CHAPTER 7: INTERNATIONAL TRADE STRUCTURE Connection btw production & trade
GDP: National income
Y = C + I + G + (X-I)
As columnist Robert Kuttner says:
Trade is always political… World Trade as a percentage of World GDP 1990-2015 YOUTUBE VIDEO
The deceptive promise of free trade
DW Documentary 42:26 MIN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnW9Z QtI1_E YOUTUBE VIDEO
How do tariffs work? | CNBC Explains
4:57 MIN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKC MnCZyxiQ WTO: World Trade Organization Check its website https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/ti f_e/org6_e.htm Trends in international trade: what has changed in the last decades? Fundamental forces shaping the future of international trade: • demography, • investment, • technology, • The disposition and availability of energy and other natural resources, • transportation costs • institutions Winners and Losers… The unprecedented increase in trade in the last 50 years has created high levels of interdependence between countries. Controversies in the international trade system: Some countries win some others lose… Within winning (and losing) countries: there are some winner & some loser groups Nation states want to increase the benefits of international trade while limiting its negative political, economic, and social effects on producer groups and society in general. Winners and Losers… After the global financial crisis (in 2007): citizens of developed industrialized countries became more nationalistic and demanded greater trade protectionism. The political right in Europe and the United States had traditionally pushed for more free trade. However, in the 2010s important segments of both the left and right blamed globalization for destroying national industries and good jobs. Winners and Losers… Populists and nationalists in the EU: criticize free trade (those who felt left behind during European integration). Trade protectionism is also associated with a fear of becoming too dependent on other nations (including food and national defense). Without a set of international trade rules, nationalistic trade policies could easily undermine the global production structure. Ironically, China has now positioned itself as the defender of free trade. Winners and Losers… Developing countries that open up to free trade without appropriate institutions or local industry strength can be made worse off, as when competition from cheap imports drives small companies and farmers out of business. Ha-Joon Chang explains that the developed states are “kicking away the ladder” (taking away the choice to protect) from the developing nations, even though few of today’s industrialized countries actually practiced free trade in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Changing World Trading System
In 1948, the GATT became the primary organization
responsible for the liberalization of international trade. Through a series of multilateral negotiations called rounds, the world’s main trading nations agreed to reduce their own protectionist barriers in return for freer access to the markets of others. Changing World Trading System
Two basic principles of the GATT are reciprocity and
nondiscrimination. Trade concessions are reciprocal—that is, all member nations agree to lower their trade barriers together. Nondiscrimination has two components: most favored nation (MFN) treatment and national treatment. Changing World Trading System
MFN treatment means not giving preferential
treatment to the imports of one country over those of another. National treatment requires that a country treat imported goods the same as equivalent domestically produced goods. The GATT’s Tokyo Round (1973–1979) addressed the growing number of non-tariff barriers (NTBs). Changing World Trading System
Keep in mind that as an organization the GATT could
not enforce its own rules; rather, members were responsible for fulfilling trade obligations based on trust and diplomacy. Rules were established to limit a range of discriminatory trade practices involving export subsidies, countervailing duties, dumping, government purchasing, government-imposed product standards, and licensing requirements on importers. Neomercantilism on the rise Prioritize local industries
Buy locally produced goods.
The United States and Germany achieved their impressive
late nineteenth- and early twentieth century growth behind high tariff walls; many other countries also had some kind of protection. As outlined in Chapter 3, Alexander Hamilton and Friedrich List challenged liberal trade doctrine. From their mercantilist perspective, free trade was merely a rationale for England to maintain its dominant advantage. Neomercantilism on the rise In the 19th century, free trade policies were enforced at the point of a gun, as when the United States forced Japan to open its doors to U.S. trade in the 1860s and when the European powers forced open China and the Ottoman Empire in the nineteenth century. Neomercantilism on the rise For Hamilton, supporting U.S. infant industries and achieving national independence required the use of protectionist trade measures. List argued that polices such as import tariffs and export subsidies were necessary (infant industries to compete on an equal footing). …for free trade to work for all, it must be preceded by greater equality between states. Strategic Trade The term “strategic trade policy” became synonymous with efforts by states to stimulate exports and hinder foreign access to domestic markets through non-tariff measures. Proactive strategic trade policy often involved extending support to infant industries and providing export subsidies to large companies. It also included “the use of threats, promises, and other bargaining techniques to alter the trading regime in ways that improve the market position of one’s national corporations.” The idea of strategic trade policy: comparative advantage is not fixed; it is dynamic. Tokyo’s Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) adopted numerous trade support measures. Many of these measures were aimed at creating comparative advantages… Free Trade Versus Fair Trade
Gradually the notion of fair trade gained
prominence recently. It is about creating rules that attempted to level the playing field when it came to acceptable amounts and types of protection amongst trade partners. Free Trade Versus Fair Trade Fair trade was proposed to safeguard producers from developing countries. North-South Divide The EU, China, Japan, the United States, and South Korea together account for 74 percent of the world’s exported manufactured goods. If we look at the merchandise exports of the Middle East and Africa, we find that in 2016 more than 60 percent of all their exports were fuel and minerals. Likewise, for South and Central America, 70 percent of their merchandise exports were fuel, minerals, and agricultural products. The Middle East, Africa, and Latin America are also vulnerable to swings in global prices for primary products. Volatile export prices have sometimes caused severe economic recessions, triggered debt crises, or led to unsustainable economic growth. RECENT TRADE PATTERNS: REGIONALIZATION • The share of intra-regional trade in Asian exports rose from 42% in 1990 to 52% in 2011. • Asia poses the largest share of intra-regional trade in exports of any geographic region when the European Union is counted as a single entity. RECENT TRADE PATTERNS: INTERDEPENDENCE • international supply chains: the value added by each location in internationally configured production processes. • International supply chains play a major role in today’s world economy. Types of Regional Trade Regimes
Free Trade Area: No internal tariffs (NAFTA)
Common Market: No internal tariff; common external tariff (EU pre-1992) Single Market: Same as common market plus common coordinated economic regulation (EU post-1992) Monetary Union: Common currency (EU post-1999) REGIONAL TRADE BLOCS The USA has signed more than 300 bilateral agreements and belongs to a number of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) like NAFTA and APEC. RTAs are often easier to form because fewer states are involved. Some see RTAs as obstacles to free trade, because they proliferate tariffs and preferences between the bloc’s members that become durably institutionalized. New Trends: digital revolution
The digital revolution has made liberalization of trade in services
an important issue in international trade negotiations. Countries with leading technology-based corporations are spearheading the effort to gain access to new markets for digitally delivered services throughout the world. Balance of Payments “balance of payments” (or BOP) table is used to measure, visualize, and categorize any given country’s economic transactions with other nations in a calendar year. BOP summarizes all international economic transactions in a given year.” BOP helps governments to see their overall positions regarding the international trade figures, money flows, and capital interactions with other nations. There are two major sections in the BOP: 1- Current Account 2- Capital Account Balance of Payments Credit Debit A- Current Account export of goods import of goods