•

I
o
Uji Kolmogorov Smirnov $

$$$ • $ o " • • •• • S W
·,
'·
$ Anggota:
e t $

·} y,
«"j'j
Akoska
pratama (
W,' , '· i
i
i i's
10121001

··' ;'
$
'« 026 )
Anna
Sulist ia( 10121001061 )
Hedy Trijaya Meilinda
Wulandar
Nining Eka Susanti ' '
i ( 10121001062 )
Afria Tantri ( (10121001065
1012100 ) Tetti H
1055 )
H ( 10121001066)
Anit a
Dina Novianti S. ( 10121001068 )
Ruliantini
Juita E Sijabat ( 10121001082 )
( 101210
Bibah Novrita01059 )
( 10121001084 )
WuriRafikaJayanti(10121001060)
Handayani Eldi ( 10121001088
)
 Kolmogorov Smirnov

Mengapa pakai uji kolmogorov smirnov ??

Syarat chi-square ;
1.Tidak ada sel yang nilai observed yang bernilai 0
2.Sel yang mempunyai nilai expected < 5, maks 20% dri jumlah
sel
3.Nilai yg di ambil cont inut it y correct ion ut k tabel 2x2, tabel
2xk
nilai pearson chi-square
Maka:
Uji kolmogorov di pakai sebagai alternatif apabila uji chi-square
tidak terpenuhi dan menggunakan tabel 2 x k
 NO JENIS KELAMIN DEPRESI
1 2 3
2 1 3
3 2 3 18 2 3

4 1 3 19 2 3

5 1 3 20 1 2

6 2 3 21 2 2

7 2 3 22 2 3

8 1 3 23 2 3

9 1 3 24 1 2

10 2 3 25 1 3
11 1 3 26 1 3

12 1 1 2 3

13 1 3 2 3

14 1 2 2 1

15 1 2 2 3

Tabel contoh soal

 Menggunakan uji kolmogorov jika chi-
square tidak terpenuhi
Contoh Chi-square •
•
«st8S
e
ate1 [0ta5et0] - 1BM SPSS SiatistisData £it
Ell Edit View Data
Transform

Name
Type
nomor Numer
Analyze Direct!Mar etng
Window Help
Reports
Desiptve Statistics
Taples
CompareMeans
graphs

[£euenaes
[ pesaes
[ lit es

m a 5 5 = t @@ %
Non
I
Add-pns

8 Right
we a
Scale input
e
jeniskelami ic General
4 Eplore e Right 6 Nominal Input lccsl
n Nume cosstss Non
Linear Model Right 6 Input
depresi nc
Numer
Generalized EE Raw
e
Non Nominal
t Crosstab:
Linear ModelsMoyed le P e t s
ic e
Row(s):
Models
@lgoPot s
9 ( eaa.
Correlate
I
·l
nomor
Regressi
on
J
~ j eniskelamin stashes..]
Lpginear
NeuralNetworks
Column(s):
( ea.
Classify
Dimension Reduction sl 1 ~ r e s i
J
Scale
Nonparametric Tests Layer 1 of1 (roma.J
Forecasting aootstap./
Survival
Multiple Response
E Missing Value
Analysis
Multiple Imputation
Complex Samples
Quality Control
E Display layer varables in table layers

@Roc [ l Display clustered bar charts

cure [] suppress tables

taxJ ea.J au eel es

ye sPss s t a t i s t i c s Processoris r e a y T ( ( ]
Cro»stab d Crosstabs: Statistics

¢ nomor
sae. [ f chit-square j [ I correlations
¢
eniskelamin [40rrin3] Ordinal
J
& depresi
G ['~m,, , (saus»es]
romau. [ ] Contingency coefficient [] Gamma

Lees.)
sos».) [ ] Phi and Cramers v [] Somers' d
J [ ] Lambda [ l Kendall's tau-b
Lay@ff1,
[ l uncertainty coefficient [] Kendall's tau-c

[Nominal by Interval [] Kappa

L Ela [ I Risk
[] McNemar
"Lysplay(hstgrelr
■ ]
[ suppresss, N Crosstabs: Cell [l] Cochran's and Mantel-Haenszel statistics
Test common odds ratio equals: 1
Display [ f f }

C u l t s [] Compare column proportions [contnu]J[ cancel[ Help J

M Observed [] +dust p-values (Bonferroni [ Crosstabs
method)
l Expected
[ Hide small counts ¢ nomor
Less than ¢
jeniskelamin
G
5
PercentageS Residuals
9 depresi
[] Unstandardized Format..
(soot
[ Standardized
[ l Adjusted standardized
[~,...,.,,
Lay@ff} , s.)

