Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 A Introduction To Interpretation of Statutes
01 A Introduction To Interpretation of Statutes
IoS 04/02/2024
2
Learning Objectives
IoS 04/02/2024
3
Need for Interpretation ?
Enacted laws, specially the modern Acts and Rules, are drafted by legal
experts and it could be expected that the language used will leave little room
for interpretation or construction.
But the experience of all those, who have to bear and share the task of
application of the law, has been different.
IoS 04/02/2024
4
IoS 04/02/2024
5
English poet often regarded as the chief
representative of the Victorian age in poetry.
(1809-1892)
2014
IoS 04/02/2024
6
IoS 04/02/2024
7
Words….
IoS 04/02/2024
8
Words and Phrases
TABLE
IoS 04/02/2024
9
Words and Phrases ……
Interpretation of ‘words…’
IoS 04/02/2024
10
IoS 04/02/2024
11
What is Interpretation?
IoS 04/02/2024
12
Salmond
IoS 04/02/2024
13
Meaning of Interpretation
IoS 04/02/2024
14
What is Statutory Interpretation?
Derived from the Latin term ‘interpretari’, which means to explain, expound,
understand, or to translate.
Interpretation is the process of explaining, expounding and translating any text or
anything in written form.
Involves an act of discovering the true meaning of the language which has been used in
the statute.
Various sources used are only limited to explore the written text and clarify what exactly
has been indicated by the words used in the written text or the statutes.
IoS 04/02/2024
15
Interpretation and Construction
IoS 04/02/2024
16
”Interpretation” or “construction”
IoS 04/02/2024
17
”Interpretation” or “construction”
Construction, on the other hand, is the drawing of conclusions, respecting subjects that
lie beyond the direct expressions of the text, from elements known from and given in the
text.
Interpretation only takes place if the text conveys some meaning or other.
Construction is resorted to when, in comparing two different writings of the same
individual, or two different enactments by the same legislative body, there is found
contradiction where there was evidently no intention of such contradiction one of another,
;
" Cooley, Const. Lim. 49-50”
IoS 04/02/2024
18
Role of Legislature- Judiciary- Executive
IoS 04/02/2024
19
What is Statute?
IoS 04/02/2024
20
Classification of Statutes
Classification of Statutes by Duration
Classification of Statutes by Method
Classification of Statues with Reference to Object
Codifying Statute
Consolidating Statute
Declaratory Statute
Remedial Statute
Enabling Statute
Disabling Statute
Penal Statute
Taxing Statute
Explanatory Statute
Amending Statute
Repealing Statute
04/02/2024
Curative or Validating Statute
21
Statutory Enactment - Nature
IoS 04/02/2024
22
Law in 18th Century
IoS 04/02/2024
23
Making Laws & Application of Laws
Lowie, C. J., in Reiser v. The William Tello Saving Fund Association, 39 Pa. St. 146, said :
" We must again insist that the making of laws and the application of them to cases as they arise
are clearly and essentially different functions, and that one of them is allotted by the
constitution to the legislature and the other to the courts.
Chief Justice Gibson expressed his opinion in Greenough v. Greenough, 1 Jones, 494:
'Every tyro or socialist knows that it is the province of the legislature to enact, of the judiciary
to expound, and of the executive to enforce.'
IoS 04/02/2024
24
Statutory Interpretation – Art or Science
IoS 04/02/2024
25
Rules of Interpretation – Why important
(1) They tell interpreters what values and factors to take into account when dealing
with a legislative text.
(2) They supply the vocabulary in which such texts are analyzed and explained.
(3)They shape the arguments used by interpreters in defending their preferred
interpretation and by judges in justifying their decisions.
IoS 04/02/2024
26
Necessity of Statutory Interpretation
Based on Policy
Skeletal Legislation
IoS 04/02/2024
27
“ Constitutional Provisions on
interpretation
IoS 04/02/2024
28
Constitutional Provisions
IoS 04/02/2024
29
Constitutional Provisions
IoS 04/02/2024
31
Constitutional Provisions
367 Interpretation. (1) Unless the context otherwise requires, the General Clauses Act,
1897, shall, subject to any adaptations and modifications that may
be made therein under article 372, apply for the interpretation of
this Constitution as it applies for the interpretation of an Act of the
Legislature of the Dominion of India.
