Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capital
• Land
• Building
• Machinery
Inputs
• Raw materials
• Infrastructure
Let us consider Caroline’s Cookie Factory
• Explicit costs (opportunity costs require the firm to pay out some money)
1. When Caroline pays $1,000 for flour, that $1,000 is an opportunity cost because
Caroline can no longer use that $1,000 to buy something else.
2. Similarly, when Caroline hires workers to make the cookies, the wages she pays are
part of the firm’s costs.
• Implicit costs (opportunity costs that do not require a cash outlay)
1. Imagine that Caroline is skilled with computers and could earn $100 per hour
working as a programmer. For every hour that Caroline works at her cookie factory,
she gives up $100 in income, and this forgone income is also part of her costs.
• The total cost of Caroline’s business is the sum of her explicit and implicit costs
The Cost of Capital as an Opportunity
Cost
• Caroline used $300,000 of her savings to buy her cookie factory from its
previous owner.
• If Caroline had instead left this money deposited in a savings account
that pays an interest rate of 5 percent, she would have earned $15,000
per year.
• Implicit opportunity costs: forgone $15,000
• An economist consider the $15,000 in interest income as an implicit
cost of her business.
• An accountant donot consider $15,000 as a cost because no money
flows out of the business to pay for it.
Calculate the cost by the economist and the
accountant
• Suppose now that Caroline did not have the entire $300,000 to buy
the factory. Instead, used $100,000 of her own savings and borrowed
$200,000 from a bank at an interest rate of 5 percent.
Solution
• Accountant: Will consider $10,000 interest paid on the bank loan
every year as a cost because this amount of money now flows out of
the firm.
• Economist: The opportunity cost equals the interest on the bank loan
(an explicit cost of $10,000) plus the forgone interest on savings (an
implicit cost of $5,000).
What is the difference between economic profit and accounting profit?
• Production function: Function showing the highest output that a firm can produce
for every specified combination of inputs.
q = F(K,L)
Three features
(1)Marginal cost rises with the
quantity of output.
(2)The average-total-cost curve
is U-shaped.
(3) the marginal-cost curve
crosses the average-total-cost
curve at the minimum of
average total cost.
Explanations
(1)Marginal cost rises with the quantity of output: property of diminishing
marginal product
(2)The average-total-cost curve is U-shaped: because of the behavior of the
fixed cost and variable cost
(3) The marginal-cost curve crosses the average-total-cost curve at the
minimum of average total cost: Consider this analogy; Average total cost is
like your cumulative grade point average. Marginal cost is like the grade you
get in the next course you take. If your grade in your next course is less than
your grade point average, your grade point average will fall. If your grade in
your next course is higher than your grade point average, your grade point
average will rise.
Marginal and average cost curve
• Marginal cost curve: Marginal cost curve
decreases with increase in output.
• It is the slope of VC. 100 Cost (rupees
per unit) MC
• Average cost curve:
75
• AVC decreases till, MC < AVC. ATC
25
• Average variable cost curve is minimum
when MC = AVC AFC
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Output (units per year)
The marginal-cost curve crosses the average-
total-cost curve at its minimum. Why?
• At low levels of output, marginal cost is below average total cost, so
average total cost is falling.
• But after the two curves cross, marginal cost rises above average total
cost.
• For the reason we have just discussed, average total cost must start to
rise at this level of output.
Cost Curves for a Typical Firm
• Many firms experience
increasing marginal product
before diminishing marginal
product.
• Notice that marginal cost and
average variable cost fall for a
while before starting to rise.
Cost (rupees
per year)
TC
Cost curves
400
VC
300
minimum. AFC
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Output (units per year)
The Many Types of Cost: A Summary
Mention the time period required by Tata
Motors to
• Build a factory? Or close an existing one?
• Hire labourers?
• Install a machine?
Costs in the Short run and in the Long run
• The figure presents three short-run average-total-cost curves—for a small,
medium, and large factory.
• It also presents the long-run average-total-cost curve.
• As the firm moves along the long-run curve, it is adjusting the size of the
factory to the quantity of production.
• Long-run average-total-cost curve is a much flatter U-shape than the short-
run average total-cost curve.
• All the short-run curves lie on or above the long-run curve, because firms
have greater flexibility in the long run.
• In the long run, the firm gets to choose which short-run curve it wants to
use. But in the short run, it has to use whatever short-run curve it has,
based on decisions it has made in the past.
How a change in production alters costs
over different time horizons
• When Ford wants to increase production from 1,000 to 1,200 cars per
day, it has no choice in the short run but to hire more workers at its
existing medium-sized factory.
• total cost Because of diminishing marginal product, average rises from
$10,000 to $12,000 per car.
• In the long run, however, Ford can expand both the size of the factory
and its workforce, and average total cost returns to $10,000.
Average Total Cost in the Short and long
Runs
Because fixed costs are
variable in the long run,
the average-total-cost
curve in the short run
differs from the average-
total-cost curve in the long
run.
