Professional Documents
Culture Documents
October 2011
Contents
1.
2.
Introduction
Characterizing the nature of tourist-local encounters and relationships Empirical studies and dynamic views of relationships
3.
4.
Conclusion
1.Introduction
Encounters and relationships between hosts and guests / tourists and locals. A key component of tourism A key subject of investigation: The view from Anthropology
Smith, V. L. ed. (1978) Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Smith, V. L. ed. (1989) Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism Second Edition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
1.Introduction
More than three decades of research: Has everything been said?
Nuez, T. (1978) Touristic Studies in Anthropological Perspective. In: Smith, V. L. ed. Hosts and Guests: the Anthropology of Tourism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp.207-216. What is the nature of the interaction between hosts and tourists? (Nuez, 1978, p.212) Urges anthropologists to study the indigenous population and the tourist population in interaction, by engaging with both sides of the divide (1978, p.212).
1.Introduction
More than three decades of research: Has everything been said?
Stronza, A. (2001) Anthropology of Tourism: Forging New Ground for Ecotourism and Other Alternatives. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, pp.261-283. the current literature on tourism may be divided conceptually into two halves, one that focuses on understanding the origins of tourism and one that aims to analyze the impacts of tourism (2001, p.262). missing from many current analyses is an attempt to learn more about the dynamics of host-guest interactions by observing and talking with people on both sides of the encounter (2001, p.272).
1.Introduction
More than three decades of research: Has everything been said?
While the importance of the issue has been repeatedly highlighted, few authors have actually put touristic encounters and relationships at the centre of their investigations. When it has been addressed this issue has often been summarily resolved, leading to evaluative judgments and generalizations.
1.Introduction
Contrasting and opposed generalizations
Touristic encounters and relationships constitute a realm of mere illusion and make believe association, a parody of human relationships (Krippendorf 1999 [1984], p.58; van den Berghe 1980, p.378) where deception and exploitation prevail. VS Portrayed as the building block for global peace and cultural understanding bringing ordinary men and women from around the world into contact with one another, and thus helping dispel the myths, stereotypes and caricatures that often hold sway from a distance. (KiMoon 2007).
1.Introduction
Negative assessments prevail in academic generalizations
Answering his own question on the nature of relationships between hosts and tourists, Nuez maintained that such relationship: is almost always an instrumental one, rarely coloured by affective ties, and almost always marked by degrees of social distance and stereotyping that would not exist amongst neighbours, peers, or fellow countrymen (1978, p.212). Instrumentality, social distance, stereotyping: repeatedly highlighted in the anthropological literature (van den Berghe 1980; 1994), Nash (1978; 1981; 1996), Cohen (1984) and Crick (1989).
1.Introduction
Negative assessments prevail in academic generalizations Early reviews and assessments:
Merit: Try to highlight and characterize some specific features of touristic encounters and relationships. Risk: Ambition to generalize and be conclusive on the matter, leads to close too early a field of research that has more to offer for the understanding of tourism and human relations.
1.Introduction
Empirically grounded research Reassess touristic encounters and relationships and their potential:
Question the view of ineluctably transient, impersonal, and commoditized relationships. Show the potential of touristic encounters to recreate social relationships, and eventually generate long-term, personalized, and reciprocal ties. Cohen (1971), Adams (1992), Tucker (1997; 2001; 2003), and Cabezas (2006).
van den Berghe, P. (1980) Tourism as Ethnic Relations: A Case Study form Cuzco, Peru. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 3 (4), pp.376-392. Researches on interactions between foreign tourists and members of the visited population in Cuzco (Peru) (1980).
Stereotypical perceptions
Impersonal, de-humanized nature of relationships
Native hospitality Anomic stage, predatory orientation Commoditized service relationships, staged as personnalized
Cohen, E. (1971) Arab Boys and Tourist Girls in a Mixed Jewish-Arab Community. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, XII, pp.217-233. Shows the surprising significance relations with foreign tourist girls (1971, p.1) could acquire for the Arab youth amongst which the author carried out his ethnographic fieldwork
-Act as a window to the wide world and allows them to learn foreign
languages - Hold the (false?) promise of getting away from their problems by moving abroad
4. Conclusion
The nature of touristic encounters and relationships A longstanding subject of investigation and the prevalence of evaluative generalizations:
In spite of early interest (Smith ed. 1978), few authors have actually focused their researches on touristic encounters and relationships.
Evaluative generalizations predominate:
Mutual understanding, intercultural communications, peace, establishment of positive connections between people from across the globe. VS Striking inequalities, deception, misunderstanding and reciprocal exploitation.
4. Conclusion
The nature of touristic encounters and relationships A longstanding subject of investigation and the prevalence of evaluative generalizations:
It the academia, nature of relationships between tourists and locals characterized as: - Transient, manipulative and exploitative (van den Berghe 1980). - Mercenary and sterile (Krippendorf 1999 [1984]) - Impersonal (Pi-Sunyer 1978; Nash 1978; 1981) - De-humanized (Crick 1989) - Staged as personalized following a linear evolution towards the commoditization of hospitality (Cohen 1984).
4. Conclusion
Risks and problems
These perspectives run the risk of reiterating taken for granted: - idealizations - when a navely positive stance predominates - critiques - once cynically negative assessments prevails. Generalizations too often rely on deductive assumptions and clear-cut judgments. They do not pay enough attention to the understandings of research participants.
