Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stuart C. Ord
Consequences
YES !
How to predict it and prevent it damaging pipelines and equipment
What is it?
Shock
A
Any length Any diameter Any fluid contents Any pipe material
Where is it a problem?
Where flowrate changes rapidly Obvious causes e.g. valves, pumps Less obvious causes e.g. cavitation, ROs Where Where
Pipe support
Liquid stationary
Liquid stationary
Joukowski equation:
Limiting
closure time:
dP = v * c * r
t=2*L c
L = length of pipe, m t = pipeline period, s
c = speed of the sound wave in the pipe, known as the wave celeric, m/s V = initial flow velocity of the liquid, m/s r = fluid density
F = A * dP
A = pipe cross-sectional area F = force, N dP = Joukowski pressure rise
Flexible structures
Dynamic load factor Force reduced to zero for flexible structures Force doubled for rigid structures
F = A * dP * DLF
Wave celeric
C0 C Kd 1 Ee
Downstream of valves
Liquid is slowed by pressure falling Limited scope before cavitation occurs Often the fluid can return to collapse the cavity If so, severe water hammer can be expected
High pressure Low pressure Liquid flowing steadily
High points
More
Cavities can form without the help of water hammer Decelerating fluid makes them more likely
Barometric leg
Vapour cavity
Pump tripped
Venting gases
Unstable
flow as gas is flushed out Unusual case of restrictor orifice A) Just before the strike
Air
E-39
Restrictor - orifice
Non-return valves
Uncontrolled,
E-48
Valve characteristics
Valves
Some
Exact
Valve characteristics
Danger signs
Long Long
Large
Low
Pump
inertia - flywheels
devices
Surge tanks / accumulators Correctly designed non-return valves Pressure relief valves
Stronger
pipes
Surge tank
Complex spring loaded ones give the most reliable closure at minimum flow whilst giving reasonable forward flow resistance
Non-return valves
Flywheels
Flywheels can be highly reliable Weak link between flywheel and motor Less expensive than large accumulator Especially if expensive material of construction
Flywheels
Flywheels
situations
situations
(Istec Ingenieria, Uruguay)
Hytrans Hytran
Spreadsheet
(www.CEDCS.com)
Flowmaster - setup
Flowmaster - results
Hytrans - setup
Hytrans results
Spreadsheet
Results
Flowmaster
Excellent graphics of max / min values Hytrans Graphs of values vs time, mix & match Simpler graphics of max / min values Cavity formation (requires care) Graphs of pressure & flow vs time, animated
Warns of cavities
Spreadsheet
Indicative only
Interpretation of results
Pressure limits Examination of max / min values
Processing by spreadsheet
COMAH
Criterion 5.2.1.6 The safety report should show that all foreseeable direct causes of major accidents have been taken into account in the design of the installation Vibration Vibration generated .... may be caused by changes in phase, water hammer, high pressure drop or cavitation....., poor piping design, etc.. .... may induce fatigue failure of the containment. The safety report should show how vibration has been assessed, and any potential problems addressed.
COMAH
Update the safety report every five years or after significant changes or new knowledge about safety matters The safety report needs to be kept up to date. If there are any modifications to the plant or the way it is operated or if new facts or information become available, the safety report must be reviewed and, if necessary, revised at the time. It must be reviewed after five years even if there have not been any changes.
Conclusions
It
is necessary to know enough to spot the danger signs Solutions to problems can be simple Ignoring the problem can lead to disaster Analysing for potential problems and correct solutions can be legally mandatory Complex high risk situations need expert modelling and design solutions
Data requirements
YES !
know what causes it We can predict it We can prevent it damaging pipelines and equipment
Stuart Ord www.CEDCS.com
Demonstration links
Link to force analysis demo data Link to force analysis real data
Demo model
20m level