OF INTERNAL AUDITORS APPROACHES TO PROJECT MANAGEMENT BY P MLAMBO (PMP) PRESENTER
Project Management Professional (PMP) (USA)
Certified Information Systems Audit (CISA) (USA)
Bsc- Electro mechanical engineering – University of Wuhan
Post Grad- Telecoms
Member of PMI (USA) & PMZ( Zim)
TRAINING OBJECTIVES
After completing this course, participants
will be able: • To identify various available PM approaches • To select & recommend specific PM approaches that suits individual projects for their Organizations • To select & recommend available PM certifications that suits certain approaches Introduction
• The acceptance by organization in
todays competitive world of project management as a profession indicates that the application of knowledge, processes, skills, tools, and techniques can have a significant impact on project success. Project Defined
• Deliver a unique service or product
• Temporary in nature and have definite beginning and ending date • Completed when project goals are met or when it is determined the project is no longer viable • A successful project is one that meets or exceeds the expectations of the client Project Management Definition
• Project management is the discipline of planning, organizing, securing,
managing, leading, and controlling resources to achieve specific goals. A project is a temporary endeavor with a defined beginning and end (usually time-constrained, and often constrained by funding or deliverables), undertaken to meet unique goals and objectives, typically to bring about beneficial change or added value. • The temporary nature of projects stands in contrast with business ‘as usual’ (or operations) which are repetitive, permanent, or semi-permanent functional activities to produce products or services. In practice, the management of these two systems is often quite different, and as such requires the development of distinct technical skills and management strategies. • The primary challenge of project management is to achieve all of the project goals and objectives while honoring the preconceived constraints. The primary constraints are scope, time, quality and budget. • As a discipline, project management developed from several fields of application including civil construction, engineering, and heavy defense activity. Two forefathers of project management are Henry Gantt and Henri Fayol Project Management approaches
• Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) by
Project Management Institute (USA) since 1969 • IPMA - International Project Management Association EU • PRINCE2 –Projects in a Controlled Environment v2 (UK) • PRiSM – Projects Integrating Sustainable Methods • CCPM – Critical Chain Project Management • Agile Project Management – free flow • Lean Project Management • Extreme Project Management Synopsis of Prince 2
• PRINCE2 (“Projects IN Controlled
Environments”) is the de facto standard in the UK. • It was developed for and is used extensively by the UK government, and is widely used in the private sector, in the UK and internationally. • PRINCE2 is in the public domain, offering non- proprietary best-practice guidance on project management. Cont…...
• PRINCE2 is a Process-based, structured
methodology that highlights how eight particular Components, when understood and effectively addressed, can additionally reduce risks in all types of projects. • While PRINCE2 is based in the same ground as the PMBOK, it spotlights a number of areas to concretize PMBOK, and answers the question “how do I apply these concepts in my projects?” PRINCE2 Stages
• To provide the appropriate decision gates at the right
level of the project, PRINCE2 projects are broken down into Stages, much like the Phases of the PMBOK process model. • PRINCE2 calls for decisions about the project as a whole to be made prior to looking at any developmental work. • PRINCE2 differentiates the start up, planning and close for the overall Project (“Starting a Project,” “Initiating a Project” and “Closing a Project”) from the activities to start up and close down each of the Stages (“Managing Stage Boundaries”). Starting Up a Project
• It enables a controlled start to the project.
• It occurs once in the project life cycle, providing the groundwork for project management and oversight, and viability evaluation. • This process creates the Project Board, and ensures that resource requirements are understood and committed to the first Stage, “Initiating a Project”. Directing a Project
• It operates throughout the project, and defines the
responsibilities of the Project Board in its oversight of the project. Like its location in the process model diagram, it sits above and interacts with many of the other processes. • It provides the mechanisms for authorizing the project, approving continuity at the completion of each Stage, and closure of the project (all based on the Business Case). • It is the framework for supplying input to the project manager, receiving requests from the project manager for information and assistance, and making decisions. This is the only process in which the Project Board is active (other than “Starting Up a Project,” when the Board is first formed). All other processes are guided by the Project and Team Managers. Initiating a Project
• Occurs once in the project life cycle.
