Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
3
Definition of Scour
- Scour is the removal of sediment (soil and
rocks) from stream beds and stream banks
caused by moving water.
- Scouring can be defined as a process due to
which the particles of the soil or rock around
the periphery of the abutment or pier of the
highway bridge spanning over a water body,
gets eroded and removed over a certain depth
called scour depth. It usually occurs when the
velocity of the flowing water increases or
crosses the limiting value that the soil particles
can easily handle. 4
-It has been estimated that over 60% of the highway
bridges are being collapsed due to scouring.
5
Components of Scour
Total Scour 6
Long-Term Aggradation or Degradation
7
8
Contraction Scour
-Involves removal of material from bed
and banks across most of the channel
width. May be “Live-bed Contraction
Scour” or “Clear-water Contraction
Scour”.
- Clear-water scour occurs where there is no
transport of bed material upstream of the
crossing or encroachment and live-bed scour
occurs where there is transport of bed
material from the upstream reach into the
crossing or encroachment.
9
Local Scour
At Piers: Pier scour occurs due to the
acceleration of flow around the pier and the
formation of flow vortices. The “horseshoe
vortices” remove material from the base of the
pier and creates a scour hole.
11
Abutment scour
12
This bridge (location unknown) failed due to scour at the
base of the piers caused by a turbulent horseshoe vortex
system. 13
14
DEFINING CHANNEL INSTABILITY
Channel instability relates to lateral (horizontal) and
elevational (vertical) changes in the river bed, which
leads to the following problems for the natural and
human-built environment:
1) Threats to roadways, utilities, infrastructure and
development in the geomorphologic floodplain,
2) Loss of property due to channel migration,
3)Loss of trout habitat, due to the change from a
pool-riffle sequence to predominantly fast moving
water in continuous riffle sections,
4) Loss of wetlands and riparian zones due to high
width-to-depth ratios and lateral bank migration
15
Channel instability, as a result of disruption of the
channel equilibrium, is characterized by:
1) Vertical Instability, leading to changes in the channel
bed elevation level by deposition of material
(aggradation) or erosion of the bed material
(degradation). This is a major problem at bridges where
the foundations become exposed; at utility crossings
where pipelines can be washed away; or at critical
floodplain areas where water can overtop the riverbanks.
2) Lateral Instability, where erosion or deposition at the
channel banks causes the channel to migrate horizontally.
This can drastically affect property and infrastructure,
and is the most easily recognizable result of channel
instability.
16
EROSION, ACCRETION AND SEDIMENT
BED MOTION
Erosion= Decrease in channel bed elevation
resulting from removal of sediment material
Accretion= Increase of channel bed elevation
resulting from the accumulation of sediment
deposits. It is also called deposition and
aggradation.
Erosion and accretion must be predicted using
the continuity equation for the bed sediment
material. 17
Sediment continuity equation
Fig 6.3
20
Continuity principle for bed material
21
6.3
6.3
22
APPLICATION
23
24
25
Contraction Scour Types
Live-bed Contraction Scour:
This occurs when bed material is
already being transported into the
contracted bridge section from
upstream of the approach section
(before the Contraction reach).
26
Contraction Scour Types
27
Live-bed or Clear-water Determination
28
Live-bed or Clear-water Determination
Clear-water: Vc > mean velocity
29
Live-bed Contraction Scour Determination
6/7 k2
Q2 W1 n2
K1
y2
y1 Q
1 W
2 n1 (Laursen, 1960) And y s y 2 y0
Where:
Ys = Average depth of scour
Y0 = Average depth of flow in the contracted section before
scour
Y1 = depth of flow in the upstream of bridge
Y2 = depth of flow in the contracted section
W1 = bottom width upstream of bridge
W2 = bottom width in the contracted section
Q1 = flow in the upstream of bridge transporting sediment
Q2 = flow in the contracted section [Often this is equal to the
total discharge unless the total flood flow is reduced by relief bridges
or water overtopping the approach roadway]
n1 = Manning’s “n” for the upstream of bridge
n2 = Manning’s “n” for the contracted section
K1 and K2 = Exponents depending upon the mode of bed 30
material transport
Live-bed Contraction Scour Determination
1
2 1
V* gy1S1 2
Where:
V* = Shear Velocity in the upstream section
w = Fall velocity of bed material
T = Shear stress on the bed
p = Density of water
g = Acceleration of gravity 31
32
Live-bed Contraction Scour Determination
6/7
y2 Q2 W1
K1
y1 Q1 Modified (Laursen, 1960) And y s y2 y0
W2
Where:
Ys = Average depth of scour
Y0 = Average depth of flow in the contracted section before scour
Y1 = depth of flow in the upstream of bridge
Y2 = depth of flow in the contracted section
W1 = bottom width upstream of bridge
W2 = bottom width in the contracted section
Q1 = flow in the upstream of bridge transporting sediment
Q2 = flow in the contracted section
K1 = Exponents depending upon the mode of bed material transport
33
Clear-water Contraction Scour Determination
6
ys Q
7 (Laursen, 1963)
0.13 1 7 1
y1 D 3 y 6W
m 1
40
Pier Scour Factors
• The greater the velocity upstream of the pier the deeper the scour
• An increase in flow depth can have a significant influence on the
scour depth. It can be as much as twice.
