Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENGLISH FORACADEMICAND
PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES
Analyzes the arguments used by
the writer/s in manifestoes
OBJECTIVES:
It is a proposition statement in an
argument that rationalizes or
supports the conclusion by
providing some evidence.
The definition of a premise is a statement
or idea which serves as the basis for an
argument. A premise is a powerful concept
and an important element in logical
argument. In a kind of logical argument
called a syllogism, two premises are used
to imply a conclusion. The following
example of a syllogism shows two
premises and a conclusion:
Premise 1: John does not like any sour
things.
Premise 2: All lemons are sour.
Conclusion: John does not like lemons.
Syllogism, and the premises on which
it is based, is a key element
in deductive reasoning. Deductive
reasoning is the process of reasoning
from one or more statements to reach
a logical conclusion. This method of
reasoning is contrasted with inductive
reasoning, in which a conclusion is
reached via observation.
Example: “All mammals are warm-blooded
[major premise]; whales are mammals [minor
premise]; therefore, whales are warm-blooded
[conclusion]."
ARGUM
DEDUCTIVE ENTS INDUCTIVE
DEDUCTIVE
For a deductive argument, you start with a premise
that is assumed to be true or correct and there is no
more logical reason than a true premise.
Examples:
● It usually takes me an hour to get to work, so if I leave at 8:00 I’ll
probably get there by 9.
● My best friend advised me not to skip class, and her advice is
usually good, so I’ll follow it.
● True education makes us behave in the most acceptable manner.
If your ways are objectible , you’re not truly educated.
EXERCISE 1
Activity: To Argue or Not To Argue
Sample answer:
(1) We must resist all efforts to allow the government to
censor entertainment. (2) Freedom of speech and
expressions are essential to a democratic form of
government. (3) As soon as we allow some censorship, it
won't be long before censorship will be used to silence
the opinions critical of the government. (4) The next
thing we know, we will have no more freedom than the
Germans did under Hitler.
Answer: YES
Type of manifesto: Professional manifesto
Type of argument: Deductive argument
Conclusion: (2)
Premises: (1), (3), (4)
Start here:
1. Michael Schechter (1) “Reflective writing may help
students become better thinkers. (2) It helps students
realize that ideas are meant to be shared, tackled and
debated. (3) Bob and Jay found that students who did
weekly reflective journal writing about their course
content for a semester could already analyze course
concepts at a deeper level than those who didn’t. Stepcase
Lifehack’s newest contributor
2. Chel Diokno (1) “If given a chance to
make it to the senate, I will make laws that
will improve and speed up the justice
system of our country. For me, (2) lack of
transparency is one of the reasons why
justice is delayed and denied. (3) Under the
current system, it is very hard to secure
SALNs to investigate justices.”
3. BDO
Answer:YES
Type of Argument: Inductive Argument
Conclusion: The Philippines should be given priority for
the Corona Virus Disease (COVID) vaccine
Premise: Due to the increasing number of cases each
day
1. Standing up for Education.
(1) This manifesto is an attempt to indicate what
it means to speak educationally for education.
(2) We need to stand up for education. We need
to protect it [3) in order to respond to attacks
and challenges that aim to tie education either to
‘what is’ or to ‘what is not’, either to a present
that is already fully known or to a future that is
already fully determined but always deferred.
2. My Creed.
(1)“I must take my journey with its highs and
lows, joys and sorrows, love and hate, little
procrastination and more hardwork, and faith
and distrust (2)because it is then that when I face
my maker I went through it all and I conquer the
evil with good and be confident that He shall say,
job well done!”
3. A Manifesto for Slow Science In this bold new book,
(1) distinguished philosopher Isabelle Stengers shows that research is
deeply interconnected with broader social interests, which means that
(2) science cannot speedily race in isolation but must learn instead to
slow down. (3) Stengers offers a path to an alternative science, arguing
that researchers should stop seeing themselves as the 'thinking,
rational brain of humanity' and refuse to allow their expertise to be
used to shut down the concerns of the public, or to spread the belief
that scientific progress is inevitable and will resolve all of society's
problems. (4) Rather, science must engage openly and honestly with
an intelligent public and be clear about the kind of knowledge it is
capable of producing.
4. Spiderman “With
great power comes
great responsibility.”
5. Manifesto for the future of work and
organizational psychology. “We have
responsibilities towards individuals: As work
and organizational psychologists, we must
keep the wellbeing of individuals at heart
when doing our research and place it central
in our research questions, above and beyond
business interests.”