTER TO 3RD QUARTER)

Donations Amount

PSB SEF 254,833


PINK Project 18,150
Handwashing 16, 400
Facility
Health Supplies 4,745
Painting Materials 4,030
LSB SEF 1,700
TOTAL 299,858
ADOPT – A SCHOOL PROGRAM
( 1ST QUARTER TO 3RD QUARTER)
BEST PRACTICES
Governance
Best practices
Reading Extension At Home (REAH)
 Distribution of Reading materials both English and Filipino.

Conducted Online Registration used social media platforms


and LESF for enrolment dissemination.

Commitment to Excel in Service


Accomplishments
Construction of
Handwashing facility

Painting
of
fence

Painting
of
Bench
Continuous Improvement
is better than
Delayed Perfection
-anonymous

Carlosa ES

You might also like