The document discusses the structure and roles of different debate styles, including Asian parliamentary and British parliamentary debate. It provides information on what a debater needs to do, such as thinking critically and presenting arguments logically. It also discusses rhetorical devices, tips for public speaking, common flaws in arguments, and how to construct arguments. The scoring of debates focuses on the content, delivery, and structure of arguments.
The document discusses the structure and roles of different debate styles, including Asian parliamentary and British parliamentary debate. It provides information on what a debater needs to do, such as thinking critically and presenting arguments logically. It also discusses rhetorical devices, tips for public speaking, common flaws in arguments, and how to construct arguments. The scoring of debates focuses on the content, delivery, and structure of arguments.
The document discusses the structure and roles of different debate styles, including Asian parliamentary and British parliamentary debate. It provides information on what a debater needs to do, such as thinking critically and presenting arguments logically. It also discusses rhetorical devices, tips for public speaking, common flaws in arguments, and how to construct arguments. The scoring of debates focuses on the content, delivery, and structure of arguments.
•Structured •Win by creating the most convincing argument Motion •Controversial •No correct answer Who is a debater? • Think critically and analyze a problem • Present thoughts logically and elegantly • Speak skillfully in public • Listen to and interpret information carefully and quickly • Broaden understanding of issues Rhetoric •Persuade through invention •Argument arrangement •Remembering speech •Enhancing delivery Tips to improve speaking • Get rid of filler words • Find synonyms • Slow pace • Be calm • Control movement • Maintain eye contact • Diversify tone Rebuttal Flaws • False dichotomy • Assertion • Morally flawed • Correlation rather than causation • Failure to deliver promises • Straw man • Contradiction • Comparing conclusion to reality Asian parliamentary •Parliamentary – Persuasiveness, Logical Reasoning, Wit •Two opposing teams (Government & Opposition) Asian parliamentary… •Government Proposes and defends motion •Opposition Refutes and negates motion Asian parliamentary… •Government Members Prime Minister (opens debate, defines motion, advances arguments)…context, parameters Asian parliamentary… •Government Members Deputy Prime Minister (refutes opposition case, reestablish gov’t claim, advances arguments) Asian parliamentary… •Government Members Whip (makes an issue-based rebuttal of opp case, summarizes gov’t case) Asian parliamentary… •Opposition Members Leader (responds to gov’t case: clash, advances arguments); (May challenge motion) Asian parliamentary… •Opposition Members Deputy Leader (refutes case of DPM, reestablishes case of opp, advances an argument) Asian parliamentary… •Opposition Members Whip (makes an issue-based rebuttal of gov’t case, summarizes opp case) British parliamentary •4 teams (2 members each) First proposition Second proposition First opposition Second opposition British parliamentary… •First proposition PM, DPM •Second proposition Member, Whip British parliamentary… •First opposition LO, DLO •Second opposition Member, Whip Point of Information •After the first minute up to sixth minute •No POI in reply speeches ***Point of Order ***Point of Personal Privilege Argumentation • Start with: personal anecdote, a nifty quote, shocking stats, an image that will prompt a reaction • Label of argument (because)- THW change the Philippine national anthem because it is imperative to give positive meaning to the song Argumentation… • explanation and logic- outline why the motion stands or fails, theory [change involves revising for better meaning (particular trait)= better meaning means positive attributes (trait leads to outcome)= promote positivity in the country (desired effect)= the national anthem must be changed(prove motion)] Argumentation… • primary example- prominent case, trends and statistics, proof of authority, proof by analogy, hypothetical examples • link example to logic • secondary example • link to the motion Avoid • Tautology • Truism • Specific-knowledge case Scoring • Matter (content) • Manner (delivery) • Method (structure of arguments) Bobby Mc Gee O. Lee • Email – bobbymcgeelee@gmail.com • LinkedIn – Bobby Mc Gee Lee • Instagram – bobbymcgeelee • Twitter - @bmgolee • TikTok - @bmgolee