You are on page 1of 25

DISTRICT OF

SAN JOAQUIN
SOUTH
Fourth Quarter
KPI
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (as
of December 31, 2018)

ACCESS No. of Learners %


Enrolment 3208
Dropout 9 0.28%
PARDO 5 0.16%

QUALITY 2789 (excluding kinder)

Non-Numerates 183 6%
Non-Readers 89 3.1%
With Failing Grades 10 0.31%
THIRD QUARTER KPI FOURTH QUARTER KPI
ACCESS TOTAL
ENROLLMENT 3195 ACCESS TOTAL
DROP OUT 2
PARDO 28
ENROLLMENT 3208
QUALITY
NON - NUMERATES 492
NO. OF LEARNERS WITH FAILING GRADES 22
NUMBER OF DROP OUT 9
NO. OF NON- READERS 90
GOVERNANCE
MOOE 21 NUMBER OF PARDO 5
SBM LEVELOF PRACTICE
LEVEL I 12
LEVEL II 9 QUALITY TOTAL
LEVEL III 0
CANTEEN REPORTS
NUMBER OF NON - NUMERATES 183
SCHOOL MANAGE 3
TEACHER MANAGE 0
COOP MANAGE 0 NUMBER OF LEARNERS WITH
10
CONSIGNMENT ONLY 20 FAILING GRADES
WITHOUT CANTEEN 1
WITH FINANCIAL REPORTS 20 NUMBER OF NON - READERS 89
WITHOUT FINANCIAL REPORTS 0
Priority Improvement
Area
Quality
Non - readers
NAME OF DROP
A
ENROLMENT % PARDO %
SCHOOL OUT
Amboyu-an ES 144 0 0% 2 1.39%
Andres Bonifacio ES 119 0 0% 0 0%

C
Balabago ES 172 0 0% 0 0%
Camia ES 91 0 0% 0 0%
Dacdacanan ES 73 0 0% 0 0%
Escalantera ES 150 0 0% 0 0%

C
Igbangcal ES 91 0 0% 0 0%
Igcadlum PS 63 1 1.59% 1 1.59%
Igcaratong ES 152 1 0.66 % 0 0%
Igcores ES 139 0 0% 0 0%

E Lawigan ES
Lopez-Vito PS
Marcelo Serag MS
Montinola ES
360
52
115
78
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
00
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%

S Pitogo ES
San Luis ES
Sinogbuhan ES
Talagutac ES
354
94
220
88
4
1
0
0
1.13%
1.06%
0%
0%
2
0
0
0
0.56%
0%
0%
0%

S San Joaquin South CES


Toog-Tiglawa ES
Valverde ES
272
169
212
0
0
2
0%
0%
0.94%
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
SEGMENTATION
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(as of December 31, 2018)

ACCESS No. of Learners %


Enrolment 3208
Dropout 9 0.28%
PARDO 5 0.16%
QUALITY 2789 (excluding kinder)
Non-Numerates 183 6%
Non-Readers 89 3.1%
With Failing Grades 10 0.31%
NON- NON- FAILING

Q
NAME OF SCHOOL % % %
READERS NUMERATES GRADES
Amboyu-an ES 2 2.25 % 9 6.25 3 2.1%
Andres Bonifacio ES 4 19 15.97 0 0.0

U
4.49 %
Balabago ES 0 0.00 % 3 1.74 0 0.0
Camia ES 5 5.62 % 5 5.49 2 2.2%
Dacdacanan ES 2 2.25 % 2 2.74 0 0.0

A Escalantera ES
Igbangcal ES
Igcadlum PS
5
4
10
5.62 %
4.49 %
11..24 %
7
5
8
4.67
5.49
12.70
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0

L Igcaratong ES
Igcores ES
Lawigan ES
4
10
1
4.49 %
11.24 %
1.12 %
13
20
6
8.55
14.39
1.67
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0

I
Lopez-Vito PS 1 1.12 % 2 3.85 0 0.0
Marcelo Serag MS 0 0.00 % 12 10.43 0 0.0
Montinola ES 1 1.12 % 3 3.85 0 0.0
Pitogo ES 8 23 6.50 2 0.6

T
8.99 %
San Luis ES 0 0.00 % 0 0.00 0 0.0
Sinogbuhan ES 6 6,74 % 20 9.09 0 0.0
Talagutac ES 4 4.49 % 5 5.68 0 0.0

Y San Joaquin South CES


Toog-Tiglawa ES
Valverde ES
4
15
4
4.49 %
16.85 %
4.49 %
1
22
4
0.44
13.02
1.89
0
0
3
0.0
0.0
1.4%
NAME OF SCHOOL MALE FEMALE TOTAL
Amboyu-an ES 2 1 3

