Dr Sarah Fishwick Overview of the programme: Primary texts: ◦ Nina Bouraoui, Garçon manqué (2000) ◦ Simone de Beauvoir, ‘Monologue’ from La Femme rompue (1968) ◦ Jean Racine, Phèdre (1677) multiple genres diverse historical periods (17th-21st Century) France’s contribution to ideological and creative innovation idea-based rather than fact-based assessment support embedded (e.g. in Week 7) Key dimensions of the course: • How the following might be used to deepen our understanding of texts: ◦ prominent theoretical approaches (e.g. gender theory, reader/audience reception) ◦ literary-critical concepts (e.g. intertextuality, subjectivity, spectatorship) Not forgetting: ◦ how texts produce their effects (e.g. through narrative structure, imagery and vocabulary) Why use ‘theory’?: The genre of ‘theory’ includes works of anthropology, art history, film studies, gender studies, linguistics, philosophy, political theory, psychoanalysis, science studies, social and intellectual history and sociology. The works in question are tied to arguments in these fields, but they become theory because their visions or arguments have been suggestive or productive for people who are not studying those disciplines. Works that become ‘theory’ offer accounts others can use about meaning, nature, and culture, the functioning of the psyche, the relations of public to private experience and of larger historical forces to individual experience. Culler, Jonathan, Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: OUP, 1997), p. 4; my emphasis. Discussion of theoretical perspectives: How appropriate are they to particular texts? What are their limits? How do they interact? How might they be used to expand and refine your personal approaches to texts (i.e. your methodology)? How might they be used to inform and develop your reflections and conclusions? Critical Theory: Uses and Pitfalls: Something to be exploited (e.g. like a new ‘tool kit’!) Do not be put off by the language/jargon View it with suspicion Avoid becoming slavish to it Do not allow it to overshadow the primary text Avoid being a naïve reader: Texts are powerful, but not real. Interpreting is not the same as describing. The text has a life beyond that of its creator (Roland Barthes). No substitute for close reading. Offer your reader a way of making sense of textual patterns and codes. Reflect on the process of reading/spectatorship. Histoire vs récit: ‘Story’ designates the narrated events, abstracted from their disposition in the text and reconstructed in their chronological order, together with the participants in these events. Whereas ‘story’ is a succession of events, ‘text’ is a spoken or written discourse which undertakes their telling. Put more simply, the text is what we read. In it, the events do not necessarily appear in chronological order, the characteristics of the participants are dispersed throughout, and all the items of the narrative content are filtered through some prism or perspective (‘focalizer’). Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith, Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics (London: Routledge, 1983), p.3. The role of the reader: No tale can be told in its entirety. Indeed, it is only through inevitable omissions that a story will gain its dynamism. Thus whenever the flow is interrupted and we are led off in unexpected directions, the opportunity is given to us to bring into play our own faculty for establishing connections – for filling in gaps left by the text itself.
Iser, Wolfgang, ‘The Reading Process: A
Phenomenological Approach’, in The Implied Reader (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1974), 274- 294 (279). Common queries: Q: ‘Do I start reading the theory first or the primary texts?’ Q: ‘Am I to produce my own ideas, or follow the lines suggested by different critics?’ Q: ‘I don’t know how much time I should spend discussing what a feminist perspective is and how much time I should spend analysing the actual text’. Key secondary resources: Lectures! Module Resource List via findit.bham Dictionaries of literary terms/theoretical approaches, e.g.: ◦ Baldick, Chris, The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (Oxford: OUP, 1990) ◦ Buchanan, Ian, The Oxford Dictionary of Critical Theory (Oxford: OUP, 2010)