You are on page 1of 49

Ecological Profiling: Building LGU

Database
CDP+ Course 1

KRISTINE CARMEN D. DIONES


Bureau of Local Government Development
Department of the Interior and Local Government

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”


Course Objectives

You are expected to develop the following competencies after this


course:

✔ Organize, process, and analyze CDP data requirements


✔ Differentiate analytical tools and their uses in planning
✔ Identify and develop a list of appropriate indicators of development or
underdevelopment for the LGU using the processed and analyzed CDP data
requirements
✔ Create a baseline using the identified indicators in the CDP Data Process and
Analysis
Course Outline

Module 1: Ecological Profile Overview

Module 2: Steps in Ecological Profile

Module 3: Benchmarking of Indicators


Course Overview
Major Activities Output Documents Lead Office/Persons
1. Ecological Profiling 1. Ecological Profile (Form 1c) 1. City/Municipal Planning
a. Determining 2. Local Development Team
vision-reality gap Indicator System/RaPIDS a. Correctly and
b. Generating new (Form 1d) comprehensively profile
information their respective
c. Extracting sectors.
intelligence b. Consult with members
of each sector and
inform them of the
result of the profile and
validate the same.
c. Participate in all
activities as identified in
the approve workplan.
Course Overview
Planning Scenario Process
Scenarios 1 and 2 1. Analyze the LGU situation
a. Integrate the CDRA results into the EP by embedding the CDRA
results in each of the sectors and inserting the CDRA data as part
of the EP.
Scenario 3 2. Analyze the LGU Situation
a. Sectoral studies (Volume 3) of the enhanced CLUP can be an
alternative to the risk-informed EP.
Scenario 4 Check whether risk and vulnerability information and analysis are
included in the EP or CDP. If not, follow steps for Scenarios 1 and 2.
Module 1: Ecological Profile Overview
CDP+ Course 1

KRISTINE CARMEN D. DIONES


Bureau of Local Government Development
Department of the Interior and Local Government

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”


EP Formulation in the CDP Process
What is an Ecological Profile?

Basic reference about all possible aspects of


the locality.

Picture of the Current Realities of the Locality


(A Picture, A Snapshot, A Selfie)

Merger of the socio-economic and


biophysical profiles of the study area
and treat these subjects on equal
footing

Highlights the balance between


socio-economic and physical development,
and ecological and environmental
Importance of EP in Planning

Primary function is to provide an overall picture of the current


1
“reality” of the locality

Serves as an inventory of key baseline data and information


2
of the locality

Determines current capacities (i.e. assets, resources,


3
institutional structures, etc.)

Facilitates an evidence-based approach in identifying


4
problems/issues
Key Actors in EP Formulation / Updating

All LGU Sectoral or


department/ functional
offices/ committees
units

All Barangays
within LGU NGAs
jurisdiction operating
Civil Society within
Organizations the
and The locality
Academe
Minimum Contents of the EP

1. Population and Social Profile (Social Sector)

Five 2. Local Economy (Economic Sector)

Development 3. Infrastructure, Facilities, Utilities


(Infrastructure Sector)
Sectors
4.Geo Physical Environment
(Environmental Sector)

5. Institutional Capability
(Institutional Sector)
Minimum Contents of the EP

Population and Social Profile


A. Population and Demography Profile
• Social Composition and Characteristics
• Population size and growth size
B. Social Profile
• Health and Nutrition
• Education
• Social Welfare and Development
• Housing
• Public Order and Safety
• Sports and Recreation
Minimum Contents of the EP
Local Economy
A. Primary Sector
• Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry
B. Secondary Sector (Manufacturing and Industry)
• Mining and Quarrying
• Forestry
• Manufacturing
• Construction
• Electricity, Gas, and Water
C. Tertiary Sector
• Commerce and Trade
• Tourism
Minimum Contents of the EP
Infrastructure and Physical Base
A. Mobility and Circulation Network
B. Communication Facilities
C. Water Supply
D. Electric Power Supply
E. Flood Control and Drainage Facilities
F. Other Infrastructure Facilities
(public market, cemetery,
slaughterhouse)
Minimum Contents of the EP
Environment and Natural Resource
Management
A. Geo-Physical Environment
• Geographical Location
• Political Boundaries
• Topography
• Geology
• Climate Projections
• Natural Hazards/Constraints and Climate Adjusted
Hazards
Minimum Contents of the EP
Environment and Natural Resource
Management
B. Natural Resources
• Land Resources
• Mineral Resources
• Freshwater resources
• Coastal Resources
C. Environmental Management
• NIPAS
• Surface water by class
• Solid Waste Management
• Wastewater
• Air Quality
• Green House Gas Emissions
Minimum Contents of the EP
Institutional Development
A. Local Government Structure
• Organization structure of the LGU
• Staffing of LGU offices/departments
• Local Special Bodies
• NGAs operating in the LGU
B. Local Fiscal Management
• Status of financial health
• Revenues by sources
• Actual expenditures by general account
C. Development Legislation
• Inventory of resolutions/ordinances passed/enacted
• Inventory of outputs of Sanggunian
D. LGU-CSO Private Sector Linkages
• List of all partners
Sample Outline of an EP
Chapter I. History
Chapter II. Geo-Physical Environment
Chapter III. Population and Social Profile
Chapter IV. Local Economy
Chapter V.
Infrastructure/Utilities/Facilities
Chapter VI. Local Institutional Capability
Chapter VII. Climate and Disaster Risk
Assessment Information
Possible Sources of Data
1. Day-to-day transactional and functional activities of
the LGUs/Barangays
2. Inventories
3. Surveys
4. Census
5. Community-based Monitoring System (CBMS)
6. Plan and Post-Project Monitoring and Evaluation (M
& E) Results
7. Data Generated by Other LGU Offices/Departments
and National Government Agencies
8. Donor-funded Project Reports
9. Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA)
10. Seal of Good Local Governance
Community-Based Monitoring System

