Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Historical Controversies
Historical Controversies
Philippine History
Controversies and
Conflicting Views in
Philippine
History
Prepared By:
MOLINA
ZAFRA
ZAIDE
ALIP
a sprawling
lies 700 miles or archipelago fringing
1126 km to the the southeastern rim
southeast of the Asian
of the Asia Continent.
mainland.
Location of the Philippine Deep
Cagayan River or
Rio Grande de Cagayan
Longest river in the world
MOLINA Benitez
ALIP
Zaide
google
It is naturally
formed, narrow but
navigable waterway
that connects two
larger bodies of
Molina – There are 8 land lock straits in the
Philippines water.
Agoncillo – There are 20 land lock straits.
Zaide – There are 8 land lock straits.
Google – There are 22 straits.
Straits
It is naturally
formed, narrow but
navigable waterway
that connects two
larger bodies of
Molina – There are 8 land lock straits in the
Philippines water.
Agoncillo – There are 20 land lock straits.
Zaide – There are 8 land lock straits.
Google – There are 22 straits.
Straits
It is naturally
formed, narrow but
navigable waterway
that connects two
larger bodies of
Molina – There are 8 land lock straits in the
Philippines water.
Agoncillo – There are 20 land lock straits.
Zaide – There are 8 land lock straits.
Google – There are 22 straits.
Straits
It is naturally
formed, narrow but
navigable waterway
that connects two
larger bodies of
Molina – There are 8 land lock straits in the
Philippines water.
Agoncillo – There are 20 land lock straits.
Zaide – There are 8 land lock straits.
Google – There are 22 straits.
Coastline
also called seashore where land meets the sea or
ocean
a line that forms the boundary between the
land and the ocean, sea, or lake
coastline
zaide
molina
i ppi ne s c o a s t li ne
The Phil is
c o a s t li ne
is thrice longer The Phi l i pp ine s
n t he U . S. c o a s t li n e nearly
tha
with 10,850 statute 11,446 statute miles.
miles.
Mount Pulag or sometimes called Mount Pulog
an explanation or
establishment of the meaning
or significance of something
that happened in the past
CONTEXT ANALYSIS
(a) the historical context of the
source
(b) the author’s background,
intent and
authority on the subject
(c) the source’s relevance and
SITE OF THE
FIRST MASS
Where did the first Catholic
Mass take place in the
Philippines?
March 31, 1521 (Easter
Sunday)
First Catholic mass in
the Philippines
Pedro de Valderrama
PRIMARY SOURCE
The First Voyage Around the
World, translated from the
accounts of Antonio Pigafetta
accompanied by original
documents, with notes and an
introduction by Lord Stanley of
Alderley.
ANTONIO PIGAFETTA
the principal chronicler of the
Magellan-Elcano expedition that
became the first to circumnavigate
the globe in 1519–1522.
An Italian scholar-turned explorer,
Pigafetta was among the 18 crew
members who survived the journey
and returned to Spain aboard the
nao Victoria, then led by Juan
Sebastián Elcano, on Sept. 6, 1522
(at Sanlúcar de Barrameda).
ANTONIO PIGAFETTA
Pigafetta’s journal is the
source of most our knowledge
of the Magellan-Elcano
expedition, as well as the
discovery of the Strait of
Magellan, that first crossing
of the Pacific Ocean, and the
“discovery” of the
Philippines.
MAIN ISSUE
=
Mazaua with a circumference of 3-4
leguas (9-12 nautical miles) has an
area of from 2,213 to 3,930 hectares
AMBROSIANA CODEX
The Limasawa hypothesis asserts the Leyte isle
is the equal of Magellan’s port, Mazaua. That
is, they are identical: perfect, exact, total equal
of one another. In terms of size Limasawa’s 698
hectares ill fit Mazaua’s area of 2213 to 3930
hectares converted from Ginés de Mafra’s
estimate of its 3-4 leguas circumference, A list of
32 Mazaua properties shows in no instance do
the two coincide.
