• Title • Abstract • The Problem • Literature Review • Methods • Institutional Review Board? Proposals: Title • Title – “A Study of the Efficacy of Vocational Interest Inventories Versus Personality Inventories Using Multivariate Analysis in the Prediction of Job Satisfaction for Adults, Aged 18-24 in Their First Year of Employment” Proposals: A Problem Statement • In simplest terms, a problem statement is an inquiry about the relationship between two or more variables. – “Are children whose mothers work outside the home more self-sufficient than children of mothers who do not?” Proposals: A Problem Statement • The Research Problem (2-8 pages) – A well-developed statement of the problem or research question is a result of sifting through a mountain other people’s findings to extract those few question which you want to address. – Example: There is a significant relationship between bilingualism and self concept. A) do college students who are fluent in a language other than English achieve higher scores on the Tennessee Self Concept Scales than those who speak only English; B) Is there a significant difference in scores on the Tennessee Self Concept Scales among people whose second language is Spanish, French, or German? Proposals: Literature Review • Each cited source should help further your thesis/dissertation • Locate your study among similar published studies • Identify strengths and limitations of those studies • Demonstrate what contribution your study can make to that domain of knowledge Proposals: Literature Review • Make sure you develop a detailed outline first, to be reviewed by your adviser. • Use headings within the chapter, conforming to your outline, which allow you to break the review into discrete sections that are more easily handled. Proposals: Methods The main purpose of the Methods section is to describe (and if necessary defend) the experimental design and then provide enough detail so that a competent worker can repeat the experiments. Many (probably most) will people will not read this section. 1) The usual order of presentation is chronological. 2) Use subheadings, preferably matching them to those in the Results section. 3) Be precise, objective and accurate. 4) Use graphics (tables, graphs, photographs) as needed.