THE DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN THE EDTA

AND HEPARIN
ANTICOAGULANT
EXAMINTAIONS ON
THE HEMATOCRIT
VALUE
 01 INTRODUCTION 03 RESULTS/FINDINGS
TABLE OF
CONTENT 02 RESEARCH METHOD 04 CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION
HEMATOLOGICAL EXAMINATION
Hematological examination involves various tests, including special blood
examination, routine blood examination, and complete blood count (CBC).
Special blood examination assesses peripheral blood, red blood cells,
reticulocytes, and platelets. Routine blood examination measures
hemoglobin, white blood cells, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. CBC is
a fundamental test that provides an overall assessment of blood
components.
 RESEARCH METHOD
The procedure for taking venous blood samples using EDTA and Heparin anticoagulants was carried out using a random
sampling technique

01 02 03 04

RESPONDENTS ANTICOAGULANT MICRO CAPILLARY TUBE HCT SCALE READER

The respondent sits with arms The vein is punctured with a Some of the blood is also put The micro capillary tube was
straight at heart level. The arm syringe, blood is drawn with a into the micro capillary tube then inserted into the micro
to be pierced is cleaned with syringe and poured into a vial hematocrit centrifuge, swirled
70% alcohol and dammed containing an anticoagulant for 5 minutes, the hematocrit
value was read using an HCT
scale reader.
 RESULTS/FINDINGS

44% AVERAGE EDTA VS HEPARIN GENDER

no significant difference between the average hematocrit using 10% Gender differences also affect
the two anticoagulants, with an EDTA was 44.25%, whereas with hematocrit values, with women
average hematocrit value of 10% Heparin it was 43.15% having slightly lower values
around 44%.
CONCLUSION
the hematocrit values obtained (44%) were still within the normal range. Therefore, it can be
concluded that there is no difference in the results of the hematocrit examination using the
anticoagulants EDTA and Heparin with a concentration of 10% in venous blood samples
using the micro method.
THANK
YOU