YALE CODEX
Map of “Cap. de Gatighan”
with Mazaua at top right hand
corner. Orientation is south-
north against today’s north-
south convention. Mazaua’s
location is southeast of Bohol.
Note isle sandwiched between
Ceilon (Panaón) and Bohol.
YALE CODEX
In today’s map this isle is
identified as Limasawa. By
wrongly classifying Ceilon as
Leyte historians have
misappreciated the tracks
drawn by Pigafetta and Albo.
R.A. Skelton, Donald F. Lach,
and Theodore J. Cachey have
correctly identified it as Panaón.
This map is taken from the
Mario Pozzi edition of the
Ambrosiana.
YALE CODEX
N VS. I
I P
S I
H N
O
“Spanish Version of the Cavite Mutiny of 1872” in Gregorio Zaide and Sonia Zaide,
Documentary Sources of Philippine History, Volume 7 (Manila: NationalBook Store, 1990),
269-273.
The abolition of privileges enjoyed by the laborers of the Cavite arsenal of exemption from the
tribute was, according to some, the cause of the insurrection. There were, however, other
causes. The Spanish revolution which overthrew a secular throne; the propaganda carried on
by an unbridled press against monarchical principles, attentatory [sic] of the most sacred
respects towards the dethroned majesty; the democratic and republican books
and pamphlets; the speeches and preachings of the apostles of these new ideas
in Spain; the outbursts of the American publicists and the criminal policy of the senseless
Governor whom the Revolutionary government sent to govern the Philippines, and who
put into practice these ideas were the determining circumstances which gave rise, among
certain Filipinos, to the idea of attaining their independence. It was towards this goal
that they started to work, with the powerful assistance of a certain section of the
native clergy, who out of spite towards friars, made common cause with the enemies of the
mother country. At various times but especially in the beginning of year 1872, the authorities
received anonymous communication with the information that a great uprising would break out
against the Spaniards, the minute the fleet at Cavite left for the South, and that all would be
assassinated,conspiracy had been going on since the days of La Torre with utmost secrecy. At
times, theprincipal leaders met either in the house of Filipino Spaniard, D. Joaquin Pardo de
Tavera, or in that of the native curate of Bacoor, the soul of the movement, whose energetic
character and immense wealth enabled him to exercise a strong influence.
SPANISH PERSPECTIVE
PRIMARY SOURCES: EXCERPTS FROM THE OFFICIAL REPOST OF GOVERNOR
IZQUIERDO ON THE CAVITE MUTINY OF 1872
( Source: Rafael Izquirdo )
“Official Report on the Cavite Mutiny,” in Gregorio Zaide and SoniaZaide, Documentary Sources
of Philippine History, Volume 7 (Manila: National Book Store,1990), 281-286.
It seems definite that the insurrection was motivated and prepared by the native clergy, by the
mestizos and native lawyers, and by those known here as abogadillos. The instigators, to
carry out their criminal project, protested against the injustice of the government
in not paying the provinces for their tobacco crop, and against the usury that some practice in
documents that the Finance department gives crop owners who have to sell them at aloss. They
encouraged the rebellion by pretesting what they called the injustice of having obliged the
workers in the Cavite arsenal to pay tribute starting January 1 and render personal service, from
which they were formerly exempted. Up to now it has not been clearly determined if they
planned to establish a monarchy or a republic, because the Indios have no word in their
language to describe this different form of government, whose head in Filipino would be called
hari; but it turns out that they would place at the head of the government a priest that the head
selected would be D. Jose Burgos, or D. Jacinto Zamora. Such is the plan of the rebels, those
who guided them, and the means they counted upon for its realization. It is apparent that the
accounts underscore the reason for the “revolution”: the abolition of privileges enjoyed by the
workers of the Cavite arsenal such as exemption from the payment oftribute and being
employed in polos y servicios, or force labor. They also identified other reasons which seemingly
made the issue a lot more serious, which include the presence of the native clergy, who, out
of spite against the Spanish friars, “conspired and supported” the rebels.
