Master Plan Study Update OKI Regional Planning Forum February 24, 2012

1
Get here. Get there. Get home.

Agenda
Master Plan Process Forecast Review Terminal Area Alternatives Discussion Next Steps

DRAFT for Discussion

Get here. Get there. Get home.

Forecast Discussion
Baseline Forecast used for financial planning while Multi-Carrier Forecast used for facility planning Planning Activity Levels (PALS) will be defined as triggers for growth
Actual activity levels can be easily monitored and compared to PALs to project when facilities may be needed Activity levels are reached at different years in the various forecasts Use of PALs allows flexibility to act as demand materializes
DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

Enplanements Forecast
CVG Enplanements - Historical and Forecast 1991 - 2035 (thousands)
14,000

2007 MPU Forecast

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

Market stimulation increases O&D traffic in near term

4,000

2,000

1991

1998

2005

2012

2019

2026

2033

Historical Originating Dominant Carrier + LCC Enplanements Historical Trend Enplanements 2007 MPU DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

Historical Connecting Multi-Carrier Enplanements Enplanements - Baseline Derivation 2011 TAF

Passenger Aircraft Departures

CVG Passenger Aircraft Departures - Historical and Forecast 1991 - 2035 (thousands)
250,000

2007 MPU Forecast

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035

International Passenger Departures Multi-Carrier Departures

2007 MPU Get here. Get there. Get home.

Domestic Passenger Departures Baseline Departures

2011 TAF

Dominant + LCC Departures

Departures - Regression Derivation

DRAFT for Discussion -

Key Attributes of CVG in 2035

Cost-sensitive development which allows for expansion of air service
Timely rehab/replacement of assets/facilities Re-use of facility if functional & meets customer service goals

High Customer Service

Close-in gates Adequately sized facilities Walk-able parking and rental car facility

Emphasis and focus on local passengers Terminal area development preserves maximum flexibility and opportunity for west commercial area
DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

Summary of Requirements
Airside
Gate count meets future demand, but facility condition and cost of operation may drive replacement/rehab Terminal 3 passenger processing space adequate to meet passenger demand - functionality/customer service also considered

Landside
Parking demand exceeds future capacity / Close-in rental car facility incorporated Some improvements required for roadway access/curb front changes

Other
Land use and west commercial development area will be evaluated in next steps

DRAFT for Discussion

Get here. Get there. Get home.

Alternative A1 Features
Airside
Reconstructs Concourse A Renovates Terminal 3 and Concourse B Removes portion of Conc. B but requires continued use of tunnel for passengers and bags

Landside
Renovates T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages with new public parking, consolidated rental car facility (CONRAC) and quick turn around area (QTA) Retains main terminal roads, but provides new rental car/commercial vehicle access

Balances capital with O&M costs

DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

Alternative A1: 2035

DRAFT for Discussion

Get here. Get there. Get home.

Alternative A2 Features
Airside
Eliminates Conc. B with new & expanded Conc. A in new location Passengers use above-grade connection (optional), but have increased walking distance to end of Concourse Good aircraft movement

Landside
Renovates & expands T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages with new public parking, CONRAC and QTA Reconfigures main terminal roads and up-ramp to provide access to terminal and rental car facility

Higher capital costs, but reduces O&M

DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

10

Alternative A2: 2035

2700 long concourse

DRAFT for Discussion

Get here. Get there. Get home.

11

Alternative E Features
Airside
Retains and renovates Conc. A & B, with portion of Conc. A being demolished

Landside
Renovates T3 Garage, replaces T1 and T2 Garages with new public parking, CONRAC and QTA Retains main terminal roads, but provides new rental car/commercial vehicle access

Minimizes capital costs, but significant O&M and renovation costs for older facilities
DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

12

Alternative E: 2035

DRAFT For Discussion

Get here. Get there. Get home.

13

New V Alternative Features

Sketched in workshops layout to be refined Airside
Shorter passenger walking distances Good aircraft circulation and access Allows customs to be relocated closer to terminal

Landside
Can pair with best landside alternative

Higher capital, but reduces O&M

DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

14

V Alternative
Pair with best landside alternative

Two concourses allow incremental expansion to meet demand

DRAFT for Discussion

Get here. Get there. Get home.

15

Next Steps
Define the V Alternative in terms of layout, costs, phasing, and landside Address plan for short term: now through 2015 Refine other terminal area alternatives based on feedback from workshop
Cost both capital cost and O&M Phasing to minimize disruption, coordinate with near-term facility demo, and reduce temporary construction Evaluate in terms of goals and objectives
DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

16

Next Steps Continued

Develop coordinated CIP Plan remaining MPU elements
Airfield requirements Land development/land use West service area uses

Schedule next set of workshops to:

Review and evaluate terminal alternatives to select preferred concept Review work on remaining MPU elements

Complete financial plan, e-ALP, implementation plan Public Meetings

DRAFT for Discussion
Get here. Get there. Get home.

17