Trial 2:

• The usage of a bicycle dynamo as a generator presented numerous difficulties during the second attempt.

• The numerous difficulties are the bicycle dynamo was heavy.

Trial 3:
• The third trial which we used the DC generator instead of a bicycle dynamo.
Conclusion:
• A reaction turbine is the smart choice for hydroelectric power generation since it has the potential to
increase the kinetic energy and produce more energy.

• The kinetic energy equation and Bernoulli’s equation, especially the modified form, must be used
precisely in order to optimize the system.

• The DC generator’s use of a graphene covering offers a rare chance to increase its toughness and protect
its weaker components.

• The materials selected for turbine parts must be resistant to corrosion and minimize energy losses. The
two parameters that make up our test strategy are the volume flow rate and the electrical potential
difference output, with measurements heavily reliant on the equation of continuity for incompressible
fluids.
• Together, these ideas and elements are essential for creating hydroelectric power generation
systems that are both efficient and productive.

• The approach is crucial for achieving a sustainable future because it holds the promise of easing
the transition to energy independence from fossil.