FILIPINO PERSPECTIVE
Tavera is of the opinion that the Spanish friars and Izquierdo
used the Cavite Mutiny as a way to address other issues by
blowing out of proportion the isolated mutiny attempt (Charity,
2020). During this time, the Central Government in Madrid was
planning to deprive the friars of all the powers of intervention in
matters of civil government and direction and management of
educational institutions. The friars needed something to justify
their continuing dominance in the country, and the mutiny
provided such Opportunity. However, the Central Spanish
Government introduced an educational decree fusing sectarian
schools run by the friars into a school called the Philippine
Institute. The decree aimed to improve the standard of education
in the Philippines by requiring teaching positions in these schools
to be filled by competitive examinations, an improvement
welcomed by most Filipinos. Another account, this time by
French writer Edmund Plauchut complemented Tavera's account
and analyzed the motivations of the 1872 Cavite Mutiny
FILIPINO PERSPECTIVE
PRIMARY SOURCE: EXCERPTS FROM PLAUCHUT’S ACCOUNT OF THE CAVITE MUTINY
(Source: Edmund Plauchut)
“The Cavite Mutiny of 1872 and the Martyrdom of Gom-Bur-Za,” in the Gregorio Zaide and Sonia Zaide , Documentary
Sources of Philippine History, Volume 7 (Manila: National Book Store, 1990), 251-268.
General La Torre created a junta composed of high officials including some friars and six Spanish officials. At the same
time there was created by the government in Madrid a committee to investigate the same problems submitted to the
Manila committee. When the two finished work, it was found that they came to the same conclusions. Here is the
summary of the reforms they considered necessary to introduced:
Changes in tariff rates at customs, and the methods of collection.
Removal of surcharges on foreign importations.
Reduction of export fees.
Permission for foreigners to reside in the Philippines, buy real state, enjoy freedom of worship,
and operate commercial transports flying the Spanish flag.
Establishment of an advisory council to inform the Minister of Overseas Affairs in Madrid on
the necessary reforms to be implemented.
Changes in primary and secondary education.
Establishment of an Institute of Civil Administration in the Philippines, rendering unnecessary
the sending home of short-term civil officials every time there is a change of ministry.
Study of direct-tax system.
Abolition of the tobacco monopoly.
In an article published by the National Historical Commission of
the Philippines in 2012, these four primary sources have been
considered and some basic suggested the following unvarying facts:
2) Gen. Izquierdo introduced rigid and strict policies that made the
Filipinos move and turn away from Spanish government out of
disgust;
GOMBURZA were
executed
Spanish government
Frailocracia
El Filibusterismo
THE
PHILIPPINE
NATIONAL
FLAG
GEN. EMILIO AGUINALDO
made the sketch of the
flag
aspired to establish a
new nation to be
signified by a flag and
an anthem during the
second phase of the
Philippine Revolution
Senate Bill No. 1
Flag Law of 1907
Sen. Rafael Palma
the one which was
"consecrated and
honored by the people"
and the change of its
color or shade is a
violation of law.
Executive Order No. 1010
On 25 February 1985
President Ferdinand Marcos
changed dark blue to a lighter
shade, lighter than navy blue but
darker than sky blue or azure
which is the basis of the true
shade of the blue in the Philippine
flag.
Inclusion of a 9th Ray or
Crescent in the Flag
House Bill No. 7725
Rep. Sultan Omar
Dianalan
first District of Lanao del
Sur
9th ray
Muslims and the cultural
minorities who fought the
Spaniards and waged war
against them
Teodoro
Agoncillo
eight provinces
which rose in
arms against
Spain during the
Philippine
The Blue Color of the
Flag
Aguinaldo
neither azul oscuro
nor azul marino
"bughaw"
Juan Luna
"Monograph"
May 21, 1899
CHINA BLUE