You are on page 1of 46

Project Management

9. HSE MANAGEMENT

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management


Project management course content
1. Introduction
2. Project development studies (preliminary studies to pre-FEED)
3. Basic engineering or FEED
4. Project EPC contracting (strategy, contracts, bidding phase to effective
date)
5. EPC project organisation & execution plan
6. Project Control (Planning)
7. Project Control (Cost)
8. Procurement
9. HSE
10. Local Content

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 2
Project HSE management

 Scope:
• Identify Hazards; appraise and quantify Risks
• Establish HSE policy, procedures, objectives
• Initiate/Pursue Environment Protection tools use (EBS, EIA,
EMP)
• Implement HSE policy and risk management
• Initiate/Pursue Safety Case (Safety concept)
 Objectives:
• Ensure Safety and Security of all personnel, at all phases,
including future operation
• Respect and protect environment
• Protect assets

© 2012 - IFP Training


• Implement HSE Company policy, achieve goals

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 3


HSE main purposes

 To create safe and sound facilities, by design, during


construction, and future operation, through the life of the plant,
by:
• Identifying the hazards,
• Eliminating them, or reducing to minimum potential effect,
• Enabling effective control, avoiding unproven solutions (technology,
procedure...)
• Selecting and implementing governing References, Norms, Rules
and Standards, the relevant Company policies and objectives
 Main areas of application:
• Safety of personnel;
• Protection of the environment;
• Protection of assets and plant integrity;

© 2012 - IFP Training


• Preservation of company image.

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 4


Main terms & definitions
 HAZARD
• Existing potential of a compound (e.g. toxic H2S) or working practice
(working at elevated place) to cause damage/loss to persons and/or
environment (SEVESO II directive).
 RISK
• Potential accident due to a hazardous situation
• RISK level: probability of an accident, of its gravity (ISO/CEI 51)
• RISK value= Probability x Consequences [Severity or gravity]

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 5
Main terms & definitions

 Health: State of being free from illness or injury (common


dictionary), achieved through a combination of physical, mental
and social well-being (added by world health organisation)
 Safety: state of being “Safe” (common dictionary). Being
protected from events that cause losses (to persons or assets)
 Security: degree of protection against actions of people
attempting to cause destruction / criminal activity of any sort,
including terrorism
 Environment: surroundings of an object (common dictionary). The
totality of circumstances surrounding an organism, or group of
organisms (such as fauna & flora)

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 6
References and tools

RULES, STANDARDS, NORMS, etc.


• National Regulations (safety case, SEVESO…)
• International standards (API, NFPA, EN, BS, IMO, SOLAS…)
• Insurance Company rules
• Certification, Classification body rules
• TOOLS: STUDIES, REVIEWS,
Company specifications AUDITS…
• Safety studies: HAZID, HAZAN,
• Safety reviews: HAZOP, AUDITS
• PTR, SIMOPS
• Environment: EBS, EIA
• Risk: PRA, QRA

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 7
Design strategy, tools,target areas

Process control
PREVENT HAZID, HAZOP Process isolation
Decrease probability of release Overpressure protection
Safe design, Frequency analysis
Material selection

Layout & Zoning


Ventilation
CONTROL HAZAN (consequence) analysis, Insulation
Avoid accidental ignition of release Safety Distances Electrical isolation
ESD upon Gas detection
Dispersion
Drainage

Layout
Consequence analysis Fire detection
MITIGATE ESD & EDP
Escalation analysis
Mitigation of consequences Bunding & Drainage
Risk assessment Blast proofing
Active Fire protection
Passive fire protection

EVACUATE Escape, Evacuation, and Rescue Layout

© 2012 - IFP Training


Protection of evacuation
Provide for escape, evacuation, rescue study
routes & means
Alert
Emergency room

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 8


Safety Studies during project lifecycle

PRE PROJECT PROJECT PRODUCTION

DETAIL COMMIS - START


STUDIES SOR BASIC or FEED & CONSTRUCTION SIONNING UP
HAZID HAZID
HAZAN HAZAN
S.O.R P&ID DEROGATION
CHANGE REVIEW REQUESTS