❑ An organized process of data collection and


processing at the local level and of integration
of data in local planning, program
implementation, and impact monitoring
❑ required to be established in all cities and
municipalities according RA 11315 of 2019 or the
CBMS Act
❑ A system that promotes evidence-based
policymaking and policy-option
identification
Community-Based Monitoring System
Basic Needs Core Indicators
A. Health Proportion of children under 5 years old who died
Proportion of women who died due to pregnancy-related causes
B. Nutrition Proportion of children aged 0-5 years old who are malnourished
C. Housing Proportion of households living in makeshift housing
Proportion of households who are informal settlers
D. Water and Sanitation Proportion of households without access to safe water supply
Proportion of households without access to sanitary toilet facilities
E. Education Proportion of children aged 6-11 years old who are not attending elementary school
Proportion of children aged 12-15 years old who are not attending secondary school
Proportion of children aged 6-15 years old who are not attending school
F. Income Proportion of households with income below the poverty threshold
Proportion of households with income below the food (subsistence) threshold
Proportion of households who experienced hunger due to food shortage
G. Employment Proportion of persons in the labor force who are unemployed
H. Peace and Order Proportion of persons who are victims of crimes
EP as Main Entry Point for Risk-Informed CDP

The EP serves as the main entry point for


DRR-CCA mainstreaming.

Determines the situation of the LGU as


reflected by the five development sectors.

Making the EP risk-informed will provide a more


comprehensive scenario for the LGU especially as to
how risk and vulnerability affect the planning area.
Some of the tools used include CDRA, Impact Chain,
etc.
Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment
● Assessing Current Situation
○ Identify elements (systems of interest) vulnerable to impacts of climate
change, and at-risk to various hazards as part of existing capacities (supply
side)
○ Consider vulnerable and high-risk elements identified in the CDRA results
as part of the demand side in the demand analyses
○ Integrate proposed interventions for each decision area in the demand
analyses (i.e. When proposed intervention is relocation, additional new
housing constructions must be considered as part of the housing backlog)

● Projecting Future Requirements


○ Calculate future demand requirements based on the CDRA-adjusted
baseline data and information
○ Integrate CDRA benchmarks and targets in projecting future
requirements
Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment

Sector/Sub-Sector Classification Moderate to High-Risk Area


Population and Social Profile - Primary Schools 8.03 ha
Education
Secondary Schools 1.32 ha
Population and Social Profile - Barangay Health Stations 2 facilities
Health (BHS)
Population and Social Profile - Burial Grounds 7.44 ha
Health
Population and Social Profile - Housing Areas 51.78 ha
Housing
Local Economy - The Industrial Areas 0.78 ha
Secondary Sector
Module 2: Steps in Ecological Profile
CDP+ Course 1

KRISTINE CARMEN D. DIONES


Bureau of Local Government Development
Department of the Interior and Local Government

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”


Suggested process in Formulating LGUs EP

1. Prepare a CDP data checklist (includes all the minimum data requirements for CDP).
2. Set a meeting with the Planning Team to validate the availability of the needed data.
3. Discuss with the Planning Team the possible data sources for each sector.
4. After the meeting, each department shall collect/generate and process all the assigned
data for their department.
5. The Municipal/City Planning and Development Office shall consolidate all the collected
data.
6. If necessary, conduct a consultation meeting with stakeholders to verify the collected
data.
7. Analyze the data using the prescribed tools.
8. Determine the current and future requirements for each sector.
Local
Development
Indicator
System (LDIS)
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

