STATEMENT to the ACTUAL STATUS of ILLEGALITY of MGMThe practice of MGM violates numerous law and international treaties, including theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the UNConvention against Torture and in this also the US- Constitution and Federal-Law.Such mutilation infringes upon the guarantees of rights secured by Federal and State law, bothstatutory and constitutional!EVIDENCE of the ILLEGALITY of the above as OUTLAWED stated ACT of MGM:
CONCLUSION: MGM is already outlawed by the existing laws the same as is FGM.The creation of a law to outlaw MGM is NOT requiredCHALLENGE: Anyone who is able to produce intelligible incontestable evidence incontradiction to the above Statement is challenged to come forward with suchevidence!Since this act of child mutilation is in fact outlawed and no person is able to contest this factof law, the above challenge is hypothetical and only posed for educational reason, so all thosewho still act as if MGM were legal, to be able to come to their senses.The following questionary serves the purpose of self-reflection.Q: What stops people, what stops also the Intactivist-Movement; what stops “legal-experts”;what stops the police; states-attorneys, lawyers and the government to understand thatwhat is done to the child
IS ALREADY OUTLAWED
by the existing Law?A: IGNORANCE. Hearsay, Myth. Fallacy and because 99% of the Adult-Population is beingSET UP BLINDED to act as if this most obvious ILLEGALLITY were legal.Q: Which indication exists in sight of this act, that evidently suggests that this obvious >wilfulinfliction of preventable injury to the child< is secured by the existing law?A: NO! Because the above provided evidence of MGM excludes any sign of legality!Q: Are you able to produce a State guaranteed right for any person to inflict this injury to thechild?A: NO! Because the State guaranteed right of the Child includes the child’s right forprotection from any Child Abuse, including the above shown Child Abuse of MGM!Q: Are you able to produce a Constitutional- and/or a Federal-Law-Text which states a rightfor the discrimination of the male-child-population from its constitutional right for equallaw-protection?A: NO! Because the Constitutional-Right for Equal-Protection is undividable!