Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guidelines in Writing a
Research Paper
Title of a Research Paper
1. The title should be clear and specifically
stated.
2. The variables being investigated should
always be written as part of the title.
3. Certain form as of title phrasing such as a
“Study of …”, “An Analysis …”, “A Scientific
Study …”, “An Experimental Investigation
of …” and “A Preliminary Study of…” are to
be avoided. They are vague and not
acceptable for inclusion in a research title
Title of a Research Paper
4. Abbreviation, symbols or expressions
requiring superscripts, subscripts or other
special notations should be avoided.
5. The main concepts should be included like
subject matter, the place of the study, the
population involved and the period when
the data were gathered.
6. A two – or three – line title should be
arranged in inverted pyramid form as much
as possible.
Sample Titles:
1. It must not too long, not similar with related literature with
much quoted and excerpted ideas.
2. The first paragraph is intended to provide the readers a
mental readiness, thus giving them the information as to
what the problem of the research is all about. It introduces
the study and its justification.
3. The last paragraph is a sort of closing portion that arouses
the curiosity and interest of the readers to know the results
of the study.
4. May cite authorities but not almost all of the paragraphs
were taken as to the extent of copying and pasting.
Sample:
The test anxiety and Mathematics anxiety are increasingly being seen as factors
underpinning levels of motivation for academic performance. Many learners experience
Mathematics anxiety in our schools today. Reported consequences of being anxious toward
Mathematics include the avoidance of Mathematics and the decline in Mathematics
achievement.
This study will clearly see the relationship between Mathematics anxiety and the
academic performance of the students. This will understand more about Mathematics anxiety
and how it will affect the academic performance of the students.
✔
Statement of the Problem/
Objectives of the Study
1. State the general and specific objectives/problems that need to
be answered. The general statement is a reiteration of the title
of the study.
2. The statement should be state in the infinitive to (action words
in research) such as examine, analyze, determine, assess,
evaluate, find out and among others.
3. Objectives are stated specifically in simple language in
order to find it easy to measure
Sample:
Statement of the Problem:
Conceptual Framework
Variables Variables
Correlation
Variables Variables
Definition of Terms
✔
1. The definition of terms should be simple not too broad. There
are two ways of defining the key terms used in the study.
These are conceptual and operational definitions.
2. . It is advisable that the researcher should use two ways in
defining the terms to make the meaning clear.
3. The words should arrange in alphabetical manner.
4. Define the words included in the conceptual framework, SOP
or objectives and words used in the research title.
Sample:
Academic Performance refers to the performance of the
third year students of Sultan Kudarat State University after a
course of instruction which is measured in terms of their
grades in Mathematics subject.
.
✔
Review of Related Literature
and Related Studies
The functions of literature review are:
focuses on previous research;
shows how your study fills the “gap”;
the neccessity of your study; and
set boundaries.
. It is broken down into three parts: related legal basis, related
literature and related studies
✔
Review of Related Literature
and Related Studies
Your RRL answers the following questions;
What research has been done previously?
What have other said?
What is the relevance?
What is the difference?
Do researches agree or disagree one another?
Are there flaws?
Guidelines in Writing RRL
✔
Review of related literature should be essay type not cut and
paste those readings from the other authorities. Reading should
be taken as support to the ideas formulated in an essay writing
type not as a compilation.
Avoid using obvious words like “ayon kay” or “according to”.
Authorities could be cited before, within and after the sentence
lifted. Use connecting sentences to affirm or negate the other
authorities. For omitted words in the quoted ideas, use three
dots (…).
Guidelines in Writing RRL
✔
Only the family name of the author and year of the printed
reading appeared in the related lit.
Always have synthesis or clincher of the previous reading.
Related literature should not older than 10 years from its
publication (historical data are exceptional). It should not also
be less than 20 sources or references.
Guidelines in Writing RRL
It is suggested that the technical style in reference citations can be
✔
adopted such as follows:
John and Baucom (1990) as cited by Dudley (1995) identifies …
In 2006, Cruz made a survey on the …
Fantilanan (2011) studied …
Perez and Cruz (2009) postulated that …
It is stated that … are made (Coleta, 2011).
The following statements/phrases may help to express relevance of the
study:
The related literature included in this study has direct and significant relationship
under the study in the sense that …
The thesis of … is relevant to this study because the time and place is similar to …
This present study is similar to that of … in terms of …
Citing Sources:
“...For a situational leader to be effective, he must strike the
perfect balance between selling and telling...”
3 to 5 authors
1st Citation: Gomez, Burgoz, Zamora, Rizal &
Bonifacio (2018)
Succeeding Citation: Gomez et al. (2018)
6 authors
Gomez et al. (2018)
Review the literature; don't
reproduce it.
Proposal?
Parts of a Research Proposal
Introduction Review of Related Research
Literature and Methodology
Related Studies
•Background of the •Related Legal Basis •Research Design
Study
•Statement of the •Related Literature •Respondents of the
Problem/Objectives of Study/Sampling
the Study Technique
•Significance of the •Related Studies (Foreign •Locale of the Study
Study & Local)
•Scope and Delimitation •Data gathering
of the Study Instrument
•Definition of Terms •Data gathering
Procedure
•Statistical Treatment
Presentation of Findings
✔
1. This section includes data presentation, analysis and
interpretation as the title indicates.
2. The presentation of the results can be in the form of
narratives, table, graphs, etc.
3. The text and the table have different purposes but
they complement each other.
4. The textual discussion is to point only the highlights
of the information presented in the table.
Presentation of Findings
✔
5. A table should be followed soon after it is referred to
in the text.
6. Table title or figure’s caption must be clear.
7. The presentation must be sequenced based on the
SOP or Objectives of the Study.
8. Headings must be based on the SOP/Objectives in
concise declarative phrases.
✔
Summary, Conclusions and
Recommendations
1. Chapter 5 is mainly textual discussion.
2. Summary of Findings describes briefly in the first
two paragraphs the over all purpose and the design of
the study.
3. It is usually thematic and sequential according to the
order in the SOP/Objectives.
4. The themes reflect the questions asked under
SOP/Objectives.
Summary, Conclusions and
Recommendations ✔
5. Conclusion sections consists of generalizations
derived from the findings that have been
summarized.
6. Empirical evidences are no longer included.
7. Conclusions consists of paragraphs sequentially
presented consistent with the sequence in presenting
the findings. Paragraph headings are not included
Summary, Conclusions and
Recommendations ✔
8. Recommendations section is made up of a series of
paragraphs. Specific recommendations are given first
followed by the general recommendations then,
finally, the recommendations for further studies.
9. A format involving plain enumeration of findings,
conclusions and recommendations may or may not
depending on the format prescribed.
✔
Bibliography/
Literature Cited
Citations