An analytical tool that portrays information in three (3)


dimensions:

Topical/ Geographical
Temporal
Sectoral / Spatial
Dimension Dimension
Dimension
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

LDIS are expressed in terms of:

Ratio Proportion Percentage

Per Capita
Average
Share
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

LDIS can generate and determine:

Level of
Issues per Sector
Development and
and Sub-Sector
Underdevelopment

Indicators from
Success Indicator NGAs /
each Vision International
Descriptor Commitments
Rationalized
Planning
Indicator Data
Sets
(RaPIDS)
Rationalized Planning Indicator Data Set
(RaPIDS)

❑ RaPIDs is ONLY a set of indicators and datasets. LDIs is a


system of helping planners analyze planning indicators

❑ RaPIDs will still follow the general template of the LDIS.


The only difference is that the list of indicators has been
grouped based on area characteristics and priority
concerns
Rationalized Planning Indicator Data Set
(RaPIDS)

❑ It also added several indicators required by recent


statutes such as DRR/CCA indicators and indicators
used to articulate certain thematic and sectoral
concerns such as gender and conflict sensitivity.
❑ Indicators for specific ecosystems are also identified
(Lowland, Upland, Coastal, etc.)
❑ RaPIDS aims to address the issue on data gathering
by helping planners identify indicators that apply to them
and those that they really needed as compared to
prescribing a one size fits all data set which makes data
gathering very challenging at the onset.
Rationalized Planning Indicator Data Set
(RaPIDS)
3 “I”s in Analysis

Item,
Statistics, Information Intelligence

Indicators
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)
Planning Larger Smaller Spatial Units
Sector Indicator Area
Spatial A B C D
Unit

Social Population
growth rate

2017-2020 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0%

2020-2022 3.0% 2.9% 3.0% 2.1& 2.5% 2.9%

Literacy Rate

2017 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92%

2022 97% 88% 95% 92% 89% 94%

1. Items, Statistics, and, Indicators


Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)
Planning Larger Smaller Spatial Units
Sector Indicator Area
Spatial A B C D
Unit

Social Population
growth rate

2017-2020 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0%

2020-2022 3.0% 2.9% 3.0% 2.1& 2.5% 2.9%

Literacy Rate

2017 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92%

2022 97% 88% 95% 92% 89% 94%

2. Getting Information
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

Planning Larger Smaller Spatial Units


Sector Indicator Area Spatial Unit
A B C D

Social Population 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0%


growth
rate

Literacy Rate 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92%

2. Getting Information
Local Development Indicator System (LDIS)

□ Analysis can be extended further into determining appropriate


policy interventions
□ If negative implications predominate, then the
observed condition can be regarded as a problem. Formulate
either mitigate
policies that the inconvenience or solve the problem
permanently
□ If positive implications predominate, then the observed
condition may be regarded as a potential.

4. Exploring Implications – Asking question “so what”


Module 3: Benchmarking of Indicators
CDP+ Course 1

KRISTINE CARMEN D. DIONES


Bureau of Local Government Development
Department of the Interior and Local Government

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”


Benchmarking Process
Benchmarking Process

Sector Indicator Planning Area Standard/


Benchmark

Social Classroom-Students Ratio 1:60 1:40

Malnutrition Incidence 0 7% 0
to 5 years old

Crime Rate Index – 5% 8%


Non-Index – 12% 12%

3. Extracting Intelligence – Asking question “WHY”


Sources of Benchmarks/Standards

❑ Standards/Benchmarks set by National Government Agencies


❑ Targets set by the Province / Region (PDPFP / RDP)*
❑ Targets set in the Philippine Development Plan*
❑ International Commitments (e.g. SDGs)*
❑ Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) Indicators

* As applicable
Demo Video: Benchmarking Indicators
Simulation Exercise!

TASKS: 1. Based on your EP, CDRA, and other database, accomplish the LDIS
2. Identify and accomplish at least 3 indicators per Sector
FORM: CDP Form 1d: LDIS
REFERENCES: RaPIDS, EP, CDRA, CBMS, etc.
DURATION: 1 hr
Lecture Video
THANK YOU!

For more information:


Bureau of Local Government Development
Department of the Interior and Local Government
25th Floor, DILG-NAPOLCOM
Center, EDSA corner Quezon
Avenue, West Triangle, Quezon City
Trunkline: (02) 876-3453 local 4102
Tel No. (02) 929-9235 / 927-7852

You might also like