Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DRSD 23 102
DRSD 23 102
•Institutional Theory:
Organizational Practice by social
pressure than economic pressure
METHODOLOGY DATA ANALYSIS
Qualitative Design •Transcribed recorded data
Case study approach •Coding
Organization registered with fair trade group, Kathmandu •Categorization
Information rich case (Yin, 2014) •Theme
•Credibility
preset thinking and minds were not imposed
Data collection Rigorous interaction were done
five craft business owner(Participant Ram, Participant Shyam, All the available document online and offline were
Participant Gita, Participant Gita, Participant Riya) checked
In-depth interview method (face to face) •Ethical on critical and reflective roles
20-30 minutes •Pseudonym were used
INFLUENCES
•Lack of skilled youth
Participant Riya
There are fewer workers on the job every day………………………………………………Youth migration to other
countries is an issue for our industry.
•Limited Innovation
Participant Ram
I have take over the business of weaning from my parents. I am following same process as my father used to
do in the business. ………………………………………………………………….I even open the vacancy for the
youth with skills to bring the new innovation. However, I received no application for the post.
INFLUENCES
•Dependency on Raw material
Participant Gita
We are a landlocked country that relies on another country for export and transit.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……... We rely on wool from India and the Netherlands because there are no raw materials available or
capable of catering to the industrial level in Nepal.
•Market acceptance
Participant Shyam
It is very hard for us to convince the importance of our product. Our products are handmade.
…………………………It can be identified that some consumers may not be willing to pay the premium prices
that SDEs need in order to be profitable, which can limit the potential market for these enterprises.
INFLUENCES
•Policy Barrier
Participant Gita
A big impediment is the policy barrier. The government has done a lot of lobbying, and we've had several
discussions about it. There are many things that are required of us.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………The government
has various intervention possibilities, yet it is doing nothing.
Participant Ram
As of now, I am running my business as per situation. I have no concrete planning or any long term strategy.
Whatever problems come, I tried to deal accordingly. Sometimes it works and sometime it does not work.
Somehow, I am surviving. However, with growing challenges, I fear I may have to shut down my business.
The only hope is educating and motivating youth to consider craftsmanship and its business as their career.
DISCUSSION
Challenges
•Lack of skilled youth (Khanal & Maharjan, 2010, Ngo et al., 2019)
•Limited innovation (Horbach & Rammer, 2022)
•Dependency on raw material (Bhandari et al., 2022, Mangal, 2022, and
Ngo et al., 2019)
• Market acceptance (Alayon et al., 2022, Mangal, 2022)
• Policy barrier (Kharel & Dahal, 2020, Mangal, 2022, Timsina, 2019)
Resiliency:
As it is (Alternative ways (Hussain, 2021))
Education and awareness as hope (Cagno et al. 2017; Shi et al. 2008)
CONCLUSION IMPLICATIONS
REFERENCES
Bhandari, N., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Rocha-Lona, L., Kumar, A., Naz, F., & Joshi, R. (2022). Barriers to sustainable sourcing in the apparel and fashion
luxury industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 220-235.
Bocken, N. M., &Geradts, T. H. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities.
Long range planning, 53(4), 101950.
Chalise, A. (2021). Sustainable businesses in Nepal: In between sustaining and surviving. The Farsight.
Sustainable businesses in Nepal: In between sustaining and surviving
Costache, C., Dumitrașcu, D. D., &Ionela, M. (2021). Facilitators of and barriers to sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises: A
descriptive exploratory study in Romania.Sustainability, 13, 3212.
Eskildsen, J. K., Edgeman, R., Mønster, D., &Olesen, J. V. (2013). Response based segmentation in satisfaction surveys. In Performance Management
Association Australasia Conference.
Hockerts, K., &Wustenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids—Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in
sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 25(5), 481-492.
Horbach, J., & Rammer, C. (2022). Skills shortage and innovation. Industry and Innovation, 29(6), 734-759.
ILO. (2018). Enabling environment for sustainable enterprises in Nepal. International Labor Organization.Enabling
Environment for Sustainable Enterprises in Nepal
Khanal, N. P., & Maharjan, K. L. (2010). Sustainability of community-based seed production enterprises in Nepal: institutional issues. Nepal Agriculture
Research Journal, 10, 34-41.
Kharel, P., &Dahal, K. (2020). Small and medium-sized enterprises in Nepal: Examining constraints on exporting (No. 1166). ADBI Working Paper
Series.
Mangal, B. (2022). Assessment of Barriers in Sustainable Business Management of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature
Review. Available at SSRN 4294111.
Ngo, T. L., Ngo, Q. D., & Tran, M. D. (2019). Sustainable Development of Enterprises: Barriers and Policy Recommendations. Sustainable
Development, 10(16).
Partidario, M. R., Vicente, G., &Belchior, C. (2010). Can new perspectives on sustainability drive lifestyles?. Sustainability, 2(9), 2849-2872.
Timsina, P. (2019). A study on prospects and problems of Nepalese handicraft export. [Master’s Thesis, Tribhuvan University]
A STUDY ON PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS OF NEPALESE HANDICRAFT EXPORT