Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Understand the question, answer it completely and prove it can be done and will work
Process:
▪ Identify the issues – immediate, underlying - and summarize as a question
▪ Identify the objectives and aspirations
▪ Identify complications & constraints
▪ Identify & apply relevant models and do research to enhance understanding
▪ Develop and evaluate hypotheses (options)
▪ Propose good solution with implementation
▪ Identify risks , mitigation and contingency strategies
▪ Demonstrate impact
Elements:
1.Understand immediate question, underlying issue
2.Identify relevant models and frameworks
Tools:
▪3 Whys
▪ Models, frameworks, issue trees
Protip:
▪ The immediate issue and hints at underlying are usually found in
the introduction and/or conclusion of case
Underlying issue:
•the cause of the immediate
•if case is an opportunity pursuit, underlying
Underlying
What causes it issue = aspiration ie why are we chasing this
opportunity?
Immediate issue: You are hungry at 11 am Immediate issue: Want to expand your
business
Big question: How to ensure you have Big question: How to grow your
food in the morning? business?
“3 Whys” approach:
Immed Why Why Why Imme Why Why Why
d
No Sleep in Up late
breakfast Increase Sell Retire
profits business
No No food No car for
Hungry breakfast groceries Grow Int’l known Build
Grow brand legacy
No Can’t Don’t
breakfast cook know how Diversify Rely on one Reduce
revenues source risk
Key: Must understand the underlying to completely and effectively solve immediate
Copyright Sofy Caryannopoulos
Understand the issue – issue tree
Decision criteria
▪ Needed to judge options or ensure solution addresses key objectives
▪ Can be applied to overall solution or to questions with obvious options,
i.e. solution aligns with company mission, increases reputation for social
responsibility and is focused on Canadian market vs. which country do we
expand into?
Elements:
1.Complications/constraints, strengths & opportunities [feasible]
2.Complete solution components [complete]
Tools:
▪ Models, frameworks, issue trees; Diamond-E plus…
▪ Research on industry, competition, customer and environment
Diamond-E
▪ Human resources are largely non-tech savvy
▪ Already have a lot of debt so can’t borrow to expand
▪ Technology talent is in short supply and tends to go to larger firms
Generic strategies
▪ Product is viewed as commodity – hard to differentiate
▪ Low cost requires large scale but markets are too small
▪ Think about the issue – what items are relevant and related?
▪ Eg. Market strategy or marketing case – advertising spend
▪ Horizontal analysis: Changes in relevant items over time
▪ Vertical analysis: is something really big or too small relative to revenues or
profits?
▪ What line items will be affected by your solution and in what way? Do you
see any obvious constraints, i.e. too much debt, very little cash, too few
human resources, production capacity?
▪ Market strategy/expansion case: market shares, relative price, growth,
competitors
▪ Issue:
▪ What elements make up this issue?
▪ What is the company missing or doing poorly?
▪ Solution:
▪ Options: how could we solve this? What must we consider?
▪ Tactics: What must company do to execute a complete
solution?
▪ Strategy: What underlying issue to focus on and resolve
Application:
▪ Guidance for 3 whys
▪ Guidance for implementation
▪ Can be combined for complete solution
▪ Can be used to address issues from other disciplines
Copyright Sofy Caryannopoulos
Understand the issue – Diamond – E plus…
Marketing
HR:
Innovation
Goals
Governing Thought:
Big question – big idea
Acme can reduce costs by $10mm in the
next 2 years through some operational
improvements
Three tactical
strategies
support Re-engineer core Outsource non-core Differentiate service levels
overall functions to save $5mm functions to save $3mm to save $2mm
strategy
EXTERNAL EXTERNAL
Customer relationships Customer lock-in
Brand recognition Lack of brand awareness
Business network Limited/no network
Expanding market potential Limited market potential
Low competition Customer High competition
Low entry barriers Competition High entry barriers
Barriers
Ref: Consulting section 5.1 and figure 9.7
Copyright Sofy Caryannopoulos
Force field analysis – application
Use these to strengthen Address these in your
your argument 2. Look at these solution so it’s complete,
JUSTIFICATION OF STRATEGY STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION
feasible & effective
and think
INTERNAL Resources INTERNAL
Diamond
Cost – E – (scale)
advantages what Capabilities Diamond
Lack of–experience
E – resource or
resource
Uniqueor resources
capabilities do capabilities
Lack of product you need but
knowledge
you have products
Innovative that are don’t
Lack have orknowledge
of market will create
consistent with solution,
Product knowledge resistance?
Limited Make
financial sure I
resources
make solution
Market possible?
knowledge address them
Inappropriate to make
culture, process
Use as proof of
Production feasibility
capacity recoof
Lack feasible
skills
1. Given what I Inefficient scale
Financial resources
am thinking or
wanting to
EXTERNAL recommend… Diamond – E – what
EXTERNAL
Diamond – E – what
Customer relationships Porter’s,
Customer PEST or other
lock-in
Porter’s, PEST or other
Brand recognition factors
Lack are important
of brand awareness to
factors are important to 3. Look at these
Business network consider
Limited/noandnetwork
will pose
consider and are aligned and think
Expanding market potential challenges or constraints?