Q Round case weights

@ Truncate cell Q Truncate case
counts weights
O No adjustments o s o t n table layers
(cs.])[ caa[_ a ) Display clustered par
charts
[ suppress tables
ass cael(nae)
 e @output
08co Case Processing Summary
o
a {@
I Cases
Gd Notes I Valid Missing Total
c
n u LebsActive Dataset
ros+
t a
Lg case jeniskelamin depresi
I
I
N
30
Percent N
0
Percen
t 0.0%
N
30
Percen
t
Processing 10 0.0% 100.0%
· Li I
g jeniske
oo lami n de jeniskelarin ' depresi Crosstabulation
Li ch+-Square
a {@ crosstas
+@.nue depresi
Tests
ea Notes clinical range bo,rder norm Total
· LE Act»we jeniskelami Count line al 14
Dataset n Expected Count 9 14.0
Li case Processing % within 10.7 100.0
· Li e niskelamin perempua jeniskelamin 64.3% %
]
de 16
n Count 14
Lg cn+-Square Tests
Expected Count 16.0
0Loo 12.3
a { ••@
c r o s snt aNbus % within 87.5% 100.0
Total 2
jeniskelamin %
• L[Ac t»we Dataset
oetes 2.0
Lij case Processing Count
6.7%
30
+ gLjeniskelamin de Expected Count 30.0
Lg chi-square Tests % within jeniskelamin 100.0
%
Chi-square
Tests
df
Asymp. Ada 4 sel ( 66,7
Value Sig.
Pearson
Ch+Square
2.766
2.890
2
2
(2-sided)
.251
%) mempunyai
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
1.222 1 236
expected
Association
N of Valid Cases
30 count
a. 4cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5.
The
minimum expected countis ,93
< 5.
 I nterpretasi

Syarat Chi-Square tidak terpenuhi karena

mempunyai nilai expect ed <5 ada 66, 7% dari
jum lah selur uh sel

•
Maka dari itu,uji yang dipakai adalah uji
alternatifnya, yaitu uji KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV
 Contoh Kolmogorov •
•
"Untitled! [De:Se0d,- 1BM $95$ utties
Det

Name
Reports
DesapteStatstcs
Taes
8#23 J
%3
Value Missing Cou
lm Ng
% Measur
d Two-Independent-Samples Tests l r
Typ el
s ns e Test Variable List [ J
% .
nomor e
niskel
Numenc
CMpaneeans
@era Unear Model
None
(1 bolo- None
No ne Rg
3 Rgt
¢ sale
8
\
\ 9 nomor se
Numenci hl] \ [otons.)]
min GeneralgedLinear
None 3 Rt meal
depresi Numen¢ lodels
(1. clinical
ml
t
hayed lodels
Corell
Reressio Grouping Variable:
n ]jeniskelamin(? ?)
Lg#near
10 Define Groups...
NeuralNetworts
11 0asst ] T ] f a
12
13
pimensin Redutn
$at Age9we [i Mann-whitney u [ Koimogorov-smirnov z
14
oopawmetnc f n
i dependent [] Moses extreme reactions [ Wald-Wolfowitz runs
15 Sampe ls
Tests Forecast0
16
I
$Mal
I Related Samples
- - -0ls- - - 1 g wu n
- - [eaoy
Cs east
18
lMutpie Response
[ issm ve abyss
[ewmaw [Reset/[ c anceyl [ H elp )
19 .8»
20
utpie mptaton @us [i d Two independent Samples:...
~ Comp)le1Samples
2nepenentsamples
22
23
Quality Control

@Roc
[yoeentsamples
[2Reed Samples
rur1 L1
2u
2
ca
ij «Ree $es
Group2 [ 2
+ (coos.J[ cancer el» J
Data
View [
g @ o ut
a.4ells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5.
0 u The
a@crasstas
@re minimum erected count is.93
( wets
L[A c
Dataset
l.l case
Prosing
us
Lj enisielamin de
E@crosstas
lg Chi-Square NPar Tests
t Tests
1e
[ wets
l[Awe Dataset
L.lj case
Lj eniselamin '
Prossing Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test NILAI SIGNIFICANCY MENUNJUKKAN
ll chi-Squwe Tests
os ANG KA 0,816 KARENA p > 0,05,
e@ c
· nassetats Frequencies

isniskelamin 1 I
MAKA
@wees depresi 1a-alt 1 14 DAPAT DIAMBIL KESIMPULAN
L[Ace Dataset perempua 16 BAHWA
l Case n 30
Total ADANYA BUKTI YANG LEMAH UNTUK
»PrLge s sing
niskelamin' d e Test statistics MENOLAK HIPOTESA NOL " TIDAK
L.&j Ct+-Sure
e ADA
e ates
Tests
Most Etreme Absolut
depresi
I&Ache Dataset Differences e
232
000
HUBUNGAN ANTARA JENIS

·
@Two-sampie
ma
Kotr Positive - KELAMIN
Lg Negativ 232
@ wa
Frequencies
Kolmagoro+-$miror2
e
63
DENGAN DEPRESIY.
symp. Sig. 2tailed
1ests a t e a 6ruping Vanable: 4 KESIM PULANNVAJENIS KELAMIN
81
jenishe±min
6
TIDAK
BERHUBUNGAN SECARA
r tests SIGNIFICANT
 Keunggulan Uji Kolmogorov-Smirnov
dibandingkan Uji Chi-Square
1. CS memerlukan data yang terkelompokkan,
KS tidak memerlukannya
2. CS t idak bisa untuk sampel kecil, sementara
KS bisa
3. Oleh karena data CS adalah bersifat kategorik
maka ada data yang terbuang maknanya
4. KS lebih fleksibel dibandingkan CS

o 1 2 3 4
tumTS
5
rac tum u r s umYS u T S « u s
L I T T L E L I T T L E E V E N w vO L w M O S T
Thank You@ "