Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SEMESTER 6
By GROUP – 15
MEMBERS:-
1. TANISHA SHARMA
2. ANIMESH KUMAR SINGH
3. ASARAR AHMED
4. RISHAV VERMA
TOPIC :-
TAX INCIDENCE
AND
ASSOCIATED BURDEN
What is Tax Incidence?
■ A tax incidence describes a case when buyers and sellers divide a tax burden.
■ A tax incidence will also lay out who bears the burden of a new tax, for
instance among producers and consumers, or among various class segments
of a population.
■ The elasticity of demand of a good can help understand the tax incidence
among parties.
■ Tax incidence reveals which group—consumers or producers—will pay the
price of a new tax. For example, the demand for prescription drugs is
relatively inelastic. Despite changes in cost, its market will remain relatively
constant.
NATURE OF TAX BURDEN
■ TAX BURDEN AND RESOURCE TRANSFER
The total burden may exceed the revenue Imposition of tax may lead to change
collected because an efficiency loss or in factor supply, hence in total output.
excess burden results. As a result of this That is, changes in output may result
additional burden, as referred to Because of adjustments in factor inputs
deadweight loss, the consumer expenditure pattern in response to changes in after-tax
gets distorted. factor rewards.
Employment Effects
■ BUDGET INCIDENCE
It examines the changes in household positions which results if the combined
effects of tax and expenditure changes are considered.
Burden distribution among
whom?
Substitution of one tax for another will improve the position of some
households and worsen that of others. Changes in the position of any
one household may be measured in terms of the resulting change in its
real income. Real income may change because disposable income
changes or because there is a change in the price of the products
purchased.
Note that the disposable real income (DRY) of a household
may be defined as
DRY = (E-Ty)/(P+Ts) = DY/GP
where E = Earnings, Ty = Income tax, P = Price (at factor
cost) of products bought, Ts = Sales tax addition thereto, DY
is disposable or after-tax money income and GP is the
Gross (or Market) Price.
Burden Impact from Sources and
Uses Side
Sources Side Uses Side
Primary effects of tax changes which Primary effects which operate on the
operates on the earnings or sources side expenditure or uses side of its account
of the household account will change Ty. will change Ts. An increase in sales tax
Thus, an increase in income tax lowers lowers DRY via an increase in Ts and
DRY via an increase in TY and hence in GP. In addition, the general
hence a fall in DY. In addition, the general adjustment process may result in secondary
adjustment process may result in secondary changes from the uses side, or in P.
changes from the sources side, or in E.
Although such secondary effects may be of great importance to particular households,
chances are that they will not result in a systematic offset to such changes in the size distribution of
DRY as have resulted in line with the primary effects.
Measuring Changes in
Distribution
A comprehensive measure of incidence may be
obtained by comparing the state of distribution
before and after a particular tax change.
Measuring the cumulative percentage of
disposable income on the vertical axis and
the cumulative percentage of households on
the horizontal axis, the curve OAB shows the
percentage of income received by the lowest
10, 20, 30, etc percent of households.
If the distribution was equal, curve OAB would
coincide with the straight line OB. Given a state
of unequal distribution, the ratio of two areas
OABC/OBC is taken as the index of equality.
Suppose now that the distributional pattern with
the existing tax system is as indicated by
0AB but due to tax change it becomes OA’B.
This means that distribution has become more equal
– since OA'BC/OBC>OABC/OBC,
hence an effect of progressive tax change occurs.
However, the total effect on distribution depends
not only on the extent of the progressive nature of
particular taxes but also on the overall
level of taxation and the underlying distribution
of income. A high but moderately progressive level of
taxation may have a greater impact upon the
distribution of income than does a low-level but
sharply progressive system.
REFERENCES :-
■ Class Notes
■ Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th Edition,
by Richard A. Musgrave and Peggy B. Musgrave