Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 2
What are concepts and why do they
matter?
28/2/23
Dr Janosch Prinz
What are concepts (not)? Theories
• Concepts are not the same as terms/words
• Theories of concepts have developed in the West over the past 2500 years.
They typically contain some version of the following claims:
• Plato’s Theory of Forms (in The Republic) - concepts as essences in their own
world, of which we have only a hazy recollection
What are concepts (not)? Theories II
Ludwig Wittgenstein’s early “picture theory” of concepts
• Developed in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921)
• concepts are…
• pictures of the world
• but they are only true if we can verify their correspondence to the world
• Otherwise, these concepts are mystical – we should not waste our time studying them
What are concepts (not)? Theories III
•Concepts are….
•not eternal essences in their own world (Plato)
•not verifiable pictures of the world (early Wittgenstein)
•not just about defining terms, but about giving practical orientation
• Our insight follows Wittgenstein’s later approach in his Philosophical Investigations (1953)
Questions?
Why do we study concepts?
• Not just to name things but for practical purposes, to know what to do/say
• In Arts and Culture, we mostly study concepts, the meaning of which is not settled
• E.g. we have millions of pages of scholarship on “democracy”, and far fewer on the
concept of “table”
Why do we study concepts? What do concepts do for us?
One could – in a simplified way – distinguish three dimensions of the
value of concepts:
Activity: Talk with your neighbor about how to apply these three
dimensions to concepts? Draw on your knowledge from Apollo and
Dionysus of these three dimensions.
What do concepts do for us?
One could – in a simplified way – distinguish three dimensions of the value of concepts:
• The ontological dimension: a guide to/definition of what exists
• The epistemological dimension: a (neutral) tool for how to acquire knowledge
• The ethical/moral/political dimension: a tool for deciding how should I/we live (well)?
How can we make sense of such disagreements about the meaning of concepts?
Analysing Concepts
• Our course is called ‘Doing Conceptual Analysis, so now that we have talked about concepts, what
does analysis refer to?
• But there is some agreement that analysis has to with rigorous investigation which provides
additional insights. These insights can be won by e.g. making visible distinctive elements of a concept,
showing connections, applying a set of investigate steps (a method or approach), applying logical
argumentation
• As Arts and Culture is an interdisciplinary Bachelor programme, we seek to provide you with tools for
descriptive analysis as well as normative analysis (I will return to them later)
• No matter which meaning of, or approach to, analysis we take, we assume a theory or theories of
concepts in our analysis
Concepts and Conceptions
• Often we do not analyze a concept in a universal way, but rather we zoom in on rivaling
understandings of the same concepts in a particular society or period
• In other words, there is some (limited) agreement about the boundaries of a concept but
disagreement about which understanding of it is the ‘best’ (for a particular context, for particular
purposes etc.)
• Between the proponents of conceptions, there is some shared ambition to affect the use of socially
meaningful concepts (rather than an essential core of a concept shared by all conceptions)
• Conflicts over the meaning of conceptions/concepts look not like impartial scholarly discussions but rather
like political disputes
• Gallie offered a list of seven features that make concepts essentially contested
• (I) their evaluative character,
• (II) internal complexity,
• (III) diverse describability,
• (IV) openness to new interpretations,
• (V) reciprocal recognition of their disputed character among contending parties,
• (VI) an original exemplar of the concept in question that anchors conceptual meaning,
• (VII) continuous competition over who is the “true inheritor to the original exemplar and is developing it in
the best way” (Gaus, 2000, p. 31)
Social Justice as an Essentially Contested Concept
Socialist social justice Liberal social justice
2) Normative approaches
•trace what a certain concept should mean in view of the demands of rationality and our commitments
•intervene in struggles over meaning, seek to affect concept use
•Examples: political philosophy or political discourse