Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01/22/202
4
Over 50,000 hectares of Netafim's
drip irrigation equipment sold
annually for corn
01/22/202
4
Corn- A global crop
Distribution:
Latitude : 550 N (Canada and Russia) to 400 S (Argentina)
Altitude : 4200 m > MSL in Bolivia to 400 m < MSL in Dead sea, Israel
55° N
0°
40° S
01/22/202
4
Global production
01/22/202
4
A wide range of growing conditions
01/22/202
4
A wide range of growing conditions
• Grow well on wide type of soils (from the
South African sea sand to the Italian clay)
• Performs best on deep well drained
loams and silt loams having adequate
organic matter and available nutrients 120
100
60
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
01/22/202 Soil Salinity (ECe) (dS/m)
4
Main corn types
• Grain (Dent, Waxy) Corn
• Silage Corn (animal feeding,
energy)
• Sweet Corn
• Pop Corn
• Seed production Corn
Corn Physiology
1. Roots
2. Tiller
3. Leaves of the side branch forming husks
4. Rudimentary ears
5. Female inflorescence- Silk
6. Numerous styles forming the silks
7. A pair of young female spikelets and associated
cupule
8. A single style, called silk, with adhering pollen grains
9. Male inflorescence, Tassel
10. A pair of male spikelets with three anthers dangling
from the upper floret
01/22/202
4
Corn Physiology
Vegetative Stages Reproductive Stages
VE emergence R1 silking
01/22/202
4
Corn root system
Aggressive fibrous root system that can reach 2 and even 3 meters I case of a light and
deep soil.
The effective rootzone will concentrate on the top 40cm, especially under irrigated
conditions
01/22/202
4
Maturity groups and hybrid selection
Maturity groups have different kinds of classifications, FAO class, DAS, GDD, GDU, Days to
maturity, days to tasseling
The genetics must suit the growing condition, practice, irrigation, and the propose
(grain/silage)
Different maturity groups gives the option to reduce risks. Risk of heat waves during the
critical periods, late V stages and early Rs, risk of frost or rain prior to harvest and more
Quality parameters such as starch content, moisture content, sugars, amino acids becoming
an important parameters because it effects the quality of the feeding or the energy
production. Genetics have the biggest impact on the quality potential
grain grain
Type silage short silage medium silage long grain long Sweet short Sweet long remarks
short medium
01/22/202
4
Hybrid trial
DRYLAND DRIP
01/22/202
4
Hybrid trial
Variety
01/22/202
4
Hybrid trial What are the differences?
• More grains?
• Havier grains?
• Yield
More increase
cobs?
• Higher vegetative growth?
01/22/202
4
Sensitive stages
Maize appears relatively tolerant to water
deficits during the early V (up to 5) and late R,
R4-R6. periods
Greatest decrease in grain yields is caused by
water deficits (or waterlogging) during the VT-
R2 that will damage the pollination and will
lead to low grain number per cob (less on
each row)
Severe water deficits during the flowering
period, particularly at the time of silking and
pollination, may result in little or no grain yield
due to silk drying
Water deficit during the ripening period has
little effect on grain yield
01/22/202
4
Corn irrigation
Total water demands can get to 800mm per season and more
In rainy areas the average irrigation application will be about 150mm-350mm
01/22/202
4
Corn irrigation
01/22/202
4
Sensors for perfection
NETACAP
DELTA T – SM 150T
PROFILE PROBE
Soil moisture sensor for Multi-level soil moisture
both soilless and soil sensor for open field
applications in greenhouse applications. 6 different
and open field depths in a single sensor
NETBEAT WEATHER
IRROMETER
STATION
All-in-one weather Tension meter - soil
station with radiation, moisture sensing by
humidity, temperature, tension
wind and rain gauges
01/22/202
4
Sensors for perfection
Installation guidelines Thresholds
The sensors should posits in a location that
will represent the monitored are, Inside the
wetted zone, the active rootzone and In
several depths.
Take in consideration:
1. Dripline position (SDI, OS), install the
sensors 10-15cm away of the dripper.
