Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Soil Compaction
COMPACTION
𝑁 𝑏 ∗𝑛 ∗ 𝑊 h ∗ h𝑑
𝐸=
𝑉 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑑
Nb Number of blows per layer
n Number of layers
Wh Weight of hammer
hd Height of drop of hammer
EFFECT OF COMPACTION ENERGY
ON A SANDY CLAY
EFFECT OF SOIL TYPE
EFFECT OF SOIL TYPE
Problem 1
Determine the compaction energy per unit volume of
Methods A, B and C for:
16.81 10
17.84 12
18.41 14
18.33 16
17.84 18
17.35 20
Problem 4
18
. .
17
.
16
. .
15
.
14
10 12 14 16 18 20
COMPACTION
VS
CONSOLIDATION
FIELD COMPACTION
COMPACTION EQUIPMENTS:
5. Vibroflotation
6. Dynamic Compaction
7. Blasting
FIELD COMPACTION
Relative Compaction.
𝛾 𝑑 ( 𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑)
𝑅𝐶= 𝑥 100 %
𝛾 𝑑 (𝑚𝑎𝑥 −𝑙𝑎𝑏 )
for granular soils;
𝑅0
𝑅𝐶=
1 − 𝑅𝐷 (1− 𝑅¿¿ 0) 𝑥 100 % ¿
𝛾 𝑑( 𝑚𝑖𝑛 )
𝑅 0=
𝛾 𝑑 ( 𝑚𝑎𝑥 )
Problem 5
Laboratory compaction test results for a clayey silt are
given in the following table:
Moisture Content, % Dry Unit Weight, kN/cu.m
6 14.80
8 17.45
9 18.52
11 18.90
12 18.50
14 16.90
Problem 5
Following are the results of a field unit weight
determination test performed on the same soil by
means of sand cone method.
• Calibrated dry density of Ottawa Sand = 1570
kg/cu.m
• Calibrated mass of Ottawa sand to fill the cone =
0.545 kg
• Mass of jar + cone + sand (Before use) = 7.59 kg
• Mass of jar cone + sand (After use) = 4.78 kg
• Mass of moist soil from the hole = 3.007 kg
• Moisture content = 10%
Problem 5