Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
1. Background to Second Language Acquisition Research and
Language Teaching
1
Introduction
• In a world where more people speak two languages than one, the
acquisition and use of L2s are vital.
2
1.1 The Scope of the Course
3
1.2 Common Assumptions of Language Teaching
Assumption 1 – The basis for teaching is the spoken, not the written language.
Cuba (1999)
•“The principle of the primacy of spoken language” – the emphasis on the spoken language
•Spoken language must be presented from tape before the students saw the written form.
4
1.2 Common Assumptions of Language Teaching
Assumption 2 – Teachers and students should use the L2 rather than the L1 in the classroom.
1.In England, ‘the natural use of the target language for virtually all communication
is a sure sign of a good language course.’
2.In Japan, ‘in principle, English should be selected for foreign language activities.’
3.In almost every teaching manual, ‘the need to have students practicing English,
rather than their L1’, remains paramount.
1.Grammatical rules can be shown through tables or cues, but actual rules should
not be mentioned.
2.Knowing some grammar of language consciously is no guarantee that you can use
it in speech.
3.Speaking by consciously using all the grammatical rules means each sentence may
take several minutes to produce.
6
1.2 Common Assumptions of Language Teaching
Assumption 4 – The aim of language teaching is to make students like native speakers.
1. This assumption has been taken for granted: the native speaker’s competence,
proficiency, vocabulary …
4. This 130-year-old Assumption 4 has come under increasing attack in recent years.
7
1.3 What ‘Is’ Second Language Acquisition Research?
•If L1 lacks ‘th’ or ‘f’, then learners may have problems with English ‘this’ or
‘five’.
Error Analysis (EA): This research method looked at the differences between L2
speech and that of native speakers, to investigate any characteristics.
8
According to various L2 research:
1. School children who are more exposed to English read their L1 better.
2. People who speak an L2 are more creative and flexible at problem-solving than monolinguals.
3. L2 users think differently and perceive the world differently than monolinguals.
4. Children learning L2 English go through stages of (1) only -ing at 5, (2) at 7, regular verb inflections and
then irregular ABC verb inflections, (3) at 9, irregular AAA verb inflections.
6. The knowledge of the L1 is affected in subtle ways by the L2 that you know.
7. L2 users no longer have the same knowledge of their first language as the monolingual native speaker.
8. L2 leaners rapidly learn the appropriate pronunciations ‘going’ and grammar ‘What’s up?’ for their own
gender. This kind of element is important to their identity in the L2.
9
1.4 What a Teacher Can Expect from SLA Research?
1.All successful teaching depends on learning. There is no point in providing any kinds of excellent
language lessons if students do not learn from them.
2.With the exception of young bilingual children, L2 learners have fully formed personalities and
minds (i.e. motivations) when they start learning the L2.
3.The different ways in which students handle learning also affect their success. What is happening
in the class is not equally productive for all the students because their minds work in different ways.
4.However advanced they are, students will find that their memory works less well in the new
language, no matter how and what they try to do.
10
Understanding How Teaching Methods and Techniques Work
2.Communicative teaching methods require the students to talk to each other for the give-and-take of
communication.
3.More information about how learners actually learn helps the teacher to make any method more
effective.
4.The reasons why a teaching technique works or does not work depend on many factors like
‘technique implementation’, ‘student types’, ‘classroom situations’, etc.
11
Understanding the Goals of Language Teaching
1.The reasons the L2 is taught depend on overall educational goals, which greatly vary from
countries to every individual and from one period to another.
3.This information is vital when considering the viability and implementation of goals for a
particular group of students.
4.The choice of what to do in a particular class or lesson depends on the teacher’s assessment of the
factors involved in teaching ‘those’ students in ‘that’ situation.
5.SLA research reveals some of the strengths and weaknesses of a particular teaching method or
technique and it provides information that can influence and guide teaching.
6.Teachers are seldom at liberty to follow their own teaching paths but have to follow those paths
mapped by governments, institutions, books, exam boards, etc.
12
1.5 Some Background Ideas of SLA Research
1.Second language: L2 for immediate use within the country of L2 where L2 is learned with native speakers.
2.Foreign language: L2 for long-term future use and usually within the country of L1, where L2 is learned in a place it
is not used.
3.However, much SLA discussion does not accept the distinction between SL and FL. A lot times, L2 can mean either
of the two.
4.A more idiosyncratic use is the distinction between L2 user and L2 learner.
5.To SLA researchers, grammar mostly means some knowledge in the mind which learners use for constructing
sentences.
6.To teachers, grammar means a set of rules on paper which can be explained to students. Then which grammar is vital
to humans?
13
(2) L2 learning is independent of L1 acquisition.
1.Learning a first language is learning how to mean – discovering that language is used for relating to other people and for
communicating ideas.
2.People learning a second language already know how to mean and know that other people have minds of their own.
3.L2 learning is inevitably different in this respect from L1 learning, except of course for the early simultaneous bilingual.
4.The two forms of learning may well be rather similar, in others quite different – after all the outcome is often very different.
5.L2 learners in fact are different from children learning a first language since there is already one language present in their
minds.
8.One difference is that in L2 acquisition, learners may have to imitate sentences, but ‘imitation’ is almost impossible in L1
acquisition.
14
(3) L2 learning is more than the transfer of the first language.
2.Common linguistic elements in L1 and L2 help L2 learners, and different ones hinder them.
1.L2 learner tries to say “I am not going to school” but “Me go no school”
2.A Korean L2 learner intends to say “We are Koreans” but utter “Us is Korean”.
3.What happened? Has the learner not acquired the grammar or is it L2 transfer?
4.The assumption is that the student’s sentence should be compared to one produced by a native speaker,
because people assume that native-like speech is often a goal for the students.
15
5. But that is what many students want to be, not what they are at the moment. Students are being judged by the
perspectives of native speakers. But they are not native speakers.
6. SLA research insists that learners have to be judged by the proper standards, not by those speech produced by
native speakers.
7. Those erroneous ‘mistakes’ are actually regular patterns in the students’ own knowledge of English. They are only
wrong when measured against native speech.
8. Learner sentences related to their own present language systems when they produce (say or write) the sentence, not
related to the native’s version of English.
9. Learner sentences come from the learners’ own language system. Their L2 speech shows rules and patterns of its
own, and different from native English.
10. L2 can be idiosyncratic and constantly changing, they are in fact systematic. Very systematic!
11. The Independent Language Assumption – Learners are not distorting the native system of a language on purpose,
but they are inventing a language system of their own.
16
17
1. The interlanguage concept had a major impact on teaching techniques in the 1970s.
2. Students’ mistakes were considered to be serious under the teaching methods that used drills and grammatical
explanations. Mistakes due to not properly learning the ‘habit’ of speaking; not understanding the grammatical
rules.
3. In communicative language teaching methods of the 1970s and 1980s and the task-based learning of the 1990s …
learner sentences reflect the temporary language systems, not some kind of imperfect or defective production of
the native language.
4. If a student makes a ‘mistake’, it is not the fault of the teacher or the student, but an inevitable and natural part of
the learning process.
5. Students’ mistakes are in fact only minor irritants rather than major hazards.
6. Not fully adopted in SLA research, but we have the knowledge of our first language and also the knowledge of
interlanguage. These two languages coexist in the same mind.
18
19
[Questions]
1. What teaching methods do you believe in? What evidence do you have for the success?
2. If the native speaker is not the model, what should an L2 learner aim at?
3. What would you do to a student in the class who is not motivated to learn an L2?
20
The End of Ch.1
21