HSE SAFETY
CASE / REPORT DOSSIER

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS HAZOP 1 HAZOP 2 HAZOP 3 POST START-UP


AUDIT
PTR 1 PTR 2 PTR 3 PTR 4 PTR 5

© 2012 - IFP Training


6 months
Feedback after S/U

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 9


Conceptual and Pre-Project Studies – Environment

Environment protection
 Environmental management of the project. Three essential tools:
• EBS (Environmental Baseline Survey): analysis of the initial status of the
site (reference status for further controls comparisons)
• EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment): detailed description of the
impacts of the projected activities on the site and mitigation measures for
reducing these impacts to a level as low as possible
• EMP (Environmental Management Plan): essential tool dedicated to the
Environment preservation during construction and operations, (including
Oil Spill Contingency Plan, Waste Management Plan, Chemicals
Management Plan, Biodiversity Management Plan, Monitoring, etc.)

 Other Environmental Risk Assessment and/or Modelling tools:


• DREAM: risk analysis for Operational Releases (water effluent, chemicals)

© 2012 - IFP Training


• Various 3-D Oil Spill Contingency and Response models
• Various atmospheric dispersion models

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 10


HAZID (Hazard Identification)
 Identification of hazards method:
• Use of Guide word and prompter list
• Requires the participation of “key personnel”
• “helicopter” view, zoom in as necessary, everyone is encouraged to
contribute his/her view
 Objectives:
• Review plant HAZARDS (e.g. blast), from the facilities to the
neighbouring environment
• Review External HAZARDS (natural, other industries, surrounding
conditions…) onto the facilities
• Review operational HAZARDS, for specific operations
 Done, and recorded
• Normally once, before end of pre-project for design HAZID

© 2012 - IFP Training


• Any time a specific design or operation warrants it!

Key attitudes: be open, thorough & rigorous


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 11
HAZID Process

 Before the HAZID: collect information on plant / operation to be


analysed, usually using design layouts / PIDs or a « method
statement » which breaks the operation into a sequence of steps
 Prepare the HAZID worksheet, based on the breakdown of the
plant into systems or the operation into steps
 During the HAZID: the chairman acts as a facilitator, prompting
participants to suggest guide words, filling in with his/her own
when necessary. For each guide word, a or several « causes » are
envisaged along with their potential consequences, and existing
controls; additional controls to be implemented are added.
 The final step is to agree a priority for the AOCs, using a PRA

© 2012 - IFP Training


 After the HAZID, a finalized worksheet & report are established

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 12


HAZID (Hazard Identification)

Comments on the previous slide


 HAZID WORKSHEET
CARINA-ARIES OFFSHORE HAZID #1 STUDY
Priority Categories: 1. Mandatory (Immediate action); 2. Recommended (Short Term action); 3. To be developed (Long Term action)

N° SYSTEM / UNIT / GUIDE WORD CAUSE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SAFEGUARDS / ACTIONS / PRIORITY
NODE LOCATION & CONSEQUENCES CONTROLS IN PLACE CONTROLS TO BE INCORPORATED

12 SUBSEA SUBSEA EXISTING Construction Potential damage or rupture of No specific protection to subsea Anchor pattern to be submitted to TA 2
ITEMS PIPELINES HIDRA activities / pipes Hidra existing pipelines. existing pipelines. marine Dept for approval.
SUBSEA laying / barge Physical & electronic surveys to be Operating procedures to be issued by
PIPELINES anchoring performed on site to locate and mark contractor and validated by project.
existing pipelines. Work permits to be used when works
are carried near live installations.
(distances to be defined by TA)
Specific HAZID to be carried out with
TA operations (Mc Dermott).

13 TOP SIDES ONSHORE PROXIMITY TO Crossing of Potential pipes damages or Survey and marking of existing pipes On site checking of pipes markings. 2
PIPELINES TRANSPORT onshore pipes rupture and gas release. carried out. Insure safe clearance between
ARRIVAL CORRIDOR existing and new pipes.
Shut down and depressurisation of
existing pipes while drilling new pipe
tunnel.
Specific HAZID to be carried out with
TA operations (Mc Dermott).

