DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

GRADUATION THESIS COURSE 2018 - 2022

DESIGN OF GENERAL
HOAN MY HOSPITAL

Student : Duong Minh Khoi

ID : 1852480
Structural Instructor:
PhD. Nguyen Hong An
Construction Instructor:
PhD. Tran Duc Hoc
CONTENT
• ARCHITECTURAL
OVERVIEW
• STRUCTURAL DESIGN
• CONSTRUCTION METHOD
• REFERENCE

2
1. ARCHITECTURAL OVERVIEW

3
GENERAL

• The World Health Organization

(WHO) has warned that the number
of people infected with the SARS-
COVID-19 epidemic is on the rise.
This has caused international
investors and the government to be
concerned about the need to build
high-quality health facilities to
serve the residents.

The reason why student choose the HOAN MY General Hospital

to design for Graduation Thesis.
4
 LOCATION

• 291 Nguyen Van Linh, Thanh Khue

District, Da Nang City.
• Convenient position for accessing
and leaving the hospital, adjacent to
the major road.

5
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN VIEW OF HOAN MY HOSPITAL

7
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN VIEW OF HOAN MY HOSPITAL

THE SECOND BASEMENT PLAN VIEW

7
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN VIEW OF HOAN MY HOSPITAL

THE ELEVATION VIEW 8

2. STRUCTURAL DESIGN

9
THESIS OBJECTIVES

• Design of typical slab of the first floor

• Design of typical frame (beams, columns,
shear walls) of grid 3
• Design of Foundation

10
STRUCTURAL SOLUTION

• In general, the slab appropriate to any

given set of conditions should be
adequate in terms of performance and
economy.
• Each slab has its own perks, but student
would lean towards the benefits that
conventional slab brings to a project.
Conventional slab is simple to construct
and minimize the floor height due to
beam's height and keep it safety for the
usage. Two – way slab

11
STRUCTURAL SOLUTION

• In general, based on criteria above “Shear walls – Frame and Beams – Slabs system” will
be selected for analysis and design of HOAN MY Hospital.

12
SLAB DESIGN Design Standard: BS EN 1992-1-1: 2004
• Identify the preliminary for each of the four structural components: the slabs, beams,
columns and shear walls. Identify the internal force by many structural design software
(ETABS, SAP2000, SAFE, etc.) to compute the reinforcement and combo SLS is used
for cracking and deflection controls.

Reinforcement using in slab

12a200, 12a150 and 12a100
13
DYNAMICS ANALYSIS
WIND LOAD Design Standard: BS EN 1991-1-4: 2005

Wind force according to X-direction Wind force according to Y-direction

14
 DYNAMICS ANALYSIS
WIND LOAD Design Standard: BS EN 1991-1-4: 2005

Story 1 Story 1

Story 2 Story 2

Story 3 Story 3

Story 4 Story 4

Story 5 Story 5

Story 6 Story 6

Story 7 Story 7

Story 8 Story 8

Story 9 Story 9
Story

Story
Story 10 Story 10

Story 11 Story 11

Story 12 Story 12

Story 13 Story 13

Story 14 Story 14

Story 15 Story 15

Story 16 Story 16

Story 17 Story 17

Story 18 Story 18
0 50 100 150 200 250 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Wind Forces (kN)

Wind Force by ETABS Wind Force by manual
Wind Forces (kN)
Wind Force by ETABS Wind Force by manual

15
 DYNAMICS ANALYSIS
SEISMIC LOAD Design Standard: BS EN 1998-1:2004

Modal Response Spectrum Analysis Method Modal Case

Ground Type: D 1 2 3 4 5 6
Importance factor 1 = 1.4 UX RZ UY UX RZ RZ
7 8 9 10 11 12
Reference peak ground acceleration /g = 0.0967
UY UX RZ RZ UX UY
Peak ground acceleration ag = 0.0967g 13 14 15
Behavior factor q = 3.9 RZ UX RZ
Amount of modes taken into design k = 15

16
DESIGN OF BEAMS ALONG AXIS Design
3 Standard: BS EN 1992-1-1: 2004
Design for tensile reinforcement. (ULS)

17
DESIGN OF BEAMS ALONG AXIS 3
Shear resistance checking for member not requiring design (6.2.2 EN 1992)

Shear resistance for member requiring shear design (6.2.3 EN 1992)

18
DESIGN OF BEAMS ALONG AXIS 3
Design for serviceability limit state (SLS)
Deflection control span effective method (7.4.2 EN 1992)

• The final deflection of a beam, slab or cantilever should not exceed span/ 250
• That part of the deflection which takes placed in finishes or fixing partition should not exceed /500
19
DESIGN OF BEAMS ALONG AXIS 3
Design for serviceability limit state (SLS)
Deflection control span effective method (7.4.2 EN 1992)

• The final deflection of a beam, slab or cantilever should not exceed span/ 250
• That part of the deflection which takes placed in finishes or fixing partition should not exceed /500
20
DESIGN OF BEAMS ALONG AXIS 3
Cracking control: Limiting crack width method (7.3.4 EN 1992)

21
DESIGN OF BEAMS ALONG AXIS 3
Cracking control: Limiting crack width method (7.3.4 EN 1992)

22
DESIGN OF COLUMN ALONG AXIS 3
CLASSIFICATION OF COLUMN

23
DESIGN OF COLUMN ALONG AXIS 3
LONGITUDINAL REBAR

24
DESIGN OF COLUMN ALONG AXIS 3
Note:

25
DESIGN OF SHEAR WALLS ALONG AXIS 3

26
3. FOUNDATION DESIGN

27
DESIGN OF FOUNDATION

Bored foundation layout

28
 DESIGN OF FOUNDATION
Step 1: Calculate single pile resistance
• Pile resistance from pile material
• Soil parameter
• SPT result
Load capacity of bored pile

Step 2: Foundation check

• Single pile reaction check
• Group pile verification
• Foundation settlement (Elastic settlement, Consolidate settlement)
29
DESIGN OF FOUNDATION

Step 3: Pile cap design

• Model pile cap in SAFE to take the internal forces
• Flexural resistance
• Critical shear resistance
• Punching shear resistance
• Shear perimeter

Step 4: Checking Horizontal displacement and rotation angle of pile head

• Lateral displacement (modeling in SAP2000)
• Checking the stability of surrounding soil
• Verification of resistance strength of pile

30
4. CONSTRUCTION METHOD

31
CONSTRUCTION SITE LAYOUT

32
 BEAM SLAB
Material properties

Applied standard

33
BEAM SLAB

RING LOCK SCAFFOLDING

•Versatility: Different frame sizes, shape

•High efficiency: Simple, fast assembling and
dismantling
•Large bearing capacity
•Safety and reliability:  Two-way self-locking
ability
BEAM-SLAB PLAN LAYOUT

34
 COLUMN
Material properties

Applied standard

35
 SHEAR WALL
Material properties

Applied standard

36
REFERENCES

37
 Click icon to add picture

THE END
THANKS FOR WATCHING

38