2. Root zone depth and development
3. Soil structure and profile depth
https://youtu.be/IvqmuUJRFEA
01/22/202
4
Sensors for perfection
Corn irrigation models validation analysis
Treatment Treatment Treatment B - Treatment B -
date stage
A, mm A - events Water, mm events
18.8 A
15.4 B
Corn fertilization
01/22/202
4
Corn nutrients demand
Corn Yield N P2O5 K2O
Yield 25 % 5 75 26 70
Yield 50 % 9 150 52 139
Yield 75 % 14 225 78 209
Yield 100 % 18 299 104 278
Yield 125 % 23 375 130 348
Yield 150 % 27 449 156 417
Yield 175 % 32 525 182 487
Yield 200 % 36 599 208 557
700
600
500
400
kg/ha
300
200
100
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Yield (ton/ha)
N P2O5 K2O
01/22/202
4
n module - introduction
Corn fertilization program
Stage_Name Date Duration_Days N P2O5 K2O grN/day/du
Base_Dressing 0 97 59 106
GE 01/04/2018 7 0 0 0 0
VE-V7 08/04/2018 24 47 16.2 33 196
V8-V12 02/05/2018 13 51.2 9 33.7 394
V13-VT 15/05/2018 18 75.3 13.5 76.4 418
R1-R2 02/06/2018 18 27.7 6.3 28.9 154
R3-R6 20/06/2018 40 0 0 0 0
Total 120 298 104 278
350
300
250
150
100
45
50 97 106
59
0
N P2O5 K2O
Actual_Base_Dressing Actual_Fertilization
01/22/202
4
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: CORN FERTIGATION
INCREASED PRODUCTION BY 3.25 T/HA UNDER RAINY
CONDITIONS
Corn yield response to population, fertigation and irrigation
)^( Difference Fertigated Irrigated Population
---------------------Ton/ha------------------------ plants/Hectare
3.4T+ 15.2 11.8 80,000
3.4T+ 15.4 12 95,000
3.2T+ 15.5 12.3 110,000
3T+ 15.3 12.3 125,000
3.25T+ 15.35 12.1 Average
Due to sufficient rainfall, SDI was used primarily for fertigation rather than
irrigation during growth season
Values are averaged over five hybrids and six replications; all treatments were balanced for water supply, and
received a base application of 30kg-N/ha at planting
Fertigated areas significantly differed from irrigated areas at a probability level of 0.05
Research conducted by Prof. Fred Below, University of Illinois at Champaign, 2015
01/22/202
4
Irrigation & Fertigation protocol
Irrigation & Fertigation protocol
Optional drip irrigation systems for corn
8 Water meter
1 Pump
video on YouTube
01/22/202 4 Driprlines
4
Optional drip irrigation systems for corn
On surface systems SDI systems
1. Seasonal system 1. Full coverage system
2. Multi seasonal system 2. RTK precision practice
3. ECO SDI
On surface systems
SEASONAL SYSTEM
Single season recyclable dripperline
Flexible pipes for main and
submain
Common configuration: dripline per
two rows - 1.4m -1.92m, Flexnet as
submain
Life time: 10-15 years (excluding
laterals)
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Low initial investment cost Yearly laterals renewing
Low maintenance requirements Not suitable to all planting
High flexibility configurations
Not suitable to sloppy plots
On surface systems
MULTI SEASONAL SYSTEM
Medium-Thick walled multi seasonal
dripperlines.
Flexible or rigid main + submain pipes.
Common configuration: dripline per two
rows - 1.4m-1.92m.
Collected after seasonal use and stored till
following season.
Lifetime- Submain and laterals 5-10 years,
rest up to 25.
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Suitable to sloppy plots Requires maintenance.
(in case of PC).
Not suitable for all planting configurations.
Renew the laterals every
5-10 years. Labor intensive
High flexibility
SDI systems
GENERAL FEATURES
Recommended depth: 25cm-35cm.
System lifetime: 15-20 years.
Reduced tillage practice is recommended.
Optimal water and nutrient efficiency.
Ability to irrigate sloppy plots in case of PC.
