Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.Types of Cycles
Monoprop engines open the valve from the propellant tank to the engine, while
maintaining the pressure inside the propellant tank. They also modulate another valve
between the high-pressure tank and the propellant tank.
The difference to monoprop engines is that these engines can use more energetic and
efficient propellants. Examples of such are RP-1 and LOx, or even CH4 and LOx.
A problem here is the overall pressure in the system, meaning that the pressurant tanks are
still the limiting factor. This is similar to what we saw with with cold gas thrusters and
monopropellant pressure-fed engines. There is a trade-off where increasing pressure in the
system increases weight. Too much additional weight ends up taking away more payload
capacity than the increase in performance would add to it.
Instead of passing all this exhaust from the gas generator to the combustion chamber, we
need to make some changes. The first change is that, instead of using a small amount of
fuel and oxidizer to power the gas generator, the engine will pump either ALL of the fuel
or the oxidizer through the gas generator and over the turbine.
Propellant passes completely through the preburner and past the turbine, which defines the
type of closed cycle design. In other words, the design is either fuel-rich or oxidizer-rich.
In order to get around this issue, engineers will sometimes arrange to dilute the tap-off gas
before it reaches the turbine. They usually do this by adding in some fuel that helps to
reduce the temperature by making the exhaust more fuel-rich. This is similar to how a
typical gas generator functions.
2.Types of Cycles
Monoprop engines open the valve from the propellant tank to the engine, while
maintaining the pressure inside the propellant tank. They also modulate another valve
between the high-pressure tank and the propellant tank.
The difference to monoprop engines is that these engines can use more energetic and
efficient propellants. Examples of such are RP-1 and LOx, or even CH4 and LOx.
A problem here is the overall pressure in the system, meaning that the pressurant tanks are
still the limiting factor. This is similar to what we saw with with cold gas thrusters and
monopropellant pressure-fed engines. There is a trade-off where increasing pressure in the
system increases weight. Too much additional weight ends up taking away more payload
capacity than the increase in performance would add to it.
Instead of passing all this exhaust from the gas generator to the combustion chamber, we
need to make some changes. The first change is that, instead of using a small amount of
fuel and oxidizer to power the gas generator, the engine will pump either ALL of the fuel
or the oxidizer through the gas generator and over the turbine.
Propellant passes completely through the preburner and past the turbine, which defines the
type of closed cycle design. In other words, the design is either fuel-rich or oxidizer-rich.
In order to get around this issue, engineers will sometimes arrange to dilute the tap-off gas
before it reaches the turbine. They usually do this by adding in some fuel that helps to
reduce the temperature by making the exhaust more fuel-rich. This is similar to how a
typical gas generator functions.