14 TOP SIDES ONSHORE PROXIMITY TO Crossing of Potential pipes damages or Safe distance required between new Landfall and pipes route to be agreed 1

© 2012 - IFP Training


PIPELINES HOTEL onshore pipes rupture and gas release close to pipes and hotel as per onshore pre- by TA as per safety concept
ARRIVAL FACILITIES hotel facilities. project. requirement with offshore and
onshore project teams.
Specific HAZID to be carried out with
TA along with the onshore project
during basic phase prior to EPC
award.

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 13


HAZAN and PRA

I. HAZard ANalysis II. Preliminary Risk Assessment


(PRA)
 Consists in consequence
study/modelling in order to  This semi-quantitative analysis
obtain: is specific to the scenarii based
• Safety distances as a result of: method and it aims to select a
− Accidental events (credible and limited number of major
major releases) scenarii for detailed risk
− Continuous/emergency operations
(e.g. flare, combustion effluents
quantification:
dispersion)

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 14
RISK assessment

 BY Frequency (Probability) of occurrence versus time, such as:


• 1 per year, 1 per 1 000 years, 1 per 10 000 years, 1 per 100 000 years,1 per
1 million years, 1 per 10 million years

 By type, nature, such as:


• Risk of death for 5 hours spent to go mountaineering each week-end
• Risk of death in the industrial activities at high risks (mines)
• Risk of death by road accident
• Risk of death in an accident at work in an industrial activity at low risk
• Risk of death in a fire or an explosion due to a gas leak at home
• Risk of death by lightning
 Assessment:
• By matrix ranking for a PRA,
• By QRA, quantitative evaluation, based on statistic records

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 15
Likelihood of occurrence of the scenarios (frequency) RISK – Ranking matrix

10-1
Likely

10-2
(first priority)
Unlikely

10-3
Very unlikely (tolerable if
10-4
ALARP)
Extremely
unlikely
(acceptable)
10-5

© 2012 - IFP Training


Remote
10-6
Moderate Serious Major Catastrophic Disastrous

Severity of consequences
EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 16
HAZOP (HAZARD and OPERABILITY)

Objectives:
 Identify reaction of plant during abnormal process conditions
(Malfunction or mis-operation) that could cause a hazard
 Check if design adequate to prevent hazard occurring
 Check safety interfaces with other installations, surroundings
 Record all corrective actions, remedies, or remaining hazard (at an
accepted level)
• Uses PIDs and process flow diagrams

 HAZOP focus is the PROCESS,

© 2012 - IFP Training


 Whereas HAZID is the PLANT or OPERATION

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 17


HAZOP review

Comments on the previous slide


GUIDE WORDS MEANING TYPICAL DEVIATIONS

No flow
NO or NOT Operation not performed.
or NONE Negation of Intention Operator error.
Operation stopped.
No reaction
Flow greater than design.
Temperature high.
Pressure high.
MORE or HIGH or Too much mass of particular material.
HIGHER Quantitative Increase
Increased mechanical stress.
High static charge.
High reaction rate.
More reaction time.
Low flow.
Low temperature.
LESS or Low pressure (possibly
LOW or Quantitative decrease negative pressure).
LOWER Low mass.
Low reaction rate.
Loss reaction time.

© 2012 - IFP Training


Transfer to wrong address.
A Quantitative decrease with only part of
Failure to transfer all components.
PART OF the
Failure to achieve all objectives of an
designer ’s intentions
operation.
being realised.
Misidentification reaction.

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 18


PTR (Project Technical Review)

 Interdisciplinary independent team reviews of the main


documents or studies, prepared by the project and related to
Safety and Operation such as:
• HAZID, Consequence Analysis
• Flare, vent radiation and dispersion
• Safety Concept, SOR
• Hazardous area classification
• Fire, Gas and low temperature detection
• Pressure Protection and Relief
• Emergency Shutdown and Emergency Depressurisation
• Active and Passive Fire Protection
• Lay out

© 2012 - IFP Training


• Escape Evacuation and Rescue

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 19


Safety Concept Report

Main Purpose:
 To state company requirements for the protection of assets &
personnel protection
 To indicate safety requirements for implementation in plant
design and engineering, operation
 To identify derogation to reference document (Company general
specification, certification, etc.)
 To hand out to operations team a comprehensive document on
safety design of their facilities
 To have a document with standard content that can be audited

