Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kesehatan
Arih Diyaning Intiasari
Referensi
• Buse, May and Walt, 2005. Making Health Policy
• Nugroho, 2009. Public Policy
• Ayuningtyas,2014. Kebijakan Kesehatan. Prinsip dan Praktik.
Rajawali Pers
• O’Neill et al., 2016. Monitoring, evaluation and review of
national health policies, strategies and plans. WHO
Definisi
• Penaksiran (appraisal), Pemberian Angka (rating) dan Penilaian
(assesment)
• Evaluasi Kebijakan merupakan mekanisme pengawasan
terhadap kebijakan
• Produksi informasi valid dan terpercaya mengenai nilai
manfaat kebijakan
• Memberikan klarifikasi dan kritik terhadap nilai yang
mendasari pemilihan tujuan dan target kebijakan
• Untuk menilai efektifitas kebijakan terhadap konstituennya
• Untuk menilai gap antara “harapan” dan “kenyataan”
(Masalah)
Definition of Monitoring Evaluation and Review
• Monitoring means collecting, tracking and analysing data to
determine what is happening, where, and to whom. Monitoring uses
a set of core indicators and targets to provide timely and accurate
information in order to inform progress and performance reviews
and decision making processes. In the context of NHPSP, the
indicators and targets should be linked to the strategic directions
and key objectives for the health sector.
• Evaluation builds upon the monitoring data but the analysis goes
much deeper. Additional data are often needed to take into account
contextual changes and determine if change is attributable to
services.
• Reviews gather evidence through monitoring and evaluation
processes to assess progress and performance. Health sector
reviews require national institutional mechanisms involving multiple
stakeholders to provide the basis for mutual accountability. Reviews
should link assessment to country follow-up action including
prioritization, resource allocation and policy dialogue. Several
characteristics are recommended to ensure a sound health sector
situation analysis
• Alasan pentingnya evaluasi :
1. Menghindari kebiasan buruk administrasi di Indonesia, yaitu
“ganti pejabat ganti peraturan”
2. Setiap kebijakan tidak dapat diganti karena keinginan atau
selera pejabat publik berwenang
Why are Monitoring, evaluation and review important?
(O’Neill et al., 2016)
• Because progress and performance of the national health
strategy need to be tracked
• Because country monitoring is the basis for regional and
global monitoring of priority health issues
• Because reporting progress on health related SDGs
requires sound M&E system
• Because health inequities need to be monitored
• Because country need functional surveilance mechanism
• Because M&E and review are the necessary basis for
accountability
• Because there is a growing interest and demand for
quality data for decision making and accountability
Monitoring dan Evaluasi (Buse, 2005)
• Monitoring adalah pengumpulan data rutin tentang aktivitas
kebijakan yang terkadang bertentangan dengan rencana dan
kontrak
• Evaluasi adalah penelitian yang secara khusus dirancang untuk
menilai kegiatan dan dampak program atau kebijakansehingga
bisa menentukan apakah kebijakan tersebut pantas untuk
dikembangkan lebih lanjut
Ciri Evaluasi Kesehatan
• Menemukan hal yang strategis mempengaruhi kinerja
kebijakan
• Evaluator mampu mengambil jarak dari pembuat kebijakan,
pelaksana kebijakan dan target kebijakan
• Prosedur dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara metodologis
• Tidak dilaksanakan dalam suasana permusuhan atau
kebencian
• Mencakup Rumusan, implementasi , kontekstual dan kinerja
kebijakan
Dimensi Kebijakan Publik sebagai
Fokus Evaluasi Kebijakan
Implementasi
Perumusan Kebijakan
Kebijakan
Evaluasi
Kebijakan
POLICY IMPLEMENTATION
Actors
Regulation & Procedures
Programmes and Project
External Factors
(other influencing factors &
policies, changing conditions)