QUALITY Andres Bonifacio ES


Balabago ES
Camia ES
3
0
5
1
0
0
4
0
5
Dacdacanan ES 2 0 2

SCHOOLS WITH Escalantera ES


Igabangcal ES
3
4
2
1
5
5
HIGHEST Igcadlum PS 8 2 10
Igcaratong ES 3 1 4
NUMBER OF Igcores ES 7 3 10
Lawigan ES 0 0 0
NON – Lopez-Vito PS 0 1 1
Marcelo Serag MS 0 1 1
READERS Montinola ES 1 6 7
 Toog–Tiglawa ES Pitogo ES 6 2 8
San Luis ES 0 0 0
 Igcadlum PS Sinogbuhan ES 6 0 6

 Igcores ES Talagutac ES
San Joaquin South CES
3
3
1
1
4
4
Toog- Tiglawa ES 11 4 15
Valverde ES 3 1 4
GRAND TOTAL 70 19 89
NON - READERS
7
6
6

5
4 4
4 TOOG-TIGLAWA ES
3 3 3 3 IGCORES ES
3 IGCADLUM ES
2 2
2
1 1 1 1 1
1
0 0 0 0
0
GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6
TOOG –TIGLAWA DATA OF NON – READERS BY GRADE LEVEL
6
6

5
MALE
5
PERCENTAGE

4
FEMALE
3 3
PERCENTAGE2
3

2 2 2 TOTAL
2
PERCENTAGE3
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
33.33% 25.00% 22.22%12.50%17.64% 14.28%11.11%13.04%
11.11% 5.26% 6.25% 5.71% 6.25%00.00% 3.84%
00.00%00.00%00.00%
0
GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6
NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY GRADE LEVEL AND GENDER
IGCORES ES IGCADLUM PS TOOG –TIGLAWA ES

GRADE
LEVEL M % F % T % M % F % T % M % F % T %

GRADE 1 2 33.33 1 10 3 18.75 3 30 1 16.66 4 25 5 33.33 1 11.11 6 25

GRADE 2 2 13.33 1 14.28 3 13.63 4 66.6 0 0 4 50 2 22.22 1 12.5 3 17.64

GRADE 3 1 14.28 0 0 1 6.66 1 25 1 9.09 2 13 2 14.28 1 11.11 3 13.04

GRADE 4 1 5.88 0 0 1 4.34 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5.26 1 6.25 2 5.71

GRADE 5 0 0 1 14.28 1 4.16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GRADE 6 1 7.69 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6.25 0 0 1 3.84


CHARACTERIZATION
LEARNERS
 The pupils who were assessed as non-readers were always absent.
 Parents were sending their children to the farm for agricultural work.
 Due to increasing absences and decreasing contact time, learners were
unable to read.
 Learners lost their love for reading and learning due to playing games in
cellphone.
 Distance from home to school ( 3-5 kms. from home to school.)
 Negative attitude towards education due to economic status and
educational attainment of the parents.
TEACHERS
 Teachers took most of their time accomplishing reports and paper
works.
 Contact time has been decreased due to extra curricular activities of
teachers and learners.( Sports, Cultural .Scouting & etc.
 One Teacher is handling multi - grade classes.( Grades 1 & 2)
 Teachers use traditional method of teaching( chalk talk method) that
do not encourage the interest of the learners.
 Teachers in grades 1to 3 need to undergo seminar in remedial
reading.
MATERIALS, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT
 Need more reading materials ( Grades 1-3 )
 Insufficient supply of reading materials in the library
 Mini LRC is not functional(To-og Tiglawa ES,Igcadlum PS,
Igcores ES)
ICT ENVIRONMENT
 No internet access
 Few teachers are well versed in using computers and laptops
ASSESSMENT
 Need Unified Reading Assessment Tool to find out non-
readers.
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT
 Less supervision of school head due to priority in preparation
of reports, liquidation of MOOE, SBFP and other related
works with other agencies.
COMMUNITY, INDUSTRY RELEVANCE AND
PARNTERSHIP
 Limited financial support from the people in the community
and other stakeholders due to their economic status.
INTERVENTIONS
 Encourage School Heads and Teachers for Home Visitations.
 Capacitate School Heads for Technical Assistance in the
implementation of their projects in order to solve their non-readers.
 Advise School Heads to tap the NGO ( Child Initiative ) for financial
assistance to be given to non-readers for instructional materials.
 Intensify school visitations to schools with high number of non-
readers.
 Recommend grades1-3 teachers to attend seminars in district,
division and regional training in remedial reading.
THANK YOU! 
MOV’S

Conducted Technical Assistance in Toog – Tiglawa ES and Pitogo ES


Conducted reading
assessment to all
schools last November
19 to December 4,
2018for the Forth
Quarter DMEA

MOV’S

You might also like