Limited market potential
with my reco and make Customer
Low competition Make
High sure I avoid or
competition
this an opportunity? Competition
Low entry barriers address
High them
entry barriers
Barriers
Ref: Consulting section 5.1 and figure 9.7
Copyright Sofy Caryannopoulos
Addressing forces against to ensure feasibility
A complete solution outlines not just the actions, but the order and the timing
Insightful risk discussion requires that you think about the likelihood that a risk
will occur and the impact it is likely to have
risks
▪ Have a plan for all three risks
Impact
2
1 ▪ Prioritize them:
▪ Identify how much damage but also the
likelihood a risk will occur
3 ▪ Focus your energy and resources on most
Low
Three approaches
1.Calculation of what solution achieves
2.Identification of what would have to occur at a minimum via solution to
meet objective and show that this is satisfied – pick most critical
driver/assumption and show you are reaching this threshold
3.Show ROI – if it’s >1 then it’s worthwhile!
More on presentation S:
Q = question (issue topic + objective)
structuring in your lab A = answer (what are we telling you to do)
Q:
S = situation (key context pieces)-key scenario
manual C:
pieces to keep in mind
A:
STRATEGIC C = key complication/constraint (what we have to
RECOMMENDATION - thesis work within or address to make solution feasible)
STRATEGIC
S: S: S:
&
Q: Q: Q:
TACTICAL
C: C: C:
RECOMMENDATION
A: A: A:
TACTICAL
S: &
Q: OPERATIONAL
C: RECOMMENDATION
A:
Process:
▪ Identify the questions – immediate, underlying,
▪ Identify the objectives and aspirations
▪ Apply models and do research to understand complications & constraints
▪ Develop and evaluate hypotheses (options)
▪ Propose good solution with implementation
▪ Identify risks , mitigation and contingency strategies
▪ Demonstrate impact
Re: Lab manual and Consulting 5.1, 5.2, 5.3
Excellent video that shows a walk-through of new product launch that applies
Diamond-E, Porter’s, 4C (company, competition, customer, product, and ROI: :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNdh65RllVU
Additional resources:
Marc Cosentino – Case in Point
Victor Cheng – Case Interview Secrets
Wharton Consulting Club Casebook
Harvard Business School Management Consulting Club Case Interview Guide
Copyright Sofy Caryannopoulos
Apply to case
Solution completeness,
What models are relevant? constraints & enablers
(feasibility)
What KSF
indicators can
Profitability we look at to
framework help
diagnose?
Understanding the
situation When evaluating a business situation
think about company, competition,
product, customer
Situation:
▪ big competition, uses cost leadership
▪ largest customer segment wants good product range and advice
Constraints/complications:
▪ too small to buy large quantities – lower costs tough - will make competing on
price challenging = differentiation needed
▪ products are commoditized – need to differentiate something else
▪ financial and physical constraints make variety challenging
Profitability
framework
EXIT O X X
Increase volume O O O
Expand offering O O /
Forcefield analysis
Three levels of recommendation
Risks & mitigation
Demonstrating effectiveness
▪ Option to pursue:
▪ What are the main actions we have to take to execute?
▪ What are the constraints or complications we have to address?
INTERNAL
INTERNAL Lack of experience
Dedicated sales people Lack of market knowledge
Product knowledge Limited financial resources
Production capacity Inefficient scale
EXTERNAL
Lack of brand awareness
EXTERNAL Strong competition
Customer relationships Few strong relationships with
Expanding market potential professional contractors and
weekend warriors
OR Could show that amount of lawn & garden needed to do same as appliances
Probability
Risk Mitigation Contingency
What are the major costs? Are they variable or fixed? Will they go up or
down? Can you estimate based on percentage of revenues?
Assuming you can get profit margin to 7% it’s $1 mil/0.07 = $14,300,000 revenues
(roughly) needed
$27 billion industry revenue – 30% held by large companies leaves $18.9 bn
Compared to $14.3 million shown above means business has to be slightly larger
than average
1. What are the components of a good solution? What does each one contribute to
ensuring a GOOD solution? What happens if one is not fulfilled?
2. What role do models play in case solution? How do you apply them? How do you
know which models to draw upon?
3. What is the significance of forcefield analysis in the context of case analysis? What
are its components, why are they individually important and how do you apply
them in a case analysis?
4. What is the difference between objectives and decision criteria? What role does
each play in the case analysis process?
5. When using a forcefield analysis, how do you know what factors to consider and
how to address them within the content of your solution?
6. Where does quantitative analysis factor into your case analysis?
7. Why are the aspirations of the organization and decision maker important to
consider when formulating a recommendation?
8. Why is it important to identify risks? What is the difference between a mitigation
plan and a contingency plan? What is the connection between the contingency plan
and your recommendation and the options that you rejected?
9. When trying to assess the underlying causes of a profitability issue, what course
models can you use and how would you apply them?
10. For each key performance indicator, what type of underlying problem might each
KPI signal?