LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

LEARNING TEAM_____B____ ASSIGNMENT _______CHAPTER 4____________________ WEEK____4_____

USING THE SCALE BELOW, INDIVIDUALLY RATE EACH MEMBER OF YOUR LEARNING TEAM, INCLUDING YOURSELF (PLEASE USE THE COLLABORATION GUIDE ON THE
NEXT PAGE FOR A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EACH CATEGORY).
4 = Excellent 3 = Good 2 = Fair 1 = Poor 0 = None

Learning Team Team Time Establishing Professional Team Collaboration

Involvement Management and Following Communication Contributions Comments
Evaluation Guidelines
Form (Active and (Supported team (Helped to define (Communicated (What did each team member (Please include any comments
substantively timeline) and adhere to the clearly and contribute to the assignment? What describing why each person
involved in the goals, roles, and professionally) value did that contribution add to received the collaboration score
team discussion) responsibilities of the completed assignment? ) that you gave them.)
the team)

score score score score comments comments

Bree Bentley First slide and posted
4 4 4 4 Just getting it done
work
Crystal Brooks Time management
4 2 4 4 One slide
issue
Sherrie Clark
4 4 4 4 One slide On time
Ken Clark I had to cut down
some sentences he
4 4 2 4 One slide
had on the slide to
short phrases

Team Contributions
Please consider the following when providing individual and team feedback on contributions made to the assignment.
1) Based on the contributions and collaboration for this assignment, should all team members get the same grade? If not, who
should get a different grade (higher or lower) and why?
2) What value you did you add to the completed product? How does that compare to your teammates?
3) What can you, personally, do to improve future team collaborations?
*Please review the Learning Team Collaboration Guide on the next page for a description of the expectations for each category.

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams. February 2011
 LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

Learning Team Collaboration Guide

Team Time Establishing and Following Professional
Involvement Management Guidelines Communication
Interacted with other members
of the team with a respectful and
Active and substantive Supported team timeline and Took the lead on establishing
professional tone.
Excellent (4) involvement in team met the assignment due date. and following the goals, roles,
Communication was clear with
discussions. and responsibilities of the team.
no typographical or grammatical
errors.

Interacted with other members

Supported a majority of the of the team with a respectful and
Good overall substantive Helped to establish and follow
team timeline and met the professional tone.
Good (3) involvement in team the goals, roles, and
assignment due date. Communication was clear with
discussion. responsibilities of the team.
minor typographical or
grammatical errors.

Interacted with other members

of the team with an informal
Moderate substantive Supported some of the team
Followed the goals, roles, and tone. Communication was
Fair (2) involvement in team timeline and met the
responsibilities of the team. effective with minor
discussion. assignment due date.
typographical or grammatical
errors.

Interactions with other members

of the team were disrespectful
Minimal substantive Did not support the team Did not always follow the goals,
Poor (1) and inappropriate at times.
involvement in team timeline but still met the roles, and responsibilities of the
Communication was poor with
discussion. assignment due date. team.
numerous typographical or
grammatical errors.

No substantive involvement in Did not support the team Did not follow team goals, roles, No communication.
None (0)
team discussion. timeline . or responsibilities.

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams. February 2011