Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STRATEGY
IMPLEMENTATION:
ORGANIZING AND
STRUCTURE
Strategy implementation
is the sum total of the activities and choices required for the execution of a strategic
plan. It is the process by which objectives, strategies, and policies are put into action
through the development of programs and tactics, budgets, and procedures.
Implementation should be evaluated as strategy is being formulated although many
companies separate the two. Implementation is the key part of strategic management
for without implementation we have nothing. Strategy formulation and strategy
implementation should be considered as two sides of the same coin.
Who Implement Strategy
Depending on how a corporation is organized, those who implement strategy will probably be a much
more diverse set of people than those who formulate it. From large, multi-industry corporations to small
entrepreneurial ventures, the reality is that the implementers of strategy are everyone in the
organization.
Vice presidents of functional areas and directors of divisions or strategic business units (SBUs) work
with their subordinates to put together large-scale implementation plans. Plant managers, project
managers, and unit heads put together plans for their specific plants, departments, and units. SaaS-based
company presidents work with their project managers and developers to meet the latest needs of their
customers
What must be done?
The managers of divisions and functional areas work with their fellow
managers to develop programs, budgets, and procedures for the
implementation of strategy. They also work to achieve synergy among
the divisions and functional areas in order to establish and maintain a
company’s distinctive competence.
Competitive Tactics
Procedures
the primary meansby which organizations accomplish much of
what they do.
Achieving Synergy
Stage I:
Simple Structure Stage I is typified by the entrepreneur or a small team, who
founds a company to promote an idea (a product or a service).
Stage II: Functional Structure Stage II is the point at which the entrepreneur
is replaced by a team of managers who have functional specializations. The
transition to this stage requires a substantial managerial style change for the
chief officer of the company, especially if he or she was the Stage I
entrepreneur.
Stages of corporate development
Stage III:
Divisional Structure Stage III is typified by the corporation’s managing diverse product lines
in numerous industries; it decentralizes the decision-making authority. Stage III organizations
grow by diversifying their product lines and expanding to cover wider geographical areas.
Stage IV:
Beyond SBUs Even with the evolution into SBUs during the 1970s and 1980s, the divisional
structure is not the last word in organization structure. The use of SBUs may result in a red
tape crisis in which the corporation has grown too large and complex to be managed through
formal programs and rigid systems, and procedures take precedence over problem solving
Organizational life cycle
2. Product/brand management
3. Mature matrix
Two Forms of Flexible Types of Organizational
Structure
REENGINEERING
Is a commonly defined as the redesigned of business processes and the
associated system and organizational structures to achieved a dramatic
improvement in business performance.
Is the reorganizing and modifying existing software system to make
them more maintainable.
is the radical redesign of business processes to achieve major gains in
cost, service, or time.
MICHAEL HAMMER PRINCIPLES FOR
REENGINEERING
Organizing a company’s activities and people to implement strategy more than simply redesigning a
corporation’s overall structure.it also involves redesigning the way jobs are done.
Job design refers to the study of individual tasks in attempt to make them more relevant to the company and
to the employee(s).
concerned with changing, modifying and enriching jobs in order to capture the talents of employees while
improving organizations performance.