How long does it take a firm to get to the
long run?
• The answer depends on the firm.
• It can take a year or more for a major manufacturing firm, such as a
car company, to build a larger factory.
• By contrast, a person running a coffee shop can buy another coffee
maker within a few days.
• No single answer to the question of how long it takes a firm to
adjust its production facilities.
Cost in the short run
• Marginal cost :
• Change in Variable cost = wage per unit of labour X change in labour to produce extra
output.
• MC = ∆VC/ ∆q = w ∆L/ ∆q
• MC = w/ MPL
• If marginal product of labour is low, then marginal cost would be
higher.
• Diminishing Marginal returns and costs: When diminishing marginal
productivity of labour sets in then the marginal cost would increase
with increase in output.
Economies and Diseconomies of Scale
• The shape of the long-run average-total-cost curve tells us how costs vary with
the scale—that is, the size—of a firm’s operations.
• When long-run average total cost declines as output increases, economies of
scale occurs.
• When long-run average total cost rises as output increases, there are said to be
diseconomies of scale.
• When long-run average total cost does not vary with the level of output,
constant returns to scale occurs.
• It is measured in terms of a cost-output elasticity.
• Ec = (∆C/C)/(∆q/q)
• Ec = (∆C/∆q)/(C/q) = MC/AC
What might cause economies or
diseconomies of scale?
• Economies of scale arise because higher production levels allow
specialization among workers.
• Diseconomies of scale can arise because of coordination problems
that are inherent in any large organization.
• Explains the U-shape of long-run average-total-cost curves.
• At low levels of production, the firm benefits from increased size
because it can take advantage of greater specialization.
• At high levels of production, coordination problems become more
severe.
Long-run average cost
• In the long-run, the ability of a firm to change the inputs allows
the firm to reduce costs.
• Depends on returns to scale
• Constant returns to scale:
• the long run average cost is constant at all level of outputs.
• Decreasing returns to scale:
• the long run average cost increases with increase in output.
• Increasing returns to scale:
• the long run average cost decreases with increase in output.
Returns to scale
• The rate at which output increases as inputs are increased
proportionately.
Capital
• Increasing returns to scale: Output more (machine hours)
1 30
10 20
0
1 2 3
Labour (hours)
Returns to scale
• Constant returns to scale: Situation in which • Decreasing returns to scale: Output less
output doubles when all inputs are doubled. than doubles when all inputs are
doubled.
• Size of the firm does not affect the productivity of
its factors. • This phenomena is observed in due to
coordination problems.
Capital Capital
(machine hours) (machine hours)
3 3
2 2 30
1 30 1
20 10 20
10 0
0
1 2 3 1 2 3
Labour (hours)
Labour (hours)
Economies of scope
• Firms produce more than one output.
• Products may be related or unrelated.
• Diseconomies of scope: Situation in which joint output of a single firm is less than
could be achieved by separate firms when each produces a single product.
Output
Output per
C Total product
curve
10
• Stage 2: The stage from average product at its maximum till marginal product
reaches zero. Average product decreases but is still positive.
A
• In long run or with technological inventions, Total product
total output can shift up along with marginal 60
curves
product curve.
• Output is increasing from ‘A’ to ‘B’ to ‘C’ with
increase in labour. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Labour per
month
Production with two variables-long run
• Isoquants: Curve showing all possible combinations of inputs that yield the same
output.
• Marginal rate of technical substitution between two inputs is equal to the ratio
of the marginal products of the inputs.
• Production functions:
12
• Perfect substitutes: MRTS is constant. 10
4
2
q1 q2 q3
0
1 2 3 4 5
perfect complements. 7
3
• L-shaped Isoquants
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
• Brown line shows technically efficient combination of inputs. Labour per year
• Vertical and horizontal segments have either marginal product of capital
or marginal product of labour as zero.
Isocost
• All possible combinations of labour and capital that can be purchased for a given
total cost.
• C = wL + rK Capital per year
K2 B
Capital per
• Expansion path shows the lowest cost 150 hour
combination of labour and capital to produce Expansion Long-run Total
path cost
output in the long run.
100
• By varying both inputs to production.
50
C 300 unit
B
• The output cost combination of the expansion A
200 unit
100 unit
path gives the long-run total cost curve. 0
100 200 300
Labour per
hour
Long-run versus Short-run cost curves
• Inflexibility of short-run production: In short run,
factors of production are not flexible.
Capital per
hour
Long-run
Expansion
• Q1 is produced by using L1 units of labour and K1 path
units of capital.
C Short-run
• Q2 would be produced by using fixed capital K1 K2 Expansion path
and L3 units of labour. B D q2
K1
• This is at a higher Isocost curve IC3. A IC2 IC3 q1
IC1
0
L1 L2 L3
Labour per
• With higher capital K2, Q2 can be produced at a hour
lower Isocost curve IC2.