Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BE Case Study CHPT 4
BE Case Study CHPT 4
Corporate Governance
Chapter 4: Code of Ethics for the
Accountancy Profession
Malaysian
Whistle-blower
The Companies Institute of
Protection Act
Act 2016: Accountants
2010
(MIA) By-laws
Fraud & White-collar Crime
Financial
Reputational
Market Losses
Integrity
Damage
Fraud & White-collar Crime: Role in Combat Fraud
Identify
Red
Flags:
Eff Impl
d uct ecti em
n c
Co rensi ons v e
Co e Int nt
Fo tigati ntr ern
ols a l
nv es
I
Accountancy Profession: Acts & Policies
Malaysian Anti-
Securities
The Companies Corruption
Commission Act
Act 2016 Commission Act
1993
2009:
Dealing with Conflict of Interest
Professional Governance
Disclosure &
Codes & & Regulatory
Transparency
Guidelines Frameworks
Dealing with Conflict of Interest: Acts
Capital Markets and Services • Section 176: empowers the SC to establish rules
Act 2007 (CMSA): and guidelines for market intermediaries.
Professional
Integrity and
Competence and
Ethical Conduct
Due Care
Confidentiality
Independence
and Data
and Objectivity
Protection
Ethical Decision-
Compliance with
Making and
Laws and
Professional
Regulations
Judgment
Sources of Ethical Guidance for Professional Accountants
IFAC Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
Effective Implementation of the Code of Conduct
Reporting Mechanisms
Effective Implementation of the Code of Conduct: Benefits of
Effective Implementation
XYZ Sdn Bhd is a well-established manufacturing company that has been experiencing declining profits and cash
flow problems. As their external accountant, you have been working closely with the company's management
team to address these issues. However, you have recently discovered some alarming information:
You notice that the company's CEO, who is also a major shareholder, is pressuring you to manipulate the
financial statements to present a more favorable picture of the company's financial health. The CEO insists that
this is necessary to secure additional funding from investors. However, you are concerned about the ethical
implications of misrepresenting the company's financial position.
During your analysis, you uncover evidence suggesting fraudulent activities within the company. Specifically,
you suspect that the CEO and other senior executives may be involved in embezzlement, inflating revenues, and
understating expenses. These activities are aimed at artificially boosting the company's financial performance and
deceiving stakeholders.
You realize that your firm also provides consultancy services to the same manufacturing industry and has
several other clients who may be potential competitors or business partners of XYZ Sdn Bhd. This creates a
conflict of interest as your firm may have access to sensitive information that could compromise the
confidentiality and integrity of the client's data.
As a professional accountant, you are aware of the public's expectations regarding your ethical conduct,
integrity, and responsibility to uphold the profession's standards. The public places trust in your expertise and
expects you to act in the best interest of your clients, shareholders, and society at large.
Case Study Scenario: Questions
1. How would you apply the concept of blind loyalty while considering your professional
obligations and ethical responsibilities?
2. What steps would you take to address the suspected fraudulent activities within XYZ
Sdn Bhd? How would you balance your duty to report these activities and maintain
client confidentiality?
3. How would you manage the conflict of interest arising from your firm's involvement
with other clients in the same industry? What actions would you take to ensure the
integrity and independence of your work with XYZ Sdn Bhd?
4. Considering the public expectations of professional accountants, how would you
ensure transparency, integrity, and accountability in your handling of this ethical
dilemma? How would you communicate and engage stakeholders to maintain their
trust and confidence?
End