• As the width of the pier increases, so does the scour depth
• If pier is skewed to the flow, the length can have an influence on
the scour depth. When doubling the length, the scour depth
increased by 30-60% depending upon angle of attack.
• Size and gradation of the bed material generally will not have an
effect on the scour depth. What differs is the time it takes to
achieve the maximum scour.
• Shape of the pier plays an important part in the scour depth.
• Formation of debris can increase the width of the pier, change its
shape or change its projected length. 41
Live-bed and Clear-water Scour Determination
by CSU (Richardson 1990 eq.)
42
Common Pier Shapes
To be used for determining the K1 (Pier Nose Shape correction factor) in equation:
0.65
Ys a
2.0 K1 K 2 K 3 K 4
0.43
Fr1
Y1 Y1
43
0.65
Ys a
K1 is the Pier Nose Shape correction factor in equation: 2.0 K1 K 2 K 3 K 4 Fr1
0.43
Y1 Y1
Y1 Y1
Notes: K2 should only be applied when the entire length is subjected to the attack of flow
K2 max = 5.0 45
K3 is the Bed Condition correction factor in equation:
0.65
Ys a
2.0 K1 K 2 K 3 K 4
0.43
Fr1
Y1 Y1
46
K4 is the Correction Factor for armoring by bed-material size
in equation:
K4 min = 0.4
If D50 < 2mm or D95 < 20mm, then K4 = 1.0
If D50 >= 2mm and D95 >= 20mm then
0.65
Ys a
2.0 K1 K 2 K 3 K 4
0.43
Fr1
Y1 Y1
K 4 VR
0.15
V1 VicD50
where VR 0
VcD50 VicD95
0.053
Dx
VicDx 0.645 VcDx
a
1 1
6 3
VcDx K uY1 Dx 47
VicDx = Approach velocity required to initiate scour at the
pier for grain size Dx
VcDx = critical velocity for incipient motion for grain size
Dx
y1 = Depth of flow just upstream of the pier, excluding
local scour, m (ft)
V1 = Velocity of the approach flow just upstream of the
pier, m/s (ft/s)
Dx = Grain size for which x percent of the bed material is
finer, m (ft)
a = Pier width (ft)
Ku = 6.19 SI Units
Ku = 11.17 English Units
48
Local Scour at Abutments
Local scour occurs at abutments when
the abutment and embankment
obstruct the flow. The obstruction of
the flow forms a horizontal vortex
starting at the upstream end of the
abutment and running along the toe of
the abutment and forms a vertical wake
vortex at the downstream end of the
abutment. 49
Abutment failure Causes
• Overtopping of abutments or approach
embankments
• Lateral channel migration or stream widening
processes
• Contraction scour
• Local scour at one or both abutments
50
Abutment Scour Factors
Velocity of the flow just upstream of the abutment
Depth of flow
Length of the abutment if skewed to the flow.
51
Live-bed and Clear-water
Scour Determination
52
I - Froelich’s (1989) Live-bed Abutment Scour Equation
(ratio of the length of the abutment (normal to flow) to flow depth <= 25)
Ys 0.57 0.61
2.27 K1 K 2 ( L' ) 0.43 y a Fr1 1
Ya
53
Abutment Coefficients
K1
K2
54
Abutment Skew
Ys K1
4 K 2 Fr 10.33
Y1 0.55
K1 = Coefficient for abutment shape
K2 = Coefficient for angle of embankment to flow
as calculated for Froelich’s equation
Fr = Froude Number based upon the velocity
and depth adjacent to and upstream of the
abutment
Y1 = Depth of flow at the abutment on the
overbank or in the main channel. 56
Suggested design approach
No reliable equations are available to predict all
hydraulic flow conditions that may be reasonably
expected to occur. Engineering judgement is required.
Place piers & abutment on scour resistant foundation
such as rock or deep foundation.
Pilings should be driven below the elevation of long-
term degradation and contraction scour.
Need to consider the potential for lateral channel
instability.
Spread footings should be placed below the elevation of
total scour. 57
General Design Procedure
58
Exercise how to run the software for
scours t bridges!
ABSCOUR program (a free software)
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74