© 2012 - IFP Training


and easily updated by basic and detailed engineering

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 20


Safety Concept Report

Content (typical)
 Bases: site conditions, meteo-oceano, surroundings, applicable references
 Risks, identification and prevention principles
 Systemised list
• Lay-out
• Hazardous areas
• Buildings-Ventilation-Pressurisation
• Blast protection
• Electrical power (UPS, Lighting…) FOR EACH ITEM.
• Fire & Gas - Safety system goal
• ESD - Company decision
• Blow down & relief - Safety system performance
- Applicable document
• Drainage (Spec, Derogation,…)
• Active fire fighting - Basic engineering development
- Detailed engineering
• Passive fire fighting development

© 2012 - IFP Training


• Personal protection - Operator modification

• Actions to be performed later by basic, detailed, operators

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 21


Basic Engineering and Detailed Design

 Actions needing follow up from Concept Selection and Pre-


Project, up to Start Up:
• HAZID Study update,
• P&ID Reviews,
• HAZOP Study,
• Consequence Analysis,
• Project Technical Reviews,
• Specific Safety Studies, i.e. Fire and Explosion Risk Analysis,
Evacuation, Escape and Rescue Analysis, Vessel Collision
Assessments…

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 22
Safety dossier

 Objectives
• Assemble all safety related documents for a permanent reference
• Give to the operator a clear and traceable view of safety design
• Have a safety basis for possible large modifications/extensions

 Content
• SAFETY CONCEPT (updating & revisions included) Summary included
if needed
• HAZOP # 1, 2, 3
• PTR # 1, 2, 3, 4
• Derogation requests and supporting documents
• List approved safety related documents
• Safety documents & studies

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 23
Safety related to Construction phase

 Identification of particular risks linked to Construction


• Definition of Construction activities,
• Identification of potential SIMOPS,
• Development of Safety Management System,
• Development of Project HSE Plan,
• Definition of Project HSE targets for HSE Performance,
• Selection of Contractors, review of their safety policy, goals, and
procedures
• Provision of HSE Resources – personnel, budget, equipment, training
requirements.
 Use of HAZID for selected operations

© 2012 - IFP Training


 Use of “JSA” (Job Safety Analysis) before a job

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 24


Health Safety & Environment (HSE)

 Technological risks
• Generated by flammable, toxic,
explosive substances
• Risks concern individuals,
environment, integrity of
installations and production, Probability LOW – Severity HIGH
surroundings & company image

Probability HIGH – Severity LOW


 Occupational risks
• Injuries or fatalities caused by the
hazards of the workplace and the
nature of the work to working
personnel, or surrounding

© 2012 - IFP Training


population

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 25


HSE main challenges

 Design challenges:
• Sound and realistic set of references, policies and goals (Zero risk
does not exist)
• Reliable risk assessing processes (data banks, calculation model,
accurate data, confirmed procedure, proven concept, new items
testing, etc…),
• Experienced personnel for specific analysis (ex: QRA, EIA) to prevent
under/over designing
 Construction challenges:
• Selecting experienced Contractors, and yards / vessels,
• Qualification of Personnel hired by contractors
• Control of many subcontrators
• Effective Company and Contractors integration, development of the
project HSE culture…

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 26
HSE main challenges

 Construction challenges (Cont):


• Bringing together hundreds / thousands of workers largely unknown
to each other,
• In a new yard / location with numerous unique hazards,
• Communication of HSE requirements, to personnel in several
languages
• Training of large numbers of personnel in a short period,
• Ensuring safe systems of work, based on good practices,
• Supervision of construction activities,
• Ensuring risk identification tools are properly and continuously
used,

© 2012 - IFP Training


Operation HAZID JSA for specific job Pre-job Tool box
talk

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 27


HSE reporting in projects

 Reporting covers all activities called for by HSE policy and procedure, in
detection, classification, notification, record and follow-up of incident
and accident, with the final aim to reduce them, and develop
AWARENESS
 Reporting is necessary to inform project participants about the safety
performance (company, authorities, contractors…) but also needed in
order to:
• To identify, and record, particular problems (recurring incident or accident
types)
• Take correct decisions with regards to remedial actions, implement them
• To be used as feedback examples and learning tools for the workforce &
management, as well as in Company statistics and record
• Compare the specific performance (with others or contractual obligations
etc.)
• As KPI (Key Performance Indicator), with given target, and monitoring