• It lays out the view of how the overall project is to be managed, and sets it down in a “contract” called the Project Initiation Document (PID). The intention of the PID is to provide a common understanding of the critical elements of the project (similar to the results from PMBOK’s Planning process). “Initiating a Project” also calls for resource commitment by the Project Board to the first developmental Stage of the project. Planning
• It is the common process for several other
processes in PRINCE2. • Plans are produced by identifying the project’s required deliverables, the activities and resources necessary to create them, and the management and quality requirements – all at a level consistent with the control requirements identified in the PID. Use of a common module highlights the concept of a consistent, coherent approach to all planning. Controlling a Stage
• It provides guidance to the Project Manager in
managing the project on a day-to-day basis. It includes: work authorization and receipt of work; issue and change management; status collection, analysis and reporting; viability consideration; corrective action; and escalation of concerns to the Project Board and other resources. “Controlling a Stage” is iterative, and is repeated for each developmental Stage of the project Managing Product Delivery
• is part of PRINCE2’s work authorization
system. It is the mechanism for the performers of technical work (teams, individuals and contractors) to agree on work to be performed, report on progress, complete the work, and return it. • It occurs as frequently as work packages are authorized. Managing Stage Boundaries
• manages the transition from the completion of
one work Stage to the commencement of the next Stage. • It includes assurance that work defined in the Stage has been completed as defined, provides information to the Project Board to assess the ongoing viability of the project (done in “Directing a Project”), develops plans for and obtains authorization for the next Stage of work, and records lessons learned. Closing a Project
• is the mechanism to transition the project back to the
organization. • It closes out the project, whether closure is precipitated by completion of the work, or premature termination. • In either event, “Closing” picks up lessons learned and project experiences for organizational records. For completed work, its goal is to ensure that (a) the work has been completed to the Customer’s and Management’s satisfaction, (b) all expected products have been handed over and accepted by the Customer, and (c) arrangements for the support and operation of project products are in place. PMBOK Approach
• This is a process based standard
developed by PMI (USA). • It is based on process group mapped to 10 knowledge (domains) areas. 10 knowledge areas Initiating the project
Develop Project Charter
Identify Stakeholders Components of project charter Integration
• Think about integration as balancing all
• the processes in the knowledge areas (scope, time, cost, quality, human resource, communication,Risk,Procurement and stakeholder management) • Develop Project management Plan • Directing and managing project works • Monitoring and control project work • Performing integrated change control • Closing the project or any project phase Scope Management
• Scope is defined as the work to be done
to produce the product or deliverable
• Scope management is the process of
defining what work is required and then making sure all of that work-and only that work-is done. Rule of thumb
• Stakeholders should Agree on scope
before any Project work begins----Rule of thumb!!!! Typical WBS Schedule development
• Work with stakeholders' priorities.
• Look for alternative ways to complete the work. • Look for impacts on other projects. • Meet with managers to negotiate for resources. • Apply leads and lags to the schedule. • Compress the schedule by crashing, fast tracking • Give the team a chance to approve the final schedule Time management
• Project time management is often cited as the main
source of conflict on projects, and most projects exceed time estimates. • Main processes include: • Activity definition • Activity sequencing • Activity resource estimating • Activity duration estimating • Schedule development • Schedule control Cost Management
• So what costs should you estimate to include in the budget?
• To put it simply, the costs involved in all the efforts needed to complete the project work. • This could include: • Costs of quality efforts • Costs of risk efforts • Costs of the project manager's time • Costs of project management activities • Costs directly associated with the project, including labor, materials, training for the project, computers, etc. • Expenses for physical office spaces used directly for the project • Profit, when applicable • Overhead costs, such as management salaries and general office expenses Cost baseline template • What would make us fail? Will we deliver this project as required by stakeholders and what would be the consequences if we fail? How can we improve our chances of delivering or reduce the impact of a failure if it occurs? What are our major issues that would cause the project to miss the plan? What should we do about these risks? What are our backup plans if the first plans fail? Plan for human resources
• All projects involve people from different
business disciplines and different business interests Typical project organizational structure Consider human factor
• Masenyama (PMSA representative)
indicated on IPM Day of 2015 that it is the Human factor that can make or break project delivery instead of the esteemed PERT & Gantt chart calculations….. • What's your views Identify and analyze stakeholders THANK YOU!!!!