Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fractureshaftoffemurfinal 180203132536
Fractureshaftoffemurfinal 180203132536
Presented by
Prakat c. Aryal
Intern Orthopedics
Group N
spiral fracture is usually caused by a fall in which the foot is anchored while a
twisting force is transmitted to the femur.
Transverse /obligue: angulation or direct violence.
communited/ segmental: very high energy trauma
05/13/2024 P.C.Aryal Intern Group N 8
05/13/2024 P.C.Aryal Intern Group N 9
05/13/2024 P.C.Aryal Intern Group N 10
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
• Symptoms
• pain in thigh
• History of trauma, RTAs, explosives, gunshots, sports related
injury(skiing, climbing)(high velocity trauma)
• Attitude
• In proximal shaft fractures the proximal fragment is flexed, abducted and
externally rotated because of gluteus medius and iliopsoas pull; the distal
fragment is frequently adducted.
• In lower third fractures the proximal fragment is adducted and the distal
fragment is tilted by gastrocnemius pull.
• Recommended views
• AP and lateral views of entire femur
• AP and lateral views of ipsilateral hip
• AP and lateral views of ipsilateral knee
• R – Resuscitation
done at the site of trauma/ER, comprises the addressing of
acute life threatening condition related to fracture/ trauma
• R-Reduction
Definitive management of fracture done internally/externally
• R-Retention
Stabilization of fracture segment throughout the healing process
• R-Rehabilitation
Focusing on getting the patient back to his ADL as soon as
possible
• Indications
• Medically unfit for surgery
• Polytrauma, in extremis
• Advantage
• Stabilization when immediate surgery is not possible or
practical
• Disadvantages
• Overlap of the fracture can occur despite traction
• Continuing motion at the fracture site
• Continuing soft-tissue compromise and bleeding
• Indications
• All patients with femoral shaft fractures except those not fit
for definitive surgery
• Isolated fractures
• Closed fractures
• Gustilo types I & II open fractures
• Polytrauma patients in stable condition
• Contraindications
• Polytrauma patients in unstable condition
• Not medically fit for surgery(avoid the second hit)
• Image intensifier unavailable
• Associated vascular injury requiring open repair
• Periprosthetic fractures
• Continuing infection
• Occluded intramedullary canal
• Gustilo type III C open fractures
• Advantages
• Less invasive procedure / indirect reduction
• Minimizes soft-tissue damage
• Fracture can be reduced (length, angular and rotational control
are obtained)
• Better biomechanical properties
• Definitive procedure
• Rapid mobilization of patients postoperatively
• Minimal blood loss
• Good cosmetic results
• Disadvantages
• Risk of iatrogenic femoral neck fracture
• Risk of fat embolization
• Closed reduction may be more challenging than open
reduction
• Frequent use of image intensifier – risk of increased radiation
exposure
Indications
• All patients with femoral shaft fractures where intramedullary
nailing is contraindicated, but the patient is fit for surgery
• Indirect reduction impossible
• No image intensifier available
• Early pregnancy (up to 12 weeks gestation) due to the risks from
radiation exposure
05/13/2024 P.C.Aryal Intern Group N 29
ORIF WITH PLATE
Contraindications
• Patient not medically fit for surgery
• Osteomyelitis
• Compromised local soft tissues
• Advantages
• Less demanding procedure
• Less exposure to ionizing radiation
• Direct reduction
• Fracture can be reduced (length, angular and rotational control
are obtained)
• Fracture stabilization with a plate reduces the incidence of fat
embolization compared to IM nailing
• Fracture stabilization allows for early patient mobilization
• Disadvantages
• Greater blood loss
• Exposure of fracture zone / risk of interference with healing
process
• Larger operative soft-tissue trauma
• Less appealing cosmetic result
• There is a risk of screws pulling out in osteoporotic bone. This
risk is reduced with locking screws.
• Contraindication
• Osteoporosis (relative contraindication)
• Advantage
• Rapidly applied provisional treatment, early mobilization
• Disadvantages
• Possible loss of fixation
• Pin-track infection
• Cumbersome fixation interferes with lower limb function
• May interfere with procedures for soft-tissue reconstruction
• High risk of nonunion/malunion when used for definitive
treatment
05/13/2024 P.C.Aryal Intern Group N 36
05/13/2024 P.C.Aryal Intern Group N 37
05/13/2024 P.C.Aryal Intern Group N 38
• Conversion of temporary external fixation to an
intramedullary nail within the first 2 weeks after a femoral
shaft fracture is standard practice.
• However, due to financial constraints, in large parts of the
world external fixation of femoral shaft fractures is often the
definitive treatment.
References
• Apley's System of Orthopaedics and Fractures 9th ed.
• Essential ortho paedics 5th edition
• Clinically oriented antomy 6th edition
• www.aofoundation.org
• www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2267585