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21682_b_A_ppt_01 - 6 HSE Management 28
HSE in project reporting – Definitions (1)

An event without injury to people, but


with possible consequences to property,

© 2012 - IFP Training


planet or process

EP - 21682_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 29


HSE in project reporting – Definitions (2)

High Potential Near Miss / HiPo

An event with no impact on people, but


which could have resulted in different
circumstances in a high severity event for
people, property, process or planet.

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21682_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 30
HSE in project reporting – Definitions (3)

RECORDABLE ACCIDENTS:

 LTI = Lost Time Incident, is any accident requiring the injured person to stay off the
job for a number of days

 MTC = Medical Treatment Case, an accident where the injured person requires
medical attention, but may return to work in his original job the next day

 RWC = Restricted Work Case, an accident restricting the injured person from going
back to his original job for a given time, but allowing him to perform other work.

 FAT = Fatality

NON RECORDABLE ACCIDENTS:

Essentially First Aid Cases or FACs = the injured person can be treated by a nurse or

© 2012 - IFP Training


equivalent and return to work.

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 31


TRIR - LTIR

TRIR
Total Recordable Injury Rate

TRIR = FATALITY + LTI + RWDC + MTC x 106


MANHOURS WORKED

Accidents with and without lost time per


Million hours worked

LTIR
Lost Time Injury Rate

LTIR = FATALITY + LTI x 106


MANHOURS WORKED

© 2012 - IFP Training


Lost Time Accidents per
Million hours worked

EP - 21682_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 32


TRIR
LTIF

© 2012 - IFP Training


2011 overall Oil & Gas industry, from OGP database

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 33


Safety pyramids examples

Byrd’s Pyramid

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21682_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 34
Reducing the frequency of incidents
Pathological

Traditional Safety Programs - incident


Reactive reporting, inspections, maintenance plans

10
Traditional Safety Programs with Enhanced
Commitment - training, orientations,
Calculative investigations, supervisor's roles, communications
Advanced Approaches with Supporting
5 Management Systems - analysis, measurement,
TRI Frequency

accountability, involvement
Proactive
Modernized Approaches - behavioral
3 observation approaches, human
factors, cultural alignment, safety is a
value
1 Generative

© 2012 - IFP Training


0

TIME – Maturity of Safety Approach


EP - 21682_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 35
© 2012 - IFP Training
EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 36
ABC Behavioural Model

ACTIVATOR: Anything which sets the scene or ‘triggers’


the behaviour

BEHAVIOUR: An observable act

CONSEQUENCES: The outcome of a person’s act

© 2012 - IFP Training


Consequences Qualities

TIMING
Sooner / Later

PROBABILITY
Certain / Uncertain

IMPACT

© 2012 - IFP Training


Good + / Bad -
ABC Behavioural Model

People behave safely or unsafely because of


the
perceived consequences
of their behaviours

SC+

© 2012 - IFP Training


Exercise

Now it’s your turn in groups to analyse the


following behaviour using the ABC model:

WORKING AT HEIGHT WITHOUT A HARNESS

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 40
Who designed it this way?

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 41
Who designed it this way?

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 42
Who designed it this way?

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 43
Who designed it this way?

© 2012 - IFP Training


EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 44
© 2012 - IFP Training
EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 45
HSE management

Key points to keep in mind


 HSE attitude
• Knowledge  Confidence
• Hazards  Risks
• Assessment  Mitigation
• Training  Control
• Intervention  Build safety culture
 HSE “tools”
• Policy, procedures, objectives
• HAZID, HAZOP, HAZAN, PTR
• Safety Concept, Safety case, Safety studies,
• SIMOPS
• Environmental: BSL, EIA
 HSE culture

© 2012 - IFP Training


• Safety & environment preservation are values

EP - 21681_b_A_ppt_01 - 6. HSE Management 46

You might also like