The document discusses morphological analysis and different types of morphemes. It notes that the word "ACTORS" contains three morphemes: "act", "-or", and "-s". "-s" is a grammatical morpheme that marks plural number, while "act" and "-or" are lexical morphemes. Grammatical morphemes do not change a word's category, but lexical morphemes can, such as "-ful" changing a noun to an adjective. Grammatical morphemes are also usually bound to words, unlike some lexical morphemes.
The document discusses morphological analysis and different types of morphemes. It notes that the word "ACTORS" contains three morphemes: "act", "-or", and "-s". "-s" is a grammatical morpheme that marks plural number, while "act" and "-or" are lexical morphemes. Grammatical morphemes do not change a word's category, but lexical morphemes can, such as "-ful" changing a noun to an adjective. Grammatical morphemes are also usually bound to words, unlike some lexical morphemes.
The document discusses morphological analysis and different types of morphemes. It notes that the word "ACTORS" contains three morphemes: "act", "-or", and "-s". "-s" is a grammatical morpheme that marks plural number, while "act" and "-or" are lexical morphemes. Grammatical morphemes do not change a word's category, but lexical morphemes can, such as "-ful" changing a noun to an adjective. Grammatical morphemes are also usually bound to words, unlike some lexical morphemes.
Lexicon and grammar • The word ACTORS can be analyzed into three morphemes: act, -or, -s • These morphemes don’t have the same status and they don’t do the same kind of job • ACTORS can be analyzed as a grammatical word form of the lexeme ACTOR. –s reflects the category of NUMBER and signals for the plural. • ACTOR is itself related to the lexeme ACT; adding –or converts the verb into a noun meaning “performed of the action mentioned” Lexical and grammatical morphemes • Grammatical morphemes never change the category of the word they are attached to. They are markers of grammatical forms of some given lexeme. For example, -ed in talked. • Lexical morphemes may change the category of the word, like –ful in spiteful as it changes a noun into an adjective. Sometimes, lexical morphemes don’t change the category, such as in warmish as adding –ish doesn’t change the adjective into another category. • Another difference is that grammatical morphemes are in the most part bound. Lexical morphemes may either be bound or free. Lexical and grammatical morphemes • Removing the grammatical morpheme doesn’t affect the lexical meaning of the word. Removing the –s in actors gives a different form, actor, of the lexeme ACT. • Can you identify the grammatical morphemes in the following words: Detective straightest threaded horsebox servant speeding
When a word contains both lexical and grammatical morphemes, their
order is fixed. Grammatical morphemes follow any lexical morphemes, we have act-or-s and nothing like act-s-or. Bound lexical morphemes • Many of the morphemes you can identify by analysis are not independent and are related in particular ways to the rest of the word that they make up. That’s obvious for the grammatical morphemes that we’ve met. • Let’s now examine some lexemes which, for various reasons, are harder to segment and interpret convincingly than most of those that we’ve seen so far Linguist utilize arrogant alacrity biology terrify location mechanic democrat meditate Bound lexical morphemes • In the second place of each of these words we find a bound derivational morpheme of the kind which signals membership of a particular lexical category. In the first place they have a bound lexical morpheme with a readily identifiable meaning. • For example, LINGUIST contains the morpheme –IST in the second place which forms nouns of the type X-IST meaning “person engaged in a trade or profession involving X”. We are left with a bit vague morpheme. RECEPTION-IST and HERBAL-IST have a clear and recognizable word in the first place. It isn’t as clear with LINGUIST. LINGU obviously has something to do with (BI-)LINGUAL and LANGUAGE. BOUND LEXICAL MORPHEMES • We can similarly recognize –ANT and –ITY as bound morphemes which are frequent adjective and noun forming elements as in REPENTANT and SOLIDITY, built on REPENT and SOLID. But what are ARROG- and ALACR-. • All the other examples show the same pattern, one clear morpheme and a bit left over. These bits of left overs are BOUND LEXICAL MORPHEMES, because they can’t occur free and they always have other morphemes attached. Exercise Identify the bound lexical morphemes in initial position in the following data. Can you confidently say what they mean? Histogram bovine (compare equine, ovine, canine, feline) Leucocyte Medical Android Geriatric Regulate Horrify theocracy Solution • HISTO-‘tissue’ in HISTOGRAM • BOV- ‘cattle’ in BOVINE • MEDIC- ‘to do with the healing arts’ in MEDICAL • GER-‘old person’ in GERIATRIC • HORR- ‘to do with fear and loathing’ in HORRIFY • LEUCO- ‘white’ in LEUCOCYTE • ANDR- ‘man’ in ANDROID • REGUL- ‘rule’ in REGULATE • THEO-‘god’ in THEOCRACY Grammatical and lexical morphemes • Grammatical: • Lexical: • They DO NOT change the • May change the category category of the word they of the word they are are attached to. For attached to. For example: example: box(es), wonder(ful), warm(ish), walk(ing), long(er) king(dom) • There are two types of • There are two types of grammatical morphemes: lexical morphemes: bound bound (inflectional) and (derivational) and free free (functional) (open-class words)