4. Conclusion
Risks and Problems
Generalizing perspectives do not enhance our understanding of how touristic encounters and relationships emerge and develop in situ.
They neglect the transformations of tourists and locals understandings as a result of their encounters and relationships.
4. Conclusion
Risks and Problems
Tourists and members of the visited population may themselves preconceive touristic encounters and relationships to be manipulative, impersonal, or staged. However, their reciprocal interactions have the potential to open up other possibilities and scenarios. Their consequences cannot be predicted in advance. Only by paying close attention to these moments of interaction we can gain a clear picture of their generative possibilities.
4. Conclusion
Empirical studies and dynamic views of relationships
Show how notions of - friendship (Cohen 1971) - reciprocity and hospitality (Adams 1992; Tucker 2003) - commoditized service (Cabezas 2006) - love and partnership (Brennan 2004; Kummels 2005) - market and commerce (Forshee 1999) are reconstructed and renegotiated from within touristic encounters.
4. Conclusion
Empirical studies and dynamic views of relationships
Thesis on touristic encounters in Cuba (Simoni 2009) integrates and builds on these approaches Advocates the need for more empirically informed studies Recognizes and illuminates the complexities, ambiguities, and generative potential of touristic encounters and relationships. Leads to reassess notions of tourism harassment, economic transaction, friendship, festive, and sexual relationships in the field of tourism.
4. Conclusion
Empirical studies and dynamic views of relationships
Potential of touristic encounters to regenerate, from within, the meanings and expressions of various types of engagements and relationships. Profound implications for the ways we imagine and apprehend the encounters and relationships that develop through tourism. Building on these insights, further research can enhance our understanding of how people relate across differences and inequalities in the contemporary world. Ultimately shed light on tourism promises and challenges to build a common humanity.
5. References
Adams, V. (1992) Tourism and Sherpas, Nepal: Reconstruction of Reciprocity. Annals of Tourism Research, 19, pp.534-554. Brennan, Denise (2004) Whats Love Got to Do with It? Transnational Desires and Sex Tourism in the Dominican Republic. Durham: Duke University Press Cabezas, A. L. (2006) The Eroticization of Labor in Cubas All-Inclusive Resorts: Performing Race, Class, and Gender in the New Tourist Economy. Social Identities, 12 (5), pp.507-521. Cohen, E. (1971) Arab Boys and Tourist Girls in a Mixed Jewish-Arab Community. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, XII, pp.217-233. Cohen, E. (1984) The Sociology of Tourism: Approaches, Issues, and Findings. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, pp.373-392. Crick, M. (1989) Representations of Tourism in the Social Sciences: Sun, Sex, Sights, Savings, and Servility. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 307-344. Forshee, J. (1999) Domains of Pedaling: Souvenirs, Becak Drivers, and Tourism in Yogyakarta, Java. In: Forshee, J., Fink, C. & Cate, S. eds. Converging Interests: Traders, Travelers, and Tourists in Southeast Asia. Berkeley: University of
California, pp.293-317.
5. References
Ki-Moon, B. (2007) Remarks to the World Tourism Organization in Madrid, 5 June 2007. [Internet]. Available from: <http://www.un.org>. [Accessed 3 July 2008]. Krippendorf, J. (1999) [1984] The Holiday Makers: Understanding the Impact of Leisure and Travel. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Kummels, I. (2005) Love in the Time of Diaspora. Global Markets and Local Meaning in Prostitution, Marriage and Womanhood in Cuba. Iberoamericana, 5 (20), pp.7-26. Nash, D. (1978) Tourism as a Form of Imperialism. In: Smith, V. L. ed. Hosts and Guests: the Anthropology of Tourism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 33-47. Nash, D. (1981) Tourism as an Anthropological Subject. Current Anthropology, 22 (5), pp.461-481. Nuez, T. (1978) Touristic Studies in Anthropological Perspective. In: Smith, V. L. ed. Hosts and Guests: the Anthropology of Tourism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp.207-216. Pi-Sunyer, O. (1978) Through Native Eyes: Tourists and Tourism in a Catalan Maritime Community. In: Smith, V. L. (ed.) Hosts and Guests: the Anthropology of Tourism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp.149-155.
5. References
Simoni, V. (2009) Touristic Encounters in Cuba: Informality, Ambiguity, and Emerging Relationships. PhD Thesis. Leeds Metropolitan University. Smith, V. L. ed. (1978) Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Smith, V. L. ed. (1989) Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism Second Edition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Stronza, A. (2001) Anthropology of Tourism: Forging New Ground for Ecotourism and Other Alternatives. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, pp.261283. Tucker, H. (1997) The Ideal Village: Interactions through Tourism in Central Anatolia. In: Abram, S., Waldren, J. & Macleod, D. V. L. eds., Tourists and Tourism. Identifying with People and Places. Oxford: Berg. pp. 107-128. Tucker, H. (2001) Tourists and Troglodytes: Negotiating for Sustainability. Annals of Tourism Research, 28 (4), pp.868-891. Tucker, H. (2003) Living with Tourism: Negotiating Identities in a Turkish Village. London & New York: Routledge. van den Berghe, P. (1980) Tourism as Ethnic Relations: A Case Study form Cuzco, Peru. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 3 (4), pp.376-392.