EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY

Chapter 2: Research Ethics

 Research Ethics
 The American Psychological
Association Guidelines
 Protecting the Welfare of Animal
Subjects
 Fraud in Science
 Plagiarism
 Ethical Reports
Evolution of Ethics in Research
Research with human
participants is a privilege,
not a right… While there are
currently many different
guidelines governing
research with human
participants, all share the
same fundamental principles
of research ethics. Each
demands from the
researcher respect for
persons, beneficence, and
justice.
Research Ethics
Research ethics are a framework of values within
which we conduct research.

Ethics help researchers identify actions we consider

good and bad, and explain the principles by which
we make responsible decisions in actual situations.

Institutional review boards (IRBs), which

are composed of laypeople and researchers,
evaluate research proposals to make sure
that they follow ethical standards.
Research Ethics
Three (3) Principles of Research

Respect for
Beneficence Justice
Persons
• every person • obligation to • fairness in
is a person minimize risk both the
with the right of harm and burdens and
to make their maximize benefits of
own possible research
decisions benefits
Research must consider safety and welfare of all animal and
human subjects.
APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and
Code of Conduct Including 2010 Amendments
Standard 3.04: Avoiding Harm
Psychologists take reasonable steps to avoid harming their clients/patients, students,
supervisees, research participants, organizational clients and others with whom they
work, and to minimize harm where it is foreseeable and unavoidable.

Standard 3.08: Exploitative Relationships

Psychologists do not exploit persons over whom they have supervisory, evaluative
or other authority such as clients/patients, students, supervisees, research
participants and employees. (See also Standards 3.05, Multiple Relationships; 
6.04, Fees and Financial Arrangements; 6.05, Barter with Clients/Patients; 
7.07, Sexual Relationships with Students and Supervisees; 
10.05, Sexual Intimacies with Current Therapy Clients/Patients; 
10.06, Sexual Intimacies with Relatives or Significant Others of Current Therapy C
lients/Patients
; 10.07, Therapy with Former Sexual Partners; and
10.08, Sexual Intimacies with Former Therapy Clients/Patients.)
APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and
Code of Conduct Including 2010 Amendments
Standard 3.10: Informed Consent
(a) When psychologists conduct research or provide assessment, therapy,
counseling or consulting services in person or via electronic transmission or other
forms of communication, they obtain the informed consent of the individual or
individuals using language that is reasonably understandable to that person or
persons except when conducting such activities without consent is mandated by
law or governmental regulation or as otherwise provided in this Ethics Code. (See
also Standards 8.02, Informed Consent to Research; 
9.03, Informed Consent in Assessments; and 10.01, Informed Consent to Therapy.)
(b) For persons who are legally incapable of giving informed consent,
psychologists nevertheless (1) provide an appropriate explanation, (2) seek the
individual's assent, (3) consider such persons' preferences and best interests, and
(4) obtain appropriate permission from a legally authorized person, if such
substitute consent is permitted or required by law. When consent by a legally
authorized person is not permitted or required by law, psychologists take
reasonable steps to protect the individual's rights and welfare.
APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and
Code of Conduct Including 2010 Amendments
Standard 3.10: Informed Consent
(c) When psychological services are court ordered or otherwise mandated,
psychologists inform the individual of the nature of the anticipated services,
including whether the services are court ordered or mandated and any limits of
confidentiality, before proceeding.
(d) Psychologists appropriately document written or oral consent, permission,
and assent. (See also Standards 8.02, Informed Consent to Research; 
9.03, Informed Consent in Assessments; and 10.01, Informed Consent to Therapy.)
Protecting the Welfare of Animal Subjects

Animal welfare: humane

care of animals

Institutional Animal Care

and Use
Committee( IACUC): IRB
for animals

Animal rights: all sensate

species (those who feel
pain) have equal rights
APA Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care
and Use of Nonhuman Animals in Research
I. Justification of the Research
1. Research should be undertaken with a clear scientific purpose. There should be
a reasonable expectation that the research will:
a. Increase knowledge of the process underlying the evolution,
development, maintenance, alteration, control, or biological significance
of behavior.
b. Determine the replicability and generality of prior research.
c. Increase understanding of the species under study.
d. Provide results that benefit the health or welfare of humans or other
animals. 

2. The scientific purpose of the research should be of sufficient potential

significance to justify the use of nonhuman animals. In general, psychologists
should act on the assumption that procedures that are likely to produce pain in
humans may also do so in other animals, unless there is a species-specific
evidence of pain or stress to the contrary.
APA Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care
and Use of Nonhuman Animals in Research
I. Justification of the Research
3. In proposing a research project, the psychologist should be familiar with the
appropriate literature, consider the possibility of non-animal alternatives, and use
procedures that minimize the number of nonhuman animals in research. If
nonhuman animals are to be used, the species chosen for the study should be the
best suited to answer the question(s) posed. 

4. Research on nonhuman animals may not be conducted until the protocol has
been reviewed by an appropriate animal care committee; typically, an Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), to ensure that the procedures are
appropriate and humane. 

5. The psychologist(s) should monitor the research and the subjects’ welfare
throughout the course of an investigation to ensure continued justification for the
research.
Fraud in Science
What is scientific Fraud?
Scientific fraud involves falsifying or fabricating data.

A researcher’s graduation, tenure, promotion, funding, or

reputation may motivate researchers to commit fraud.

Defense against fraud

The peer review process filters submitted manuscripts so that
only 15-20% of articles are printed.

Replication, where researchers attempt to reproduce the

findings of others, is the second line of defense.

Competition by colleagues for scarce resources, while a cause

of fraud, is the third line of defense.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is misrepresenting someone’s “ideas, words, or
written work” as your own.

Plagiarism is a form of fraud, in which an individual claims

false credit for another’s ideas, words, or written work.
Ethical Reports
Authorship credit should only be given to those who made
a major contribution to the research or writing.
Researchers should not take credit for the same research
more than once.

The ethical solution is to cite original publications when

republishing data in a journal article or republishing journal
articles in an edited volume.
 END
THANK YOU