Highly recommended to use monitoring and controlling.
Easy access to the field.
Reduce soil transpiration.
Reduce weed population.
Water distribution below the surface
01/22/202
4
SDI systems
FULL COVERAGE SYSTEM
Dripline spacing: 1 meter for most of the soils, 0.8-
09m in super sandy conditions.
ADVANTAGES
Low Operational cost, Zero labor requirements.
Suitable to all rotational crops.
Suitable to any planting configurations.
Precession practice is not a must.
DISADVANTAGES
Require high initial investment.
New users can find it complicated
SDI systems
RTK PRECISION PRACTICE
Dripline spacing: 1.4-1.9m, depend on the
planting configuration (one lateral per two rows)
Precession practice is highly recommended
ADVANTAGES
Suitable to all row crops
Require Lower initial investment
DISADVANTAGES
Can be problematic in some of the planting
configurations
Doesn't suit broadcast seeding crops such as
Alfalfa.
SDI systems SDI SOLUTIONS
ECO SDI
Dripline spacing: same as full-coverage or 1:2 configuration
Precession practice is highly recommended to simplify the
extraction
FXN as OS sub-main
No flashing
Possibility to reduce the thickness and the flow
ADVANTAGES
Optimal water and nutrients efficiency
Require Lower initial investment
Simple and fast installation (can be done by the farmer)
DISADVANTAGES
Required some annual installation
Can have a shorter longevity
Custom made solution
Watch SDI
Installation Watch SDI
video Installation video
01/22/202
4
Now we can offer the best-fit irrigation solution for our
customer’s specific requirements
Suitable for Don’t own Low Wish to Lack of Small Self- Fast Low
Alfalfa the land CAPEX experience man plots installation installation OPEX
growing availability with drip with power availability
cycle moderate
investment
48
Now we can offer the best-fit irrigation solution for our customer’s specific requirements
SDI
On-surface
ECO SDI
Suitable for Don’t own Low Wish to Lack of Small Self- Fast Low
Alfalfa the land CAPEX experience man plots installation installation OPEX
growing availability with drip with power availability
cycle moderate
investment
49
Optional drip irrigation systems for corn
System type Full coverage Precision ECO SDI On-surface FXN
SDI practice SDI
Recommended for
first-time user no no yes yes
Portability
no no partial complete
Plot size (ha)
>15 >15 0-200 0-200
Relative CAPEX
2.3x 2X 1.5x x
Relative OPEX
x X 0.2x 10x
System life time 15+ years for all 15+ years for • 20 years for all excluding • 20 years for all excluding
components all components dripperlines dripperlines and FXN
• 5-10 years for FXN • 5-10 years for FXN
• 7-15 years for Driplines- • 1-8 years for Driprline-
according to the type according to type
Maintenance is mandatory!
Sub-Surface Drip Irrigation
01/22/202
4
SDI Installation
01/22/202
4
SDI-E
Subsurface Drip Irrigation for
Dairy Effluent Water Application
Netafim’s solutions
1 2
4
SOLID / LIQUID
1 SEPARATION +
MICROFILTRATIO
2 TANK
3 NETAFIM SPINKLIN
DISK FILTRATION
TYPHOON PLUS
4 DRIPPERLINE
Netafim’s solutions
59
SDI
IRRIGATED
FIELD
DAIRY
FILTRATION
LAGOON 2
SOLID LAGOON 1
SEPARATOR
Alternatives
62
The negative impact
63
The negative impact
64
The negative impact
65
The negative impact
66
Alternatives
Operational
Cost (irri+ww,
Investment considering Possibility to
METHOD J F M A M J J A S O N D cost 50M3ww/Ha) Comments compete
GUNS 40,000€/50Ha 300€/Ha Low N efficiency High
(20%), dirty leaf,
limited timing, high
environmental effect
TANK No transit 35,000€ 200€/Ha Low efficiency, High
Relevant for 50- Not include limited timing, high
environmental
70Ha irrigation cost
effect
67
The benefits
01/22/202
4
Thank you for listening!
Questions?
01/22/202
4