IoS 04/02/2024
32
Judicial Review v Interpretation
IoS 04/02/2024
33
Constitutional Provisions for Statutory
Interpretation
Constitution provides for Judicial Review without specifying how that interpretation
should be conducted;
No provision sets out explicit instructions to judges about the limits interpretation
flexibility;
Constitution provides clue only, that interpretation should be a judicial exercise;
Leaves considerable discretion about the proper nature of judging the application of
statutes in individual cases
There is no accepted general thesis of Constitutionally directed statutory interpretation
Interpretation is the exclusive privileges of the Constitutional courts [State of WB v
Kesoram Industries Ltd (2004)]
IoS 04/02/2024
34
Legislative Instruments
IoS 04/02/2024
35
General Clauses Act, 1897
IoS 04/02/2024
36
Art.13- Laws inconsistent with or in derogation
of the fundamental rights
(1)…
(2)….
IoS 04/02/2024
37
Use of ‘Maxims’
IoS 04/02/2024
Goals of Interpretation
The goal of statutory interpretation should be central to understanding its theory and
practice.
Lack of consensus about the proper goal of this interpretive enterprise, either politically or
legally;
The judicial power, including that of statutory interpretation, derives from the
Constitution.
Judicial Power to Interpret
Constitutional clue- provides only the broad principle that statutory interpretation should
be a “judicial” exercise, which leaves considerable discretion about the proper nature of
judging the application of statutes in individual cases.
Theories of interpretation
IoS 04/02/2024
42
Judge’s view of SOP affects interpretation……
My Court…
My
Interpretation…
IoS 04/02/2024
43
Theories of Interpretation
IoS 04/02/2024
44
IoS 04/02/2024
45
Textualism
Textualism is a theory under which its adherents, textualists, look for the
public meaning of the words used in the statute as of the time the
statute was drafted rather than looking for the legislature’s intent.
Textualists do so in a relatively linear fashion, turning from one source
to the next source until an answer is found.
INTRINSIC
Textualists examine only few sources , focusing primarily on intrinsic
sources, especially the text and related statutes.
IoS 04/02/2024
46
Textualism
Textualists believe that a judge’s role is to be faithful to the Constitution by protecting the
power distribution identified within that document.
“Textualists argue that looking beyond the text raises constitutional concerns. Textualists ‘would
hold Congress to the words it used.… [T]o do otherwise would permit Congress to legislate
without completing the required process for enactment of legislation.’
IoS 04/02/2024
47
Textualism
IoS 04/02/2024
48
Textualism
The plain meaning canon provides that the ordinary meaning of the words of a
statute should control interpretation.
The plain meaning canon matches textualists’ interpretative goal of finding
public meaning;
Problem with the plain meaning canon is that language that seems clear to one
person can be ambiguous or even mean something completely different to another
person.
IoS 04/02/2024
49
Textualism
IoS 04/02/2024
50
Textualism – Key Point
IoS 04/02/2024
51
IoS 04/02/2024
52
Intentionalism
IoS 04/02/2024
53
Intentionalism
Intentionalists, also referred to as originalists, seek out the specific intent of the
legislature that enacted the statute:
What did that legislature have in mind in regard to the specific issue before the court
when the legislature enacted the statute.
intentionalists start with the statutory language. But intentionalists do not stop with the
text, as a textualist would do;
intentionalists move on and examine other sources of meaning.
Unlike a textualist, an intentionalist does not need a reason, such as ambiguity or
absurdity, to consider sources beyond the text.
IoS 04/02/2024
54
Intentionalism – Key Point
IoS 04/02/2024
55
Imaginative Reconstruction: A Version of
Intentionalism
Discerning the specific intent of the enacting legislature is often a difficult, if not
impossible task. Moreover, limiting interpretation to a static point in time creates its own
issues.
Propounded by Dean Roscoe Pound in 1907
Courts to adopt “imaginative reconstructionism” as an approach for discerning the
intent of the enacting legislature.
Using this approach, a judge would try to imagine what the enacting legislature would
have intended had the precise factual problem before the court been raised during the
enactment process.
IoS 04/02/2024
56
IoS 04/02/2024
57
Purposivism
IoS 04/02/2024
58
Purposivism – Key Point
IoS 04/02/2024
59
Dynamic Statutory Interpretation
IoS 04/02/2024
60
Distinction Textualism Intentionalism Purposivism
When used
IoS 04/02/2024
61
Case Study
IoS 04/02/2024
62
Facts
IoS 04/02/2024
63
Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States - 143
U.S. 457, 12 S. Ct. 511 (1892)
IoS 04/02/2024
64
Does Theory Matter?
IoS 04/02/2024
65
Principles- Rules-Canons-Aids
IoS 04/02/2024
66
Principles- Rules-Canons-Aids
IoS 04/02/2024
67
Essentials
IoS 04/02/2024
68
British Jingle
IoS 04/02/2024
69